Posted on 04/22/2011 1:40:43 PM PDT by outpostinmass2
As seen above, in a Facebook posting, Hackett has contended that the woman seen getting beaten in the video was actually a male cross-dresser who got into a confrontation with female patrons when he refused to leave the women’s bathroom at the Baltimore eatery. Hackett claimed that the victim faked a seizure and, when cops arrived at the restaurant, “he got right up.”
(Excerpt) Read more at thesmokinggun.com ...
I’m an atheist...
But even Genesis is consistent with evolutionary theory in that it is only HETEROSEXUAL relationships by which mammals evolve.
I’m tired of the homo fetish crowd.
If you have to tell a grown man that babies will not magically emerge from his rectum, there is some kind of mental illness they are dealing with...
I wasn’t ignoring anything.
In the post I responded to, you stated or implied you approved of the person getting an extended beating to the point of hospitalization stating “He invaded, and thus defiled, the sanctuary of the women’s restroom.”
Your statement was crystal clear. If a man invades a woman’s privacy in the restroom, you approve if the man is nearly killed in a beating as a result of that.
Sorry, I do not so approve. For someone to deserve a severe beating, there better be a lot more at stake than a woman’s privacy being invaded in the lady’s room. All that justifies is a slap in the face, assuming the guy gets the point and leaves. In this case the guy - IF IT IS A GUY SINCE I CANNOT FIND ANY CONFIRMATION THIS IS THE CASE, THE VICTIMS GENDER IS STILL COMPLETELY IN DOUBT AT THIS POINT - but if it is a guy, he was on the ground and out of the lady’s room. So long as he doesn’t get up and try to go back in, then there is NO JUSTIFICATION for beating him nearly to death until he needs hospitalization. None.
At that point it is gratuitous hate and anger. It is like beating a dog for misbehavior. At that point, these 2 WONDERFUL YOUNG LADIES just wanted to beat the living daylights out of somebody. Period.
Your greater point was lost in your approval that multiple people can gang up and beat nearly to death another individual because he was a pervert and wanted to spy on women in the women’s restroom. And even that point is nullified if this person turns out to be a transexual male and not a women. Because you know what? A transexual male is not going to be interested in spying on naked women because he is not into women. He is into men, which is why he wants to be a woman.
In the end, he has a mental disorder and anybody who thinks he deserves a beat down until he is hospitalized with brain injuries for that has problems in his own right.
I’m not going to judge you. I think you need to take a deep breath and reconsider if you really believe the beating he received (AGAIN IF IT IS A HE) was warranted just for wanting to use the woman’s room instead of men’s room.
>> “transgender?” <<
.
A bizzare word at best.
Inanimate nouns have gender, living beings have sex.
Can a nut become a bolt?
Can a pipe become a coupling?
The word is without meaning.
There are no “transgender” persons.
Every cell of a male being has X and Y chromosomes, and no surgery can ever change that fact.
Every cell of a female being has two X chromosomes and no surgery can change that either.
A thread a few months ago show a different side to FR on the subject.
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/2471057/posts?page=35
>> “Your statement was crystal clear. If a man invades a woman’s privacy in the restroom, you approve if the man is nearly killed in a beating as a result of that.” <<
.
You filled in a lot of blanks in your mind to arrive at that conclusion.
I didn’t say that I approve of anyone being beat to death. What I said, and I will not retreat from it, is that the women had a right to be outraged and revulsed at his behavior, and it was his own behavior that triggered the beating.
What led them to continue beating him so severely has to be a matter of speculation since we cannot enter their minds.
Where did I say anything about what type of sex is permitted in Christianity?
For the record, I think everyone has a bit of “sex freak” in them, meaning they like sex acts that do not relate to procreation. But the poster seems to be under the impression that “sex freaks” are less than worthy of protection, so I wanted to know what he considered to be a “sex freak.”
As to the verse you quoted, it doesnt support the point you were trying to make. Plus, its leeway, not lead way.
It wouldn't bother me in the slightest. Why? The 'guy' thinks he's a girl. S/he's not attracted to females, because s/he thinks s/he's one of them.
I'd be a whole lot more concerned about 'him' being alone with one of my boys (although, knowing my boys, he'd probably get punched if he tried anything funny).
Well, the police will say “woman” if the person has had the operation already.
Now, we have no idea what the truth is, but I just wanted to point that out.
The police report doesn’t tell us if the victim is transgendered. It will say whatever the person is now, if they have had the surgery.
So, the police report doesn’t tell us what we are trying to find out...
You know what I think?
I’ll tell you what I think ...
I’ts ALL Bush’s fault!
So, the police report doesn’t tell us what we are trying to find out...
This is true, but with all due respect, I think this whole trans-gender thing has sidetracked most of us from the central issue, which is the brutal, vicious beating those savages inflicted on a person who did little to fight back.
Exactly and thank you. The victim is the one being looked into and scrutinized and picked apart. As if the beating was only wrong if the savages did it to Snow White.
I feel like we're being led around by the nose here. Look at all the thousands of posts that have centered on the tranny aspect, when the real target is the senseless and brutal savagery of the attack.
Yes, in post 544 I said it doesn’t matter.
However that will probably be part of their defense, that a “non-female” was in the women’s bathroom...
It’s a tricky line to try though, because it leads right to “hate crime” too...
It’s a tricky line to try though, because it leads right to “hate crime” too.
The perps are hosed no matter how this thing goes, but a good prosecutor will keep the jury's attention fixed on the central act in this crime, and keep the side issues where they belong.
I couldn’t watch more than the first minute. What kind of barbarism do we find “acceptable”?
I don’t care if that was a man, woman, 600 lb gorrila, or ET with a glowing finger: Who keeps beating on someone when they are down?
An animal.
I wonder if their parents know where they are? Seriously doubt it.
“Weave” sure have. ;)
I have but think it’s ridiculous to pay that much just to have long hair.
I saw your post. I am guessing that sukersays site got it from there or vice versa. Whatever site had it first, “Real”Man got it from sukersays. Sure wasn’t from a site that said it was from the truck on the victims cars. He totally lied on that since the pic he posted had sukersays as the site. what a dummy.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.