Posted on 12/30/2010 6:31:05 PM PST by Jeff Head
On Sean Hannity's special program on Thursday, December 30th, 2010, he had Sarah Palin on as the guest. He asked her if she was considering running for the Presidency in 2012, and she said she was. That she is making it matter of serious prayer and consideration. that her husband, Todd, would support her, and that she felt the children would. She said if the country needed her, she would offer herself up to public service and we would wait to see who else entered the race. I read it as she was going to be running and that the primaries will sort out who the ultimate candidate would be.
All I can ay to this, if I am correct, is, thank God.
I believe Sarah Palin has the potential of leading a turn around in this nation as big, if not bigger than what Reagan accomplished after Jimmy Carter when he was elected in 1982.
Why? Because the American people are already demanding such a turn around. The Tea party Movement in America exerted that influence in the 2010 elections. I believe in 2012 i will be even stronger and that Sarah would win, and win gig, and that she would have a supportinve majority in both the House and Senate.
I pray to God it is so.
As to her campaign in 2012 for the Presidency of the United States against Barrack Obama, should she win the primaries, I believe the following two pictures sum it up best why she will route the marxist and send them packing out of our nation's capital in 2012.
She, her family, their faith, their values, and their story (particularly of choosing life for their young son and then so obviously being blessed with love for that son and he for them) represent the absolute refutation of all the tired old liberal mantras and victimology and a culture of death that they malignantly use to mentally, psychologically, and financially enslave whole classes of people.
From women's rights, to family values, to gun rights, to abortion, to energy policy, to taxation, to envrionmentalism, to fundamental governing principal, to U.S. soveriegnty and independence, and on and on...Sarah Palin is a wrecking ball to the leftist, liberal, socialist house of cards.
I believe federal funding of abortion was stopped under Bush during his first term...but then signed back in under Obama.
Fact is, the left, the RINOS the establishment elites, the libs, DNC, etc., etc. are very scared of Sarah.
I believe she will be the 1st woman Presideent and she will have my support.
That’s right. As far as I can tell, abortion is a state matter, like it or not.
I used to think that the 5th or 9th Amendment covered protection of innocent human life, but I now interpret those amendments to mean that the Federal and, through the 14th Amendment, the state governments cannot perform or fund abortions. Therefore, planned parenthood is unconstitutional.
Furthermore, under Article I, Section 8 and the 10th Amendment, only state governments can outlaw abortion. If this country were sane enough to pass and ratify a Human Life Amendment, that could change, though.
Outstanding post. Amen!
What other unalienable rights besides the right to live do you feel this way about?
RUN, SARAH, RUN!!
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2649639/posts
There's some of that going on as well.
You didn’t understand my post, I guess I wasn’t clear enough. Sarah Palin is pro-life. She answers the first question they put to her so stating. But you know what happens after that, the media starts throwing every pregnancy situation at her thereby demanding she answer it again, which is the only thing that makes the news cycle. To allow them to control the debate works against the candidate.
She has made her position clear on illegal aliens and I believe her positions as stated in O'Reilley's interview would have most illegals self-deport which would be a great thing and an outstanding first step to getting the others left here to leave.
She's clearly for protecting the borders and getting the fence complete and manned with the Guard if necessary.
A lot of people want to talk like her giving some a chance to stay longer as some kind of amnesty, but I do not believe it is...I believe it is just a way to get them identified and giving them and our own people the time to organize the best way to get them out of the country.
But we shall see. A big year coming up and we will see near the end who all is lining up to run.
As I said above...she is not perfect...but she shall have my support if she runs and short of something very tangential or opposite of this coming out.
I have a different take. The right to life is guaranteed in our founding documents. No one has the right to deny life, either the federal, state or local government, nor any individual.
The Tenth Amendment talks about the powers that are reserved to the states and to the people.
There is no rightful, lawful, constitutional power to alienate unalienable God-given rights, by definition. For any individual or governmental entity.
This Stephen A. Douglas Democrat, Gerald R. Ford, Ron Paul, John McCain, Sarah Palin Republican “states’ rights trumps unalienable rights” position is destructive of this free republic’s most important foundational principles.
And the Tea Party will get stronger every minute its happening.
You’re wrong. She’s pro-choice for states, just exactly like Gerald R. Ford, Ron Paul, and John McCain.
Which is the exact moral equivalent of the Stephen A. Douglas position on slavery in the 1850s.
Well said.
Pres. GW Bush tried to do a great thing by taking on Social Security at the beginning of his second term. His party in congress let him down big time but so did we, the American people. If we had a tea party movement back them, we could have done a great service to our country in getting his reforms through the congress. We can’t continue to have these missed opportunities.
Juan gets his daily Obama defense talking points from David & Valerie. While he is loyal to Fox, know that he has access to Axelrod and will always defend Obama.
my wife uses birth control. we can’t afford 12 kids. I am a christian and pro-life. I don’t understand where you are coming from.Here is a video in that regard: How "The Pill" works as an Abortifacient.
Let me ask you, and the others here who are following the Palin line, a couple of questions:
If a candidate said that states could outlaw the keeping and bearing of arms would you call them “pro-gun”?
If a candidate said that states, if they saw fit, could outlaw free speech, and freedom of the press, and the right of peaceful assembly, and the right to worship God according to the dictates of their conscience, and the right to petition government for the redress of grievances, and the right to a fair trial before a jury of their peers, would you call them “pro-liberty”?
Why is the supreme right, the right to life, different?
I agree with this.
But she has also said that she is flat out against abortion and that it is wrong and that Roe v Wade should be overturned and abortion outlawed. She has a very high mark on her anti-abortion stance.
The federal government through the congress could get into the act with a constitutional amendment...so could the states. I hope and pray that happens.
Short of that, let's get Roe v Wade overturned. Then we shall see most states immediately outlaw it and then we can work from there on the amendment to force the others. I believe that is a very doable and winning strategy. I do not believe we are going to erase it in a day...though I wish to God we could.
I have made my own position very clear on it. Abortion is one issue I could fight over if it came down to that.
The Abortion Holocaust (Warning graphic)
I believe that is almost exactly what Palin is looking to have happen.
We have a long hill to climb on several fronts.
There is already a specific constitutional amendment on the right to own firearms.
Sadly, apparently we must have one on life too.
But perhpas not of we go about this correctly. 1st, let's get the right justices to overturn Roe v Wade...which should have happened decades ago.
I wish we had a President who would absolutley not enforce it at all on constitutional grounds. I know that is what I would do. But I'm not running and would be probably, short of the powerful hand of God himself supporting someone like that, be un-electable.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.