Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

An Insect on the Evolutionary Fast Track
NYT ^ | 4/7/2011 | NICHOLAS BAKALAR

Posted on 04/09/2011 9:00:02 AM PDT by balls

It appears to be a case of high-speed evolution.

Many arthropods — the large group of invertebrates that includes insects and crustaceans — are hosts of symbiotic bacteria inherited through the maternal line. The sweet potato whitefly, an agricultural pest, has acquired a new one.

Over a six-year period, a bacterium from the genus Rickettsia swept through the whitefly population, assuring survival advantages for the whiteflies and for itself. The new research appears in the April 8 issue of Science.

“Whiteflies that have this infection have greater fitness, at least in the laboratory,” said the senior author of the study, Martha S. Hunter, a professor of entomology at the University of Arizona. “We’ll be testing whether this fitness benefit exists in the field as well.”

Compared with uninfected whiteflies, infected insects develop faster, are more likely to survive to adulthood and lay more eggs. Moreover, the bacterium induces the insects to produce a larger number of daughters, advantageous for a bacterium that is passed to the next generation only by the females.

(Excerpt) Read more at nytimes.com ...


TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: evolution; godsgravesglyphs; helixmakemineadouble
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-48 next last
More proof of evolution,
1 posted on 04/09/2011 9:00:03 AM PDT by balls
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: balls

So-o-o-o-o-....what is it evolving into?


2 posted on 04/09/2011 9:01:49 AM PDT by Texas Eagle (If it wasn't for double-standards, Liberals would have no standards at all -- Texas Eagle)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: balls
So-o-o-o-o-....what did the whitefly evolve from?

And why did it evolve into its present form?

And what will take its place to whatever job it evolved into to perfom once it has evolved into whatever it's goint to evolve into?

3 posted on 04/09/2011 9:04:20 AM PDT by Texas Eagle (If it wasn't for double-standards, Liberals would have no standards at all -- Texas Eagle)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: balls

Isn’t the correct term adaptation, not evolution?


4 posted on 04/09/2011 9:04:50 AM PDT by lurk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: lurk
Isn’t the correct term adaptation, not evolution?

What a buzzkill.

I'll bet you're the type of person who points out when people have a piece of chive sticking to their front teeth, aren't you? You seem like the type.

5 posted on 04/09/2011 9:09:05 AM PDT by Texas Eagle (If it wasn't for double-standards, Liberals would have no standards at all -- Texas Eagle)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: lurk; Red_Devil 232; Gabz; Diana in Wisconsin; JustaDumbBlonde

One thing whiteflies haven’t adapted to is wind. I put my decorative potato vines that had them on the windy deck and
they are gone.

Aphids, who can cling, are holding out OK until my next chemical temper tantrum.


6 posted on 04/09/2011 9:09:08 AM PDT by txhurl (Never let a potential gardening thread get away unscathed :))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: balls
I wonder if anyone thought to do research on whether the whitefly becomes a reservoir host for the rikettsia bug since they can cause inconvenient little infections like tyhpus, Boutonneuse fever and Rocky Mountain Spotted Fever, all of which can be fatal.
7 posted on 04/09/2011 9:10:00 AM PDT by NWFLConservative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: lurk
Precisely.
8 posted on 04/09/2011 9:15:33 AM PDT by NWFLConservative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Texas Eagle
The bacterium evolved. The article erroneously implies the whitefly evolved.
9 posted on 04/09/2011 9:25:55 AM PDT by Rudder (The Main Stream Media is Our Enemy---get used to it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: StayAt HomeMother; Ernest_at_the_Beach; 1010RD; 21twelve; 24Karet; 2ndDivisionVet; 31R1O; ...

· GGG managers are SunkenCiv, StayAt HomeMother, and Ernest_at_the_Beach ·
· join list or digest · view topics · view or post blog · bookmark · post a topic · subscribe ·

 
 Antiquity Journal
 & archive
 Archaeologica
 Archaeology
 Archaeology Channel
 BAR
 Bronze Age Forum
 Discover
 Dogpile
 Eurekalert
 Google
 LiveScience
 Mirabilis.ca
 Nat Geographic
 PhysOrg
 Science Daily
 Science News
 Texas AM
 Yahoo
 Excerpt, or Link only?
 


Thanks balls. Hmm, I should work on the Digest.

To all -- please ping me to other topics which are appropriate for the GGG list.
 

· History topic · history keyword · archaeology keyword · paleontology keyword ·
· Science topic · science keyword · Books/Literature topic · pages keyword ·


10 posted on 04/09/2011 9:30:58 AM PDT by SunkenCiv (Thanks Cincinna for this link -- http://www.friendsofitamar.org)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: lurk
“Isn’t the correct term adaptation, not evolution?”

I don't know the scientific difference and think evolution is continual adaptation.

11 posted on 04/09/2011 9:31:44 AM PDT by balls (0 lies like a Muslim (Google "taqiyya"))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Texas Eagle

Isn’t all this talk about ‘whiteflies’ racist?


12 posted on 04/09/2011 9:32:05 AM PDT by PzLdr ("The Emperor is not as forgiving as I am" - Darth Vader)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: balls
The controversy over Evolution is centered around the idea that one species might evolve into a different species. Down that road, we would need to see a creature from one genus evolve into a different genus. One class evolve into a different class. These are monumental changes and nothing of the sort has ever been demonstrated.

When we see adaptation within a single species, we shrug and say, So What? This is not the same thing as saying everything started from a single-celled lifeform.

Adaptation is boring and proves nothing at all.

13 posted on 04/09/2011 9:38:46 AM PDT by ClearCase_guy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: balls; lurk
Well, I always thought that one pretty good definition of evolution was change in gene frequency. Speciation occurs when populations or sub-populations are isolated (genetically) from their sisters and brothers over a long period of time.

Thanks for posting...interesting.

14 posted on 04/09/2011 9:40:10 AM PDT by Pharmboy (What always made the state a hell has been that man tried to make it heaven-Hoelderlin)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: lurk

Uhmmm...hate to burst your bubble, but evolution is adaptation. Adaptation is what causes organisms to evolve.

I don’t understand the resistance some conservatives have toward evolution. After all, we humans evolved from primitive cave dewllers into the advanced civilization we have today. Human history is a story of evolution.


15 posted on 04/09/2011 9:42:03 AM PDT by Wolfstar ("If you would win a man to your cause, first convince him that you are his friend." Abraham Lincoln)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: PzLdr

Well, it’s at least fly-ist.


16 posted on 04/09/2011 9:45:26 AM PDT by Texas Eagle (If it wasn't for double-standards, Liberals would have no standards at all -- Texas Eagle)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: balls

So, now the whitefly is (drum roll) STILL a whitefly. Now if it had “evolved” into a new type of bird - that would truly be proof of real macro-evolution in the materialist sense.


17 posted on 04/09/2011 9:45:27 AM PDT by Nevadan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Rudder
The bacterium evolved.

Oh. Well, the same questions apply. What did it evolve from? Why did it evolve into its present form? What will take its place to the job it presently does when it evolves into whatever it evolves into? What will it evolve into?

18 posted on 04/09/2011 9:47:41 AM PDT by Texas Eagle (If it wasn't for double-standards, Liberals would have no standards at all -- Texas Eagle)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: neverdem

ping


19 posted on 04/09/2011 9:55:08 AM PDT by GOPJ (Understanding the Koran: http://www.citizenwarrior.com/2009/05/terrifying-brilliance-of-islam.html)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Wolfstar

I hate to burst your bubble, but even the most die hard creationist does not deny evolution within a species - it is the supposed evolution between species (macro-evolution) that is the true controversy. The fact that there is variations within a species is no proof that it occurs between species.


20 posted on 04/09/2011 9:56:04 AM PDT by Nevadan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-48 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson