Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 02/13/2011 10:09:30 AM PST by NormsRevenge
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-63 next last
To: NormsRevenge
Elections have consequences.

We would not be seeing this headline if Pelosi was still in the Chair.

28 posted on 02/13/2011 10:42:27 AM PST by Siena Dreaming
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: NormsRevenge
Elections have consequences.

We would not be seeing this headline if Pelosi was still in the Chair.

29 posted on 02/13/2011 10:42:40 AM PST by Siena Dreaming
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: NormsRevenge
Elections have consequences.

We would not be seeing this headline if Pelosi was still in the Chair.

30 posted on 02/13/2011 10:42:45 AM PST by Siena Dreaming
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: NormsRevenge
Think about it. The last time we had a truly balanced sheet was under Andrew Jackson.

It is interesting to note that he hated paper money, and now has his portrait on the $20 bill.

31 posted on 02/13/2011 10:48:48 AM PST by He Rides A White Horse (unite)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: NormsRevenge
I have a plan that will cut 9 thousand gazillion trillion in spending over the next umpty-leven thousand years. It's even less painful than Ah'bama's "plan."
32 posted on 02/13/2011 10:49:52 AM PST by Thom Pain (November 2, 2010, Step ONE. Repeal 17th, Step TWO. 11/6/2012, Step THREE)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: NormsRevenge
Cut 1.1 Trillion in Ten Years? That's the same piddly shit GOP is proposing right now for this year's budget......I'll tell you, these buttwipes need to be swept up and pissed out completely. We are suffering from a case of 'indulgent parent' syndrome refusing to believe we have a child hooked on crack.

That's like saying, "I'll just apply for 10 new credit cards (to transfer balances to) instead of the 20 I would have done."

33 posted on 02/13/2011 10:56:41 AM PST by Gaffer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: NormsRevenge

So what about this year’s budget? Hmmmmm???????

Obama still doesn’t get it.


34 posted on 02/13/2011 10:57:07 AM PST by fatnotlazy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: NormsRevenge

And where are the cuts in each division and department of government? Maybe start at the top with Obama’s salary and perks and work the way down. Nah! Obama said we would have to sacrifice; he didn’t say HE would have to sacrifice.


35 posted on 02/13/2011 10:59:06 AM PST by fatnotlazy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: NormsRevenge

Sorry for the triple.


37 posted on 02/13/2011 11:02:00 AM PST by Siena Dreaming
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: NormsRevenge

And Drudge has on his site that Obama wants to cut the defense budget by $78 billion...

http://www.reuters.com/article/2011/02/13/us-usa-budget-obama-idUSTRE71B1QU20110213


42 posted on 02/13/2011 11:13:48 AM PST by Southnsoul
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: NormsRevenge

He is such a kidder. Let’s throw Obama out.


44 posted on 02/13/2011 11:16:26 AM PST by freekitty (Give me back my conservative vote; then find me a real conservative to vote for)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: NormsRevenge

Over 10 years, they cause the damage and then try to insult your intelligence. Try again a##hat! The house needs to Defund the EPA, DOE, and the UN for starters, impress me!


45 posted on 02/13/2011 11:16:26 AM PST by ronnie raygun (V)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: NormsRevenge
President Barack Obama's proposed budget for fiscal 2012 will seek to cut the record federal deficit by $1.1 trillion over the next 10 years

So many people like to say this clown is smart. I need to ask: At what(!)? He sure is an idiot at arithmatic. $1.1 trillion in ten years isn't a drop in the ocean, in light if 1.5 trillion annual deficits.

I remember when the Democrats wanted to tar and feather Reagan and run him out of town on a rail for deficits that were tiny and manageable by comparison. This was while Reagan's policies were creating an expansion unheard of in American history, which is likely to say,. unheard of in the history of the world.

The only possible reason for Obama to propose a trillion in savings in ten years is because his real goal is to bankrupt the United States and turn it into a third world country.

If the Democrats nominate this idiot to run for reelection it's only because they share is vision of a world without that shining city on the hill.

48 posted on 02/13/2011 11:20:53 AM PST by stevem
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: NormsRevenge

50 posted on 02/13/2011 11:28:38 AM PST by Iron Munro ("Our country's founders cherished liberty, not democracy." -- Ron Paul)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: NormsRevenge

Given that our deficits are projected to total 12T over the next ten years, his proposal is a joke.

Moreover he commits the same sin as our Republican leadership, i.e. he is making promises for congresses and presidents not yet elected. Most of his proposed “cuts” come after he has no ability to make them stick.


51 posted on 02/13/2011 11:31:01 AM PST by MontaniSemperLiberi (Moutaineers are Always Free)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: NormsRevenge
FIRST he wants those evil ole nasty Republicans to go after the “entitlement” programs, then he will jump on board. This is what passes for LEADERSHIP in the Admin in today's RAT led environment.
52 posted on 02/13/2011 11:35:47 AM PST by Cheerio (Barry Hussein Soetoro-0bama=The Complete Destruction of American Capitalism)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: NormsRevenge

Unfortunately, most of America will buy this. After all, they voted for him.


53 posted on 02/13/2011 11:40:55 AM PST by truthkeeper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: NormsRevenge
So he's planning on cutting less than 3%? Doesn't sound like much, so they say 1.1 Trillion over ten years, when spending will probably be about 35-45 Trillion over ten years.
55 posted on 02/13/2011 11:44:56 AM PST by PghBaldy (Like the Ft Hood Killer, James Earl Ray was just stressed when he killed MLK Jr.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: NormsRevenge

JHC..just over a hundred billion a year. WOW! We’re really getting to it now aint we ears?


56 posted on 02/13/2011 11:46:58 AM PST by crz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: NormsRevenge
Actually, the Executive ONLY submits a budget request. The House does the cutting.

I would not trust 0marxo one iota AND would ignore his chicken scratch budget -he simply plays politics here and his budget probably involves a shell game. He makes headlines by doing nothing, headlines he can speak to on his teleprompted hope and change socialist freak show...

The House should just do as the House sees best.

60 posted on 02/13/2011 11:51:03 AM PST by DBeers (†)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-63 next last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson