Posted on 04/09/2011 9:00:02 AM PDT by balls
It appears to be a case of high-speed evolution.
Many arthropods the large group of invertebrates that includes insects and crustaceans are hosts of symbiotic bacteria inherited through the maternal line. The sweet potato whitefly, an agricultural pest, has acquired a new one.
Over a six-year period, a bacterium from the genus Rickettsia swept through the whitefly population, assuring survival advantages for the whiteflies and for itself. The new research appears in the April 8 issue of Science.
Whiteflies that have this infection have greater fitness, at least in the laboratory, said the senior author of the study, Martha S. Hunter, a professor of entomology at the University of Arizona. Well be testing whether this fitness benefit exists in the field as well.
Compared with uninfected whiteflies, infected insects develop faster, are more likely to survive to adulthood and lay more eggs. Moreover, the bacterium induces the insects to produce a larger number of daughters, advantageous for a bacterium that is passed to the next generation only by the females.
(Excerpt) Read more at nytimes.com ...
So-o-o-o-o-....what is it evolving into?
And why did it evolve into its present form?
And what will take its place to whatever job it evolved into to perfom once it has evolved into whatever it's goint to evolve into?
Isn’t the correct term adaptation, not evolution?
What a buzzkill.
I'll bet you're the type of person who points out when people have a piece of chive sticking to their front teeth, aren't you? You seem like the type.
One thing whiteflies haven’t adapted to is wind. I put my decorative potato vines that had them on the windy deck and
they are gone.
Aphids, who can cling, are holding out OK until my next chemical temper tantrum.
· join list or digest · view topics · view or post blog · bookmark · post a topic · subscribe · |
|||
Antiquity Journal & archive Archaeologica Archaeology Archaeology Channel BAR Bronze Age Forum Discover Dogpile Eurekalert LiveScience Mirabilis.ca Nat Geographic PhysOrg Science Daily Science News Texas AM Yahoo Excerpt, or Link only? |
|
||
· Science topic · science keyword · Books/Literature topic · pages keyword · |
I don't know the scientific difference and think evolution is continual adaptation.
Isn’t all this talk about ‘whiteflies’ racist?
When we see adaptation within a single species, we shrug and say, So What? This is not the same thing as saying everything started from a single-celled lifeform.
Adaptation is boring and proves nothing at all.
Thanks for posting...interesting.
Uhmmm...hate to burst your bubble, but evolution is adaptation. Adaptation is what causes organisms to evolve.
I don’t understand the resistance some conservatives have toward evolution. After all, we humans evolved from primitive cave dewllers into the advanced civilization we have today. Human history is a story of evolution.
Well, it’s at least fly-ist.
So, now the whitefly is (drum roll) STILL a whitefly. Now if it had “evolved” into a new type of bird - that would truly be proof of real macro-evolution in the materialist sense.
Oh. Well, the same questions apply. What did it evolve from? Why did it evolve into its present form? What will take its place to the job it presently does when it evolves into whatever it evolves into? What will it evolve into?
ping
I hate to burst your bubble, but even the most die hard creationist does not deny evolution within a species - it is the supposed evolution between species (macro-evolution) that is the true controversy. The fact that there is variations within a species is no proof that it occurs between species.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.