Posted on 06/24/2011 3:17:52 AM PDT by don-o
I'm not pro-abortion. I'm pro-choice. For those who think ending a pregnancy is a crime, I hope life treats them well enough that it never becomes an issue. Any woman who'd never make that choice under any circumstance has my total support and respect. But it is not the government's right to assume control of any woman's reproduction rights. That is a private matter between her, her conscience, her own core beliefs and the people she wants to confide in.
Here's what I wish most of all: I wish there was as much passionate concern, the same raging commitment for unwanted children already here as there seems to be for the ones who might be.
(Excerpt) Read more at knoxnews.com ...
Then, there's the tired, old and made up declaration of "reproduction rights." Never forget that that was made up from whole cloth by Roe v Wade. There is no such thing.
ping
That's par for the course when attempting to defend permissive abortion policy without suffering severe qualms.
Go ahead, kill your unborn baby, or if you prefer “terminate your pregnancy”.......just don’t make me pay for it.
God created “Reproductive Rights” and it is these low-life rationalists that are taking it away.
Those who do it are suffereing in their own little hells but are usually too damned afraid to admit it. McCorvey is the peerfect example in that it finally got to her and now she is doing everything she can to undo it.
Amen Brother.
What a bunch of tripe. First of all, the unborn children are here just as much as the born one (otherwise, there could be no abortion).
Second, people desperately want children; wouldn't it be great if those children were available for adoption instead of being dismembered and thrown in a trash can? (And, on the flip side, if the children were available, would so many couples spend thousands on fertility treatments--possibly guaranteeing that whatever medical conditions prevented them from being able to conceive naturally are passed on to their children?)
Third, it is the pinnacle of selfishness for the mother to rationalize looking out for her convenience by claiming that the kid will have a rotten life if she doesn't kill it. The time to think about whether a kid is convenient or not is before getting pregnant, not after. But I guess avoiding pregnancy is just too inconvenient, as well.
I guess this woman does not realize that the religious and the conservative are the most generous contributors to private charity and the group as a whole dedicated to adopting children.
I think she means “any women's” choice to kill another human being that resides in her womb...As far as I know there are not any current laws telling an adult, sane, woman how many children she can have, who she can have intercourse with, or how many times....assuming she keeps the action within the human species.
To the stupid author who thinks that those of us who don’t have abortions are “being treated well by life,” she can just stuff it. Life hasn’t always been kind to me but I had - at the very least - the strength to avoid having an abortion. And I think of Sarah Palin - knowingly carrying a Down Syndrome baby for 9 months - and refusing to abort him. Has life always treated her so kindly?
My conclusion is the Leftwingtards hate babies.
“But it is not the government’s right to assume control of any woman’s reproduction rights.”
Why, you goofy sack of rat crap. Nobody has a right to kill an innocent human being.
Ina, guess what...you’re a baby-killer. Nice try
“unwanted children”
Wait until you’re an unwanted old person.
I would remind the writer that no one has ever sought to assume control of any woman's reproductive right. When a woman has an abortion it doesn't prevent her from becoming pregnant in the future. In fact, many women have multiple abortions.
The opposition to abortion is to prevent the death of an innocent human being. It could be easily proven that a preborn in the womb is indeed a unique and separate individual human being by doing a DNA test between mother and the preborn. But you'll never find a liberal with the guts to do the test.
Baby-grinder. Just say it, there's not enough words to hide the fact...
It is why the leftists admire state communism and islam ,because they all secretly wish for dozens of slaves forced to bow to them and fulfill their base wants.They care not a whit for the wants or needs of those they would enslave.
They also lack the mathematical reasoning skills to figure the odds of their being a slave rather than a ruler, in any such system. 100 losers to 1 winner? 10,000 to 1? It depends on the size of original population, I suppose.
Typical liberal. Do what you want with no consequences, and if conservatives demand that there be consequences they should have to foot the bill. Why should I have to pay you for your child because you wouldn’t keep your legs together?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.