Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: manc; 668 - Neighbor of the Beast; conservativebuckeye
not all teachers are liberals. I know many many teachers who are conservative and teach as they should plus many do not agree with tenure nor are they in a union.
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

The following is a **GENERAL** statement that applies to the entire institution of **all** government schools. It is NOT directed to any individual ( or relative of) any poster here on Free Republic!

**ALL** government schools in this nation are socialist-funded, collectivist and voter mob managed ( school boards), and are godless in their worldview! **ALL** of them! It does not matter where in the country they are located.

Therefore:

**Children who attend these socialist, collectivist managed and godless government institutions become comfortable with taking money from a neighbor for a service their parents want for tuition-free. In fact, their teachers teach them that they are entitled to this money taken from other by way of police threat. These children also learn to be comfortable with the collectivist voting mob controlling their lives.

Also...Children **MUST** learn to think and reason godlessly if they attend they schools. They must simply to cooperate with the classroom instruction and do assignments.

Personally, I don't know how any teacher of good conscience could cooperate with the establishment and functioning of such a spiritually and educationally corrupting institution. To use an extreme example, should guards in Nazi concentration camps actually have **volunteered** and have applied for jobs a concentration camp because they might have been able to sneak in a few crumbs of bread to the prisoners? Well?...Should God-fearing conservatives **willingly** apply for jobs at government schools so they can sneak in a few crumbs of God-centered belief or conservatism into a system that is godless and socialist to the core?

Yes, yes,...I hear that some conservatives and Christians try to sneak in some Christianity and conservatism into their classes. Yes, indeed, they are teaching a perverse lesson!

Lesson learned: Christians and conservatives are sneaky and weak.

By the way...The damage from government school started almost immediately after they were opened in the mid-1800s to early 1900s. The **PROGRESSIVE** Woodrow Wilson and the **SOCIALIST** Franklin D. Roosevelt were elected a mere one to three generations after the first socialist-collectivist-voter mob government schools opened. Why should we be surprised that our nation elected a Marxist Clinton and Obama?

41 posted on 05/19/2011 9:04:20 AM PDT by wintertime
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies ]


To: wintertime; manc; conservativebuckeye

And there you have it from BIG Billygoat Gruff :o)


42 posted on 05/19/2011 9:16:48 AM PDT by 668 - Neighbor of the Beast (America is in dire distress and nobody is lifting a finger except to strike the keyboard.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies ]

To: wintertime

look I’ve had this debate with you countless times and you always say the same.
Yet you don’;t have kids or go to a public school, irony


44 posted on 05/19/2011 9:48:21 AM PDT by manc (Hannity is a fraud , he admitted he's socially liberal on his show, he's took us for suckers)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies ]

To: wintertime

BTW, have you worked at a school?
Have you had kids go all the way through a school?

and the big one, do you know of all the people who send their kids to school and all the teachers?
Do you know of everyone’s lives

AND please tell me how one can fight an institution from the outside?

YOU CAN’T but hey if you think you have the right plan of sitting it out and not getting into a fight then so be it, like I’ve said before we’ve had all this out over a couple of years as you have with other posters


46 posted on 05/19/2011 9:52:44 AM PDT by manc (Hannity is a fraud , he admitted he's socially liberal on his show, he's took us for suckers)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies ]

To: wintertime
I am not sure how a "general statement" can be applied to "all 'X'", where 'X' is anything really. It seems to me it is more accurate to say, "this is a general statement about most 'X'". After all, that's what a general statement is: it's a statement that is most likely true in most situations and circumstances, but not all, i.e., it allows for some exceptions.

Maybe if you phrased your opening statement that way, it wouldn't engender as much resistance and/or hostility.

52 posted on 05/19/2011 11:41:17 AM PDT by FourtySeven (47)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson