Posted on 12/27/2010 4:48:36 PM PST by i88schwartz
On Monday night's edition of "Hardball," host Chris Matthews talked about putting the birth certificate controversy surrounding President Obama to rest.
"Why has the president himself not demanded they put out the original documents?" Matthews wonders.
"If it exists, why not put it out?" Chris Matthews asks.
(Excerpt) Read more at realclearpolitics.com ...
[He isn’t who he says he is]
I believe that Phil.
.
Brennan is a creepy little incompetent slimeball
But then DC is chock full of them now
“London? What happened in London?”
.
Like General Johnson of The Chairmen Of The Board
That is a weird first name isn't it, Jedidah?
Lol, both here at the same time. I was checking out the wild thread.......
You have the other side of Obama’s eligibility i.e. his admitted father was a Kenyan subject to British rule. As such Obama is not eligible because one parent was not of USA soil or even a USA citizen. The birth record is very important but not necessarily crucial. Arguments over the birth document serve to obfuscate what should have been taken care of long ago by the courts and congress. Not only will Obama’s party time go down in history as more infamous than Pearl Harbor but the people who enabled this to happen ,congress persons and court persons, will in Roosevelt’s words be forever remembered.
You betcha!!
You have the other side of Obama’s eligibility i.e. his admitted father was a Kenyan subject to British rule. As such Obama is not eligible because one parent was not of USA soil or even a USA citizen. The birth record is very important but not necessarily crucial. Arguments over the birth document serve to obfuscate what should have been taken care of long ago by the courts and congress. Not only will Obama’s party time go down in history as more infamous than Pearl Harbor but the people who enabled this to happen ,congress persons and court persons, will in Roosevelt’s words be forever remembered.
You have the other side of Obama’s eligibility i.e. his admitted father was a Kenyan subject to British rule. As such Obama is not eligible because one parent was not of USA soil or even a USA citizen. The birth record is very important but not necessarily crucial. Arguments over the birth document serve to obfuscate what should have been taken care of long ago by the courts and congress. Not only will Obama’s party time go down in history as more infamous than Pearl Harbor but the people who enabled this to happen ,congress persons and court persons, will in Roosevelt’s words be forever remembered.
.
.....wild is the thread
.
Is there a source link for this claim?
Is there a source link for this claim?
Careful there, Chrissy, or that tingle up your leg will be replaced by the excruciating pain of a crushed kneecap.
Pedophile prez.
OMG that’s funny. LOL
Obama is a girl, he was really born a girl... I knew it. No wonder he needs to hide his B/C. LMAO
Let's just avoid saying that he has spent ANY moment with his BC on his forehead or anywhere else.
I think you are right. My question is, who on the democrap side is going to sign that form that he’s “constitutionally eligible” to be POTUS? That’s the form that Pelousy signed twice, in Denver during the 2008 convention, one with the word constitutionally and one without the word constitutionally? Certainly they can’t use the old fraudulous versions from 2008 again?
It all depends on what the word ‘is’ is. One form has one definition and the other form has the other definition.
Obama ‘is’ constitionally ‘eligible’ to be President?
Just ask Chris Matthews.
What can be done against such blatant cheating and corruption? The American public don't care enough about the birth certificate issue or are too ashamed to go down that path. It's just becoming another weapon to use against those who wish to keep America free.
And really, what's the difference between the Clintons and Obama? The former were born here but like the latter they are Marxist sociopaths who hate America.
I don't like it because it's a slap in the face of the Founders and the Constitution. But, that the President should be a natural born citizen obviously doesn't guarantee loyalty. In the end, no matter what type of Leftist is in the White House, we have to assume that he or she means to totally reverse the individual rights guaranteed by the Constitution in order to obtain complete control.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.