Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 02/03/2011 7:25:34 AM PST by Matchett-PI
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-28 next last
To: Matchett-PI

This will panic the Crats.


2 posted on 02/03/2011 7:29:07 AM PST by screaminsunshine (Surfers Rule)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Matchett-PI

Yep, go faster, Ken. Make them sweat. :-)


3 posted on 02/03/2011 7:30:03 AM PST by writer33 (Mark Levin Is The Constitutional Engine Of Conservatism)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Matchett-PI

Like heating up the floor under a swarm of cockroaches.


6 posted on 02/03/2011 7:32:43 AM PST by Steely Tom (Obama goes on long after the thrill of Obama is gone)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Matchett-PI
Currently, state governments and private businesses are being forced to expend enormous amounts of resources to prepare to implement a law that, in the end, may be declared unconstitutional

People are saying that it is unconstitutional for the Federal Government to require citizens to buy something.

I'm pretty sure that there was a time when most felt it was unconstitutional for the Federal Government to force the States to buy anything.

ML/NJ

8 posted on 02/03/2011 7:34:04 AM PST by ml/nj
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Matchett-PI

That ruling the other day, the one that deemed the Health Care bill to be unconstitutional, was like a light being turned on while the cockroaches were playing. Look at them go...

I’d love to see this slapped down by the SCOTUS today. That’s not possible, but soon...

Can you sand “RAID”... LOL


9 posted on 02/03/2011 7:34:20 AM PST by DoughtyOne (All hail the Kenyan Prince Obama, Lord of the Skid-mark, constantly soiling himself and our nation.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Matchett-PI
The Politcal Opportunist in me wants this issue to be still hanging out there for the 2012 election-- the better to torture Democrats.

The Patriot in me wants Obamacare killed ASAP.

My only fear is that the SCOTUS may punk out and not kill it. But then again, that would keep the issue alive.

11 posted on 02/03/2011 7:36:21 AM PST by Lysandru
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Matchett-PI

Does the Justice Dept. have to agree to Fast Track?


12 posted on 02/03/2011 7:36:39 AM PST by Old Retired Army Guy (tHE)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Matchett-PI
0bamacare had SCOTUS written all over it from the get-go. These cases should be fast-tracked, since the taxes commence years ahead of the actual "care."

I am also waiting with eager anticipation to see what Kagan does about recusing herself.

14 posted on 02/03/2011 7:38:49 AM PST by Miss_Meyet (Every dog has its day. Some days are longer than others.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Matchett-PI
Where is the Supreme Court in all of this.. licking themselves or others?..
Are they asleep?.. on another planet?.. playing checkers?..
Where are they.. should they be SLAPPED AWAKE?...

-OR- was Alito and Roberts put in there by George Bush to hamstring the court..
To make them worthless and elite?..

Both Bush's as President were ridden by democrats like rented donkeys.. its true..
Cloward-Piven seems to have been very well thought out..
From the Clintoons to the Bush's to the Obamanoids..

16 posted on 02/03/2011 7:42:13 AM PST by hosepipe (This propaganda has been edited to include some fully orbed hyperbole....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Matchett-PI
Forgive me if this has been covered but I have a question and am hoping someone who knows the answer will see this and respond. My question is in two parts:

If the Health Care bill is ruled "unconstituional" by a state judge, and/or...eventually...the Supreme Court - then would/will it be necessary to hold a vote in the Senate to repeal it?

And now...in Florida, since the HC Bill has been proclaimed unconstituional in that state -- should Florida's senators even vote (and have a countable vote)on something that is not applicable in their state? It seems to me that they can hardly approve/support or vote to repeal the bill that has been deemed unconstituional in their own state.

Isn't voting on something that is denied to have any enforceable merit by our Constitution just a waste of taxpayers' money and senators' time anyway?

20 posted on 02/03/2011 7:44:45 AM PST by CitizenM (If we ever forget that we're one nation under GOD, then we will be a nation gone under.-Ronald Re)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Matchett-PI

Once again, well done, AG Cuccinelli. Let’s get this matter settled and toss 0bamaCare to the ash heap of history.


22 posted on 02/03/2011 7:49:14 AM PST by ScottinVA (The West needs to act NOW to aggressively treat its metastasizing islaminoma!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Matchett-PI

Go Ken GO!


27 posted on 02/03/2011 7:51:03 AM PST by Bigun ("It is difficult to free fools from the chains they revere." Voltaire)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Matchett-PI

‘The Justice Department has said it does not support putting the court battle on the fast track”

but of course the lying basxtards


29 posted on 02/03/2011 7:53:48 AM PST by driftdiver (I could eat it raw, but why do that when I have a fire.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Matchett-PI
To stop ObamaCare we will have to fast track the appeal process bypassing the intermediate courts.

The Obama administration has already said it is going to ignore the Florida decision. They are going to establish the bureaucracies, collect the fines, and do other things to establish ObamaCare’s supporting infrastructure. Once that happens the infrastructure will remain and continue to function because it is too costly/difficult to dismantle.

Can anyone name a singe governmental infrastructure that has ever been dismantled?

32 posted on 02/03/2011 7:58:11 AM PST by Nip (TANSTAAFL)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Matchett-PI
I had a response to my question in another thread regarding the effect that an injunction against enforcement issued by Judge Vinson in Florida would have on the process. The responder stated that though the Judge's decision applied only to his district, an injunction would apply nationwide. How accurate is he?
36 posted on 02/03/2011 8:00:59 AM PST by Tonytitan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Matchett-PI

The USSC is pretty much compelled to intervene when there are conflicting lower court rulings. So far we have 4 rulings with three different results:

1) The law is Constitutional (x2)
2) The individual mandate is not Constitutional, but the rest of the law may stand
3) The individual mandate is not Constitutional, and the entire law is voided

However, these are District court rulings. Under normal circumstances, the USSC would wait until there are conflicting Circuit court rulings. I just don’t know if these can be considered normal circumstances given the breadth and impact of the law in question.


37 posted on 02/03/2011 8:01:18 AM PST by kevkrom (De-fund Obamacare in 2011, repeal in 2013!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Matchett-PI

“The Justice Department has said it does not support putting the court battle on the fast track”

No surprise here. zero is praying to allah that he wins in 2012 and Kennedy retires or dies so that he can appoint a Marxist to uphold unlimited federal power.

The Congress should pass a resolution that calls upon the SCOTUS to expedite the review process along with the other repeal and de-funding efforts.


49 posted on 02/03/2011 8:15:08 AM PST by grumpygresh (Democrats delenda est)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Matchett-PI

Agreed. Get it fast tracked. I saw today where insurers and health care providers are still going full steam ahead anyways, not allowing some judge to put the brakes on the “law of the land”. Read that in the morning Gannett rag.


54 posted on 02/03/2011 8:23:10 AM PST by b4its2late (Ignorance allows liberalism to prosper.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Matchett-PI
I keep saying that this guy is going to make a great AG for President Palin.
57 posted on 02/03/2011 8:27:56 AM PST by HereInTheHeartland (Vote like Obama is on the ballot)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Matchett-PI
The Justice Department has said it does not support putting the court battle on the fast track

I'll bet not. Go Ken.

64 posted on 02/03/2011 8:53:35 AM PST by nina0113
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-28 next last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson