Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Pete King bill would ban guns within 1,000 feet of lawmakers
Politico ^ | 1/11/11 | SHIRA TOEPLITZ

Posted on 01/11/2011 10:16:18 AM PST by Redcloak

Rep. Peter King (R-N.Y.), one of the few pro-gun control Republicans in the House, wants to make it illegal for someone to carry a gun within 1,000 feet of certain high-ranking federal officials, including members of Congress.

“It is imperative that we do all that we can to give law enforcement the tools they need to ensure the safety of New Yorkers and prevent an attack before it happens,” said King, who is chairman of the House Homeland Security Committee, during a press conference in New York.

(Excerpt) Read more at politico.com ...


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Crime/Corruption
KEYWORDS: banglist; congress; control; democrats; giffords; gun; gungrabbingrino; king; ny; reichstagfire; rino
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100 ... 141-157 next last
To: Redcloak
If Rep. King truly feels this way, he should lock himself in an interior bathroom and stay there until his term expires. One of his Long Island constituents should send him a copy of one of John Lott's valuable and perceptive books on gun control for him to read while he's holed up in his porcelain euphemism.

Laws like the one he proposes will not inconvenience or deter any potential assassins.

61 posted on 01/11/2011 10:29:54 AM PST by Mobties (Let the markets work! Reduce the government footprint!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Redcloak

Contact: http://peteking.house.gov/email.shtml
Post #6 seems suitable.


62 posted on 01/11/2011 10:30:05 AM PST by mirkwood (Palin-Bolton 2012)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Redcloak

This is transcends normal stupidity, and soars into the lofty heights of meta-stupid.

How in the world could you avoid breaking this law, as a lawful gun owner? What if the politician drove past you? Went to the same restaurant? Walked towards you?

And how would it deter someone that was trying to kill a politician? Either they are crazy or they’re okay with the risk of getting caught or killed. What’s another slap on the wrist going to do when you’re looking at a murder of a government official charge?


63 posted on 01/11/2011 10:30:25 AM PST by Steel Wolf ("There are moderate Muslims, but Islam itself is not moderate." - Ibn Warraq)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cumbo78

That’s the edge of a very slippery slope. Should doctors be able to say who is or isn’t allowed to own a gun? Suppose your doctor thinks that the very desire to own a gun is a sign of insanity; then what would you do?


64 posted on 01/11/2011 10:30:31 AM PST by Redcloak (What's your zombie plan?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Redcloak

This is exactly the opposite of what is needed.

Had someone at the event on Saturday been armed, the shooter could have been promptly dispatched, saving lives.


65 posted on 01/11/2011 10:30:45 AM PST by B Knotts (Just another Tenther)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Redcloak

IIRC, there are laws against shooting people, but that didn’t deter Loughner.

Laws are only observed by law abiding people.

If someone is intent on doing harm to another, such as a politician, King’s law is probably not going to deter the individual.


66 posted on 01/11/2011 10:30:57 AM PST by TomGuy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Redcloak

Yes if we outlaw guns within 1000 feet of lawmakers then only outlaws will have guns within 1000 feet of lawmakers.


67 posted on 01/11/2011 10:31:02 AM PST by Rippin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Redcloak

Maybe we should make it illegal to shoot people.


68 posted on 01/11/2011 10:31:06 AM PST by Interesting Times (WinterSoldier.com. SwiftVets.com. ToSetTheRecordStraight.com.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jolla

The fish rots from the head down...DC is the head of the fish!

When you have people this stupid making policies it only makes sense that a good portion of this country is even dumber.


69 posted on 01/11/2011 10:31:26 AM PST by panthermom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: N3WBI3
OK, you're crazy.

If you want your gun don’t go to the event!

And that's the kind of thinking that gets filed with the "if you don't like having naked pics taken of your children, then don't fly". Just keep bleating while they continue to chip away at rights that used be protected by our Constitution.
70 posted on 01/11/2011 10:32:02 AM PST by Zarro (Hands off Our Junk!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: mockingbyrd
Is it going to cut both ways, no armed guards allowed within 1000 feet of congressmen?

There you go.

71 posted on 01/11/2011 10:32:06 AM PST by Interesting Times (WinterSoldier.com. SwiftVets.com. ToSetTheRecordStraight.com.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: Redcloak

King has some good points on other issues, but this isn’t one of them. He, like other anti-gun types fail to understand that the insane DON’T ABIDE BY THE RULES!!


72 posted on 01/11/2011 10:32:06 AM PST by ScottinVA (The West needs to act NOW to aggressively treat its metastasizing islaminoma!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: newheart
I think maybe we should ban politicians from being within 1000 feet of guns. Or talking about them. Or legislating about them. Or prohibiting the free exercise thereof.

Hmm....interesting concept. I'm kind of surprised that nobody has come up with this idea before.
/sarc

73 posted on 01/11/2011 10:32:17 AM PST by Tucsonican
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Osage Orange

You beat me. I was going to post the same.

I’d like a bill that bans people who intend on killing me from coming within 1000 feet of me.


74 posted on 01/11/2011 10:32:32 AM PST by bolobaby
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies]

To: N3WBI3
Call me crazy but I don’t think this is an awful law

Since there is already laws against shooting people, why do you think this one would make them safer?

And why elevate the safety of lawmakers above those of citizens?

Crazy!

75 posted on 01/11/2011 10:32:53 AM PST by thackney (life is fragile, handle with prayer (biblein90days.org))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: Redcloak
So we can mortar them instead? Awesome.
76 posted on 01/11/2011 10:33:03 AM PST by RichInOC (No! BAD Rich! (What'd I say?) (No actual politicians were harmed in the making of this post.))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Redcloak

Had the perpetrator not been tackled and disarmed the packers present at the event Saturday would have been barred from taking him down and stopping his carnage.

Another attempt to solve a symptom instead of a problem.


77 posted on 01/11/2011 10:33:42 AM PST by jimfree (In 2012 Sarah Palin will continue to have more relevant quality executive experience than B. Obama.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Redcloak

Must be a new way to scam more more more dollars from the gummint.


78 posted on 01/11/2011 10:34:15 AM PST by Carley (PRINTING OPINION, IGNORING THE FACTS......the msm!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: N3WBI3

You FORGET about incremental steps with Liberals making laws.No Gun Zones around schools were struck down.


79 posted on 01/11/2011 10:34:16 AM PST by Renegade
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: Redcloak

So, next time some loonytoon goes after a lawmaker there won’t be anyone carrying to save anyone.


80 posted on 01/11/2011 10:34:53 AM PST by bgill (K Parliament- how could a young man born in Kenya who is not even a native American become the POTUS)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100 ... 141-157 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson