Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Nuclear power is always unsafe, says Greenpeace
news.com.au ^

Posted on 03/13/2011 4:54:10 PM PDT by Sub-Driver

Nuclear power is always unsafe, says Greenpeace

* From: AAP * March 14, 2011 10:22AM

ENVIRONMENTALISTS say the possibly catastrophic failure of a Japanese nuclear reactor shows that nuclear power can never be safe.

Two reactors at the Fukushima plant in north-eastern Japan have been damaged by the devastating earthquake which struck nearby on Friday, and at least one is in danger of meltdown.

Radiation has been released into the air after an explosion at one reactor, and although authorities have said it is not intense enough to affect human health, they have ordered evacuations of people living within 20km.

"This proves once and for all that nuclear power cannot ever be safe," Greenpeace campaigns head Steve Campbell said today.

"Japan's nuclear plants were built with the latest technology, specifically to withstand natural disasters, yet we still face potential meltdown," he said in a statement.

Greenpeace was also concerned about the lack of information about the total amount of radiation already released, and whether the ponds for spent radioactive fuel - outside the containment area of the reactor - were secure.

"We request that Japan's government share this information with the public immediately," he said.

(Excerpt) Read more at news.com.au ...


TOPICS: Culture/Society; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: bwr; fukushima; greenpeace; nuclearpower; terrorists; terrororganization
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-65 next last
It was 9.0 on the Richter Scale you morons.........
1 posted on 03/13/2011 4:54:12 PM PDT by Sub-Driver
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver

What you said.


2 posted on 03/13/2011 4:55:46 PM PDT by Conservative4Ever (Man the pitchforks and torches.......let the revolution begin)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver

But coal power melts the polar bears!


3 posted on 03/13/2011 4:56:47 PM PDT by DBrow
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver

In my estimation, Greenpeace (a vile anarchist outfit) poses a far greater danger to our country than any nuclear plant. We’d be a poverty-stricken, third world cesspool if Greenpeace had their way. And that’s likely just what they want.


4 posted on 03/13/2011 4:57:10 PM PDT by re_nortex (DP...that's what I like about Texas.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver

It’s “unsafe” because idiots like Greenpeace manage to squeeze excessive regulations out of governments that force us to use old technology. New technology is safer, far more efficient and can operate on far smaller amounts of nuclear material.

The answer is more nuclear plants.


5 posted on 03/13/2011 4:58:13 PM PDT by cripplecreek (Remember the River Raisin! (look it up))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver

so are candles and campfires, you Luddite hippies!


6 posted on 03/13/2011 4:58:45 PM PDT by bigbob
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver

Windpower and solar power are hazardous to animals too.


7 posted on 03/13/2011 5:00:24 PM PDT by a fool in paradise (The biggest waste of brainpower is to want to change something that's not changeable. -Albert Brooks)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bigbob

What’s orange and looks good on a hippie?

Fire.


8 posted on 03/13/2011 5:01:14 PM PDT by a fool in paradise (The biggest waste of brainpower is to want to change something that's not changeable. -Albert Brooks)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver
(((YAWN))))

This is the first phrase the Greenpeace maggots are taught to regurgitate in Pain In The Ass 101.

9 posted on 03/13/2011 5:01:22 PM PDT by FlingWingFlyer (Look for the union label and just say, NO!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver

I was wondering how long it would take the dipsticks to come up with this. They won’t be satisfied until we are all sitting in caves in animal skins.

Wait they don’t want us skinning animals. I guess we would sit around the caves naked. Friggin Morons.


10 posted on 03/13/2011 5:01:27 PM PDT by Venturer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver

And so is coal, oil, gas, hydroelectric, wind, solar and geothermal.


11 posted on 03/13/2011 5:01:57 PM PDT by Brilliant
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver

What´s living? Safe?


12 posted on 03/13/2011 5:04:31 PM PDT by onedoug (If)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Venturer

Global warming next...........


13 posted on 03/13/2011 5:04:31 PM PDT by Sub-Driver (Proud member of the Republican wing of the Republican Party)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver

Greem peas can never be safe.


14 posted on 03/13/2011 5:04:58 PM PDT by tet68 ( " We would not die in that man's company, that fears his fellowship to die with us...." Henry V.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver

Life is unsafe and 100% fatal. Worrying about it makes it really suck. Greenpeace sucks!


15 posted on 03/13/2011 5:06:33 PM PDT by Bryanw92 (We don't need to win elections. We need to win a revolution.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver

So is walking down wind of a Greenpeace person.

I would rather live next door to a nuke.


16 posted on 03/13/2011 5:06:45 PM PDT by hadaclueonce ("Endeavor to persevere.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver
"This proves once and for all that nuclear power cannot ever be safe," Greenpeace campaigns head Steve Campbell said today.

Everything, and I mean everything, on this Earth has some level of risk. I quite frankly am tired of these liberal demigogs who are trying to create "Heaven on Earth" by eliminating as much risk as possible.

17 posted on 03/13/2011 5:07:45 PM PDT by mlocher (USA is a sovereign nation)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: a fool in paradise

ROFLMAO!! That made my day and will make the rounds of office in the morning.


18 posted on 03/13/2011 5:08:03 PM PDT by Bryanw92 (We don't need to win elections. We need to win a revolution.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver

Actually, just the opposite is proved. Fukushima is just about the worst case scenario that could ever happen at any nuclear power plant - i.e. an insignificant amount of radioactive leakage without the ability to damage the health of anyone. These nuts are slandering the cleanest, safest, and most environmentally friendly power production method available.


19 posted on 03/13/2011 5:10:12 PM PDT by eclecticEel (Life, Liberty, and the Pursuit of Happiness: 7/4/1776 - 3/21/2010)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: hadaclueonce

>>I would rather live next door to a nuke.

I used to live 125 feet from a nuke...that was operated by 20 year olds...and there were 16 Poseidon missiles in between me and the nuke. I laugh at Greenpeace and their pathetic fears!!


20 posted on 03/13/2011 5:10:57 PM PDT by Bryanw92 (We don't need to win elections. We need to win a revolution.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-65 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson