Posted on 12/18/2010 11:33:01 AM PST by Jim Robinson
A couple more posters got zotted today.
Guess we need another reminder:
If you support the homosexual agenda you are anti-constitution and you'll get the zot from FR. Homosexuals already have the same "rights" as everyone else. God did not grant and the constitution does not guarantee homosexuals any special rights. In fact, the homosexual agenda is a full frontal attack on OUR God-given, constitutionally protected rights to free speech, freedom of religion, freedom of association, Life, Family, Marriage, Pursuit of Happiness, etc.
I don't want it on FR and won't have it on FR.
Like abortion, if you support the homosexual agenda on FR, your account here will be zotted!
Don't like it? Tough frickin Shinola! Get the hell OFF this conservative site!!
I don't know. Maybe off listening to the Republican astro-turfers who have been telling them it's all about money issues.
It’s a learning experience. Learn! Then act and then learn more. Repeat.
Others interpret DADT as the original slippery slope that led to our current situation. So if you are fighting for DADT, haven’t your principles already been compromised? You are fighting for gays to serve in the military?
>> Homosexuality is immoral and objectionable.
That’s not in question.
My point concerns MozartLover’s emotional investment in FR, and how it was disrupted by merely opinion on the subject of open homosexuality in the Military.
While MozartLover can quietly disappear away from that which she finds objectionable, those in the Military cannot do so easily.
I've had the same thought myself, a time or two.
Sometimes right after I hit "Post" for a snarky post aimed at you!
If I get the zot first, be kind :-)
Absolutely agree.
On a side note:
After throwing three Supreme Court judges out here in Iowa on Nov. 2nd for exceeding their jurisdiction and legislating from the bench in the case of homosexual fake marriage, we’re fighting to impeach their remaining four colleagues.
It’s a completely grassroots effort to get our legislators to see the light and do the right thing by their oaths of office.
We have the people on our side. They have already rendered their verdict in this matter.
But I come here to FR to drum up support for this very important grassroots activism and I’m accosted constantly by Republicans on the threads about this arguing against impeachment, or at best, for defeatism.
So, I’m saying all that, on this particular thread, to point up the fact that our problem is much deeper than just those who openly are supporting the gay agenda.
The real problem is those who say they’re on our side but are unprincipled and constantly undermine us.
The hard left is a small minority in this country. They wouldn’t have any political power whatsoever without the compromised Republicans.
Who will represent us and America’s founding principles?
Thankfully, here in Iowa we’ve got at least a couple of new legislators who are.
Have we snarked at one another?
If I get the zot first, be kind :-)
I don't have parties over zots. I may sigh in relief but I usually don't party. Well, unless it's a repeat troll like zort/troz.
Absolutely!
To put it another way, the problem isn't with the Romans, but with the Judas Iscariots.
This thread is very revealing. I'm still somewhat of a newbie, but I'm stunned at all the cowardly FReepers that have come out of the woodwork on this thread. These cowards cringe and tremble at the thought of being called "homophobic," yet I'm sure they must understand that to take a pass at this battle against homosexualism in the military means that the last institution in America that honors Judeo-Christian values is lost.
I have to agree with some of the people who have been zotted on this thread, but for the opposite reason. This thread is indeed sad, but only because so few Americans (apparently) are willing to vocally defend Christian values and our Christian heritage on a public forum.
I thank God for everyone on this thread who is bold enough to defend America's Christian heritage on this thread.
I've got your back!
Barney Frank: Not Allowing Gays and Straights to Shower Together is ‘Discrimination’
I smell ozone..
Yeah, whatever the (perceived) majority thinks, that’s the truth! Or maybe just who shouts the loudest, or who grabs the megaphone.
Very well said. IOW, it's not the enemy who wears the enemy country's uniform, it's the guy wearing the same uniform you're wearing who sympathizes with the guys on the other side and never fights hard, and secretly assists the enemy. They're much worse. They're called "traitors".
I'm not interested whether homosexuals are born, made, recruited or choose to be homosexuals, the fact remains that modern day homosexuals have chosen to vociferously define themselves by their sexual behavior not their "alternative lifestyle", and they're demanding special rights to accommodate their deviant behavior.
Given that polygamists were not allowed to redefine marriage to suit themselves, why should homosexuals be allowed to? You know that with the repeal of DADT, that homosexual marriage is the next item on the agenda. The Marxist addressed it today, although he called it 'gay marriage' and I refuse to use their verbiage. Words are supposed to have meaning, so let's use a word that has meaning: homosexual, NOT gay.
You never surprise me. After the bloodletting, nail’s head meet hammer.
You are one tough broad...
I should add, “and still remain dainty” ;o)
If you ever need some flycatcher backing, just give me a pingaling!
LOL. Many thanks for the sweet addition. *(((HUG)))*
Buahahahahahahahahahaha!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.