Moslems have a monoculture all ready to roll!
German Chancellor Angela Merkel (C) listens to British Prime Minister David Cameron (L) during the 47th Munich Security Conference in the southern German city of Munich. Cameron condemned his country's long-standing policy of multiculturalism as a failure Saturday, saying it was partly to blame for fostering Islamist extremism. (AFP/POOL/Guido Bergmann)
Sooo . . . . My momma taught me to clean up any messes I made. How do the Brits plan to do this now?
I know how I’d do it, but it wouldn’t win me any liberal or Islamic friends.
Cameron rocks. I watched his presentation and he has some mega cajones!
“British Prime Minister David Cameron condemned his country’s long-standing policy of multiculturalism as a failure”
Well, obviously the guy is a very slow learner, but let’s hope the Brits are starting to awaken in time to save their country.
“Signalling a marked change in policy towards ethnic and religious minorities, he urged a “more active, muscular liberalism” where equal rights, the rule of law, freedom of speech and democracy were actively promoted.”
The “marked change” they need is mass deportations and a halt to all third-world immigration.
Or, in the words of those who have encouraged the multicultural program, "Mission accomplished."
Multiculturalism erodes the national identity of the native culture, leaving it vulnerable to those who are unapologetically certain of their own identity.
The British and the Germans are starting to draw the line on their Muslim “immigrants.” That they are throwing the politically correct “multiculturalism” under the bus — and siding with Mubarak — at least until he can transition out in Egypt UNLIKE Obama who wants him out NOW — shows they no longer trust the Obama regime, and they no longer believe he will be there for them should things get bad. Nor can we expect them to be there for us, so long as Obama remains in the White House, and Progressives/Democrats in charge of the Government.
"All this leaves some young Muslims feeling rootless. And the search for something to belong to and believe in can lead them to this extremist ideology,"
Their own policy backfired and now is coming back to cause harm to their country.
If immigrants cannot or will not assimilate, its really just an invasion. Throw them out!
This is great news. The Brits are pretty liberal compared to the U.S. so this is a sign of hope. I hope they can get the UK back in time, it’s pretty rough in western europe, I know first hand. That’s what PC thinking got them, a looming disaster.
Failure? Depends on the culture.
The UK is making strides to privatize healthcare and now dropping multiculturalism...will the media here even cover it? The Dem’s are in a race to make us Europe before Europe goes to pot or turns around.
Anyway, the left will probably set about painting Cameron like Geert Wilders.
“
British Prime Minister David Cameron condemned his country’s
long-standing policy of multiculturalism as a failure Saturday
“
I’ve seen Cameron a couple of times in “question” time with the UK
Parliament.
Shame we can’t vote for him to be President of The United States of The USA.
Cameron is clearly running intellectually at about 100 percent faster
than Obama (and many other potential 2012 Presidential candidates for
the office of US President).
Multi-culturalism is foothold for foreign governments to meddle in other’s politics. Witness the mexican meddling in our affairs.
Here is a big part of the problem. USCIS.
USCIS Ombudsman Doesn’t Understand the Point of Numerical Limits
By David North, February 2, 2011
Congress for close to 90 years now has voted to numerically limit some kinds of immigration. The point is that the U.S. does not want to be overcrowded the way Egypt is.
The open borders people and greedy employers have long resisted numerical limits, and have often figured clever ways to avoid them, or to define away the limits that they cannot change. Witness the games played with H-1B ceilings in recent years.
Unfortunately, an arm of U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services, the Office of the Ombudsman, has missed the point, too.
It recently released a statement in which it openly regretted “unused family-based visas”:
During FY 2009 and FY 2010, usage of family-based visas has been exceptionally low, especially among spouses and children of green card holders . . . In FY 20009 approximately 10,000 family-based visas were unused . . .
The document continues:
Despite the fact that more family members are becoming eligible, demand for family-based visas remains weak. While efforts are underway to facilitate maximum utilization, a significant number of family-based visas may again go unused in FY 2010.
Instead of leaving things alone, the Ombudsman reported that the Office has “worked alongside USCIS and the Department of State to monitor family-based visa usage in FY 2010. To enable more family-based visa applicants to become eligible for final processing, the Visa Bulletin cut-off dates have been accelerating significantly.”
In short, the Ombudsman’s Office is busily trying to manipulate a very complex system to make sure that every conceivable family visa is issued to some potential immigrant, whether there is much demand for them or not. Unused family visas “fall down”, in the jargon of the immigration business, to people in the employment-based categories, so “unused” is something of a misnomer.
The byproduct of this all this activity is to change the mix of incoming immigrants in a manner that will surely lower the average per capita income of the arriving immigrant cohorts, because studies show that people on employment visas earn more money than people on family visas, a factor not discussed in the Ombudsman’s message.
While I have no problem with the government facilitating immigration along the lines set by Congress, it should not actively promote immigration, particularly of low-income people, which is exactly what this unit of USCIS is doing.
http://www.cis.org/north/uscis-ombudsman-numerical-limits
Hurrah PM Cameron! You have the courage and strength to state the truth about a system which _insists_ on vocal and then violent jihad to overcome every nation on earth.
Note, the true intent of a religion is not what the man in the street, the average believer or even a majority of believers espouse. The doctrine of it is revealed by its high level teachers, learned ones who study it and know its history and the fullness of its message. They say clearly jihad is required and it means killing, if not listened to; lying to kifar is required behavior. Duh to so many people.
Although a mild rebuke the excesses of Multiculturalism, Cameron speech was pure elite liberalism.
It didn’t say that the native Brits have a right to their land culture and history. Rather it bemoaned the failure of Muslims to fit in with liberalism. Cameron has no problem with increasing the number of Muslims in Europe so long as they pretend to be liberal. And in his speech, he basically said that since we European elites can suppress nationalist groups and fascists, we should have the right to suppress the most extreme Islamists.
Hats off to you, Mr. Cameron!
Americans, wake up! I say, if you put a hyphen in your national identity, GET OUT! Go to the country and culture that comes first in your identity and your allegiance.