Posted on 12/05/2010 8:34:12 AM PST by FS11
September 2008: Republican vice-presidential candidate Sarah Palins Yahoo email account is compromised by a member of Anonymous, an online group of hackers, in the final months of the presidential campaign. Personal emails are posted to WikiLeaks, and questions are raised about whether Palin used the personal account to flout public records laws.
April 2010: A video of a U.S. Apache helicopter killing Iraqi civilians and two Reuters journalists is posted to WikiLeaks. While the U.S. had never denied that the civilians and journalists were killed, the graphic footage of the horrors of war quickly goes viral online.
July 2010: WikiLeaks publishes 92,000 pages of U.S. military memos termed the Afghan War Diaries. Among the dumps contents are reports confirming that members of Pakistans intelligence agency routinely met with Taliban fighters between 2004 and 2009, as well as field notes on mounting civilian casualties throughout Afghanistan.
October 2010: Some 400,000 pages on the Iraq War that the Pentagon called the largest leak of classified documents in its history are posted by WikiLeaks. The groups de facto spokesman, Julian Assange, says the documents show 15,000 civilian deaths previously unreported, as well as numerous instances of abuse of civilians at the hands of Iraqi security forces.
Nov. 28, 2010: Through several mainstream media partners, WikiLeaks releases confidential U.S. diplomatic cables, frank assessment of various American allies, with some incriminating information about U.S. foreign activities. WikiLeaks says the information, to be followed by further releases later in the week, will contain seven times as many documents as October release.
(Excerpt) Read more at news.nationalpost.com ...
Theres more to that also, that I just thought of. Wikileaks, through somebody with the name jeena paradies (who is friendly with the Soros types, according to what I was able to find on him), published Obamas so-called Advertiser birth announcement, claiming that it was the first time they had been published even though images had been online for some time. But it was the first time that the document was in searchable pdf format rather than as a graphic image.
Those announcements were forged. The microfilms were documentably changed out at least once in 3 libraries and at least twice in another.
The Advertiser was working to convert their archives into searchable pdf files.
Wikileaks has since removed their announcement image from the web - before any of these large leaks so it wasnt because they didnt have space to keep it on.
The evidence we have at this point strongly suggests that somebody at The Advertiser perpetrated both the Advertiser and the Star-Bulletin forgeries. The Advertiser had the archived microfilms of both papers at their office and would have been able to make the pristine copies from the silver nitrate first-generation master microfilm.
They also had microfiche - which together with the microfilm was available for the public to use. I cant find out when that was no longer the case but the first time theres any written account of it was when infidel granny on the Atlas Shrugs blog said she asked to see the microfilms and was told they are not public. The microfiche sheets would have had some wear and tear, with which to make the copies that now show up in the Hawaii State Library that are very heavily scratched with DIAGONAL scratches in bizarre places like the shipping charts, which would not have gotten that way from microfilm readers. The Hawaii State Librarian says their microfilm was NOT made from microfiche sheets, but the diagonal scratches on microfilm would only come from somebody trying to take a diagonal copy of the page. Why would tons of people be trying to take a diagonal copy of the shipping charts - the most heavily used page on the whole microfilm, if the scratches are genuine?
It would not surprise me one bit if Obama had The Advertiser and Wikileaks work together to try to give legitimacy to what somebody at The Advertiser had forged for Obama.
So there IS something that Wikileaks leaked in regards to Obamas eligibility: the forged Advertiser announcement, in a format intended to provide legitimacy, as if it came from the Advertisers digitized archives.
Glenn Beck talked about the Wikileaks connection to a number of Soros groups. Considering that nothing was leaked that is damaging to Obama but only furthering his ends - including an attempt to legitimize a forgery regarding Obamas eligibility - I would say it looks pretty likely that Obama IS behind the Wikileaks.
Either that or Wikileaks has voluntarily supported only very critically-timed BHO causes such as damaging Palin, damaging Odingas rival, supporting Obamas fake eligibility story, damaging the war efforts, and damaging Hillary when questions were being asked whether she would run against Obama in 2012.
37 posted on Monday, December 06, 2010 11:04:12 AM by butterdezillion
Thanks for the info.
The Kenyans know the score:
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/2637497/posts?page=9
..interesting aside on this story.
ping to butter’s #25
Thanks for the info about the inclusion of the bogus birth announcements, butter. Very interesting and very supportive, imo, of the notion that our dear leader is indeed the Wikileaks deepthroat.
make that #37, not #25
What language is it in?"
Does he (assange) host on his own equipment?
Think about this: Hussein, and his cabal, are privy to every single secret in the US government. Every secret program. Every spy network. Every defense secret. Now you can get worried and agitated.”
I was beating this drum back in 2008. The wikileaks is just the beginning, imho.
Sounds like meat is back on the menu.
Odinga did not win. His muslim party took less than a third of the vote. After Odinga’s muslim supporters spent a few weeks hacking up several thousand non-muslim opponents with machettes, the winning party “created” a special prime minister position for Odinga, just to stop the bloodshed.
poor wording on my part I caught after the fact.. he did manipulate his way into a new ‘prime minister’ role created for him due to the bloodshed, violence, and document leaks after. He didn’t win that one but he ended up getting a position of almost equal power because of interference.
“Assanges emails through the years, especially on hacker usenet groups shows a deep dislike for the United States and a desire to destroy this country: http://cryptome.org/0001/assange-cpunks.htm"
Page is too big for most people to parse. If you have parsed it, some choice quotes would be helpful in your post!
That's OK. We got the evil cousin. Hard to tell what his final tally will be.
You’re welcome. I’ll be really glad when I’m finally able to post the evidence to support what I’ve said.
I’m torn between priorities right now. The Lakin court-martial and passing state eligibility laws are high priorities. The announcement forgeries being exposed would blow away the arguments of people like Bill O’Reilly and even the Obama counsel’s request for judicial notice of those announcements. But there doesn’t yet seem to be a route for the fact of either the COLB or announcement forgeries to make any legal difference.
It doesn’t hurt for people to know about it though, and the connection to Wikileaks is interesting. I’d have to check to be sure, but I think the Politifact update about Obama’s COLB might have linked to the Wikileaks page. All the original postings of the announcements have been removed from the web except for the whatreallyhappened.com site, which still has the images but not the article claiming the images are from the library microfilms. The media keeps talking about those announcement images but it’s interesting that the original postings of them are all gone now except the WRH site. When you go to the news articles almost all the links to the announcements are dead links.
I too am angry about the persecution of Col Lakin. I am disturbed by his lawyer stating that he had no defense 11 days before trial. Hopefully, he will fire that lawyer and get a good lawyer for his appeal who will file a motion for Original Jurisdiction with SCOTUS.
This is what makes BO’s WikiLeaks so crucial to his legal removal, because SCOTUS can take a case involving Ambassadors directly without the delays of original action in Federal District Court and appeal to the Court of Appeals.
http://thesteadydrip.blogspot.com/2010/07/taking-aka-obama-directly-before-scotus.html
I’m on the way out the door, but there’s a thread about Puckett changing his mind, at http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-bloggers/2638338/posts . I’m not able to see Youtube so I don’t know what it all is. What do you make of it?
I would imagine Soros is paying the bills.
seriously doubt it.
He was utilizing the amazon overflow cloud until recently.
Right now he is running on hosted bandwidth with Bahnhof Internet, Sweden and OVH or something like that in France
He attended a Catholic school, and attended a ‘public’ (Muslim) school). I forget in which order, but half of his time was spent at first one, then he was transferred to the other.
And, no; the Muslim school was a grammar school, not a madrassa...but he was registered as a Muslim.
The joys of having a multi-culty commie mommy!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.