If you support the homosexual agenda you are anti-Constitution and you'll get the zot from FR!

Jim Robinson

[Jim Robinson]

A couple more posters got zotted today.

Guess we need another reminder:

If you support the homosexual agenda you are anti-constitution and you'll get the zot from FR. Homosexuals already have the same "rights" as everyone else. God did not grant and the constitution does not guarantee homosexuals any special rights. In fact, the homosexual agenda is a full frontal attack on OUR God-given, constitutionally protected rights to free speech, freedom of religion, freedom of association, Life, Family, Marriage, Pursuit of Happiness, etc.

I don't want it on FR and won't have it on FR.

Like abortion, if you support the homosexual agenda on FR, your account here will be zotted!

Don't like it? Tough frickin Shinola! Get the hell OFF this conservative site!!

[BigSkyFreeper]

If you truly believe that then you're an idiot. I don't like the way DADT has been repealed but I spent most of my adult life in the military and I think I know a thing or two about it. You gloom and doomers who say this will destroy the military are giving little credit to the hundreds of thousands of men and women in uniform who will not let it. The true professionals in uniform will remain true professionals.

This gloom and doomer hopes that enlistments go through the roof because that was one of the straw men arguments used by the deviant sexual perverts to push the bill to where it's at now.

Supporting DADT is like supporting the militant gay agenda.  I cannot as a God-fearing Christian support something that God describes as evil and an abomination.

It's posters like you that are the reason why the left is slowly making inroads in the destruction of the moral fabric of this nation.

You may not think it affects the military or the country as a whole, I say you are misguided by the notion that the left engages in tactics of making people like youself comfortable with things like DADT.  It's the frog in the pot scenario. 

First they get DADT passed and Lord only knows where they're headed next, but what I do know is they're taking you and me along for the ride over the cliff.

[DJ MacWoW]

Oh and see Jim's post 2131.

[Las Vegas Ron]

Have you ever had mint tea?

Just take some leaves and boil them for a bit, then strain....good stuff.

[DJ MacWoW]

No. I haven’t. I’ll have to try that.

[Clint N. Suhks]

Check out the keywords, looks like it was the piggy.

[DJ MacWoW]

It probably was. When keywords are added they know who did it. They can remove them too.

[Jim Robinson]

zot

[Clint N. Suhks]

I’ve asked the Mods to post who keyword trolls were on threads before and they kindly obliged. . .

[DJ MacWoW]

I have never asked. I’ve only requested that they get rid of inappropriate ones and they always do.

[Jim Robinson]

Wasn’t a FReeper. It’s the calling card of the RubberPiggy aka Danny H “the conservative who deserves respect.” RubberPiggy is just head fake. He really wishes he were a rubber gerbil.

[wagglebee]

You are an embarrassment to this site and should be be ashamed of yourself.

Hey, I've got an idea, maybe you can start a "Wankers for Sodomy" forum like you did when you were pushing Rudy a few years back.

I'm not really sure where the anti-FReepers congregate these days, but I'm sure they are terrified that threads like this are going to jeopardize the "big tent" they spend so much time fantasizing about.

[Las Vegas Ron]

Funny, a lot of people haven’t.

When I was kid growing up in So Cal, it seemed like mint grew everywhere.

Mom was alway sending me out to pick some for tea with dinner.

[DCPatriot]

Nice try wagglebee.....get lost.

[presently no screen name]

Homosexuals DO have the same rights as everyone else. What they WANT are “special rights”.

My point is the 'group' thing - rights are individual - all equal under the law. It's another affirmative action -lawless law. A 'group' is now more protected, offered more rights than individual rights afford.

I believe that is what Stourme is trying to point out.

Thanks. You are better at mind reading than I am. ;) Special rights, group rights, muzzie rights - it's all the same, IMO.

[Jim Robinson]

zot

[wagglebee]

I'm curious, which part are you denying?

Is it that "WAnkers for Rudy" was a RINO anti-FReeper site? Or that you were a member?

[melancholy]

From the name, I guess it’s not only a faggot, but also one that can’t handle a human being because of non-existent sexual capability.

He resorts to rubber objects, all by his lonesome!

[re_nortex]

Thank you so much for this early Christmas present!

My "born on" date is obviously recent but I was in read-only mode here for a long time (just after 9/11/01). In fact it was the venom in the disruptive postings by N-S over the years that were among the reasons that I deferred joining.

In my opinion, FR is becoming a better, more friendly place for we Patriotic Constitutional Conservatives.

[DJ MacWoW]

I have spearmint and lemon balm growing in the yard planted by some past farm wife but no mint.

[Clint N. Suhks]

Holy Crap, Jim zotted Non-Sequitur, he used to show up the sodomy threads long ago back when I was really active fighting the Homo-Agenda.

I’m surprised he lasted here this long.