Posted on 11/23/2010 3:35:48 PM PST by Retired Intelligence Officer
Radio host Rush Limbaugh is again calling into question the constitutional eligibility of Barack Obama to serve as president, declaring him to be a phony.
"We have an impostor for all intents and purposes serving in the White House," Limbaugh said today.
The comment from the top-rated host came during his analysis of the disclosure that Mullah Akhtar Mohammad Mansour, a purported representative of the Taliban negotiating with the Afghan government, actually turned out to be an impersonator.
Limbaugh said: "The impostor got into the equivalent of the White House in Afghanistan. Did they not ask this guy for some kind of identification? They clearly didn't. They clearly didn't ask this guy for his birth certificate. How in the world could they trust in a leader and even give money to somebody who has not been properly vetted? Well, because it happened here in the United States. We have an impostor for all intents and purposes serving in the White House."
(Excerpt) Read more at wnd.com ...
I hope I’m remembering the discussion right and somebody hasn’t already pointed this out, but Doug Hagmann says he’s got witness statements, hand-written notes, etc showing that the top executives of news media and talk radio companies were threatened with annihilation if they reported on very specific aspects of the eligibility issue.
I’ve compiled my own timeline of events that I believe may be related to that and though I’m not confident enough to do a full post on it yet, I believe that threat occurred shortly after Oct 15, 2008.
One of the things I’ve looked at is the behavior of Fox executives. Hannity did an expose of Obama’s past on Oct 5, with Andy Martin as the guest, and by Oct 26th (IIRC) Fox executives were loudly apologizing for having such a PC-incorrect guest, although Hannity himself never agreed with the executives’ apologies. Andy Martin has also sued Hawaii to see Obama’s BC, so there is a connection to that issue. Note that the Fox execs were not apoogizing for the content of the expose but only for allowing Martin to be a guest. They claimed to have qualms about anti-Jew comments Martin had made in the past. But I don’t think Fox execs have apologized for having CAIR people on, and we know what they’re up to...
We also know that Fox execs told their on-air personalities to give Obama a pass after the election.
There are just a bunch of things that I’ve been able to observe that seem to corroborate what Hagmann is saying.
The timeline itself is striking - the timing connections between the ratings for McCain after choosing Palin as running-mate, the electronic run on the bank, Berg’s lawsuit filings and the actions of the judge in that case, actions of Fox executives, Glenn Beck’s move to Fox, Chief Justice Robert’s unprecedented invitation for Obama to meet with SCOTUS (the invitation given on the exact same day that SCOTUS first faced and dismissed an eligibility suit, but knowing that others were around the corner), the date Hagmann says he received the statement of a talk show host about the threats, Fukino’s first announcement, etc
I know this is sort of a tease because I’m not ready to post that timeline yet; have a few things to iron out first. But when a person gets looking at the circumstantial evidence, some things that I’m not ready to be publicly associated with yet actually look much more credible than they did at the time.
There is no question that my content has been censored from various “news” websites, that Hannity’s web page allowed only one thread on the eligibility issue, and that callers to talk shows were screened out if they wanted to talk about the eligibility issue. So at the very least there was a silencing of the issue. But I believe Hagmann’s claims are very, very credible also.
I think Soros ordered the run on the bank when he realized that Sarah Palin could be a game-changer. Then when Berg’s suit was being taken seriously he decided to make whatever threats he had to in order to get his puppet in place. Having already shown his financial muscle he could use it to silence strategic people.
The question has been raised regarding Hillary. She is the person who would undoubtedly have had standing to threaten Obama’s coup. She is beholden to Soros so he may not have had to threaten her, but the SOS position could have been Soros’ idea, to silence her. It is Hillary’s State Department that is having troubles “finding” simple alphabetized passport records for Obama’s mother for over a year now. The guy who oversaw the investigation of the 3-time breach of Obama’s passport is now the Vice President, and the guy whose company disabled the security protocols 3 separate times to allow those breaches is now the National Security Director.
I should check out the timing of the announcement that Hillary would be SOS. And the timing of the Fox executives’ attack on Martin relative to when he went to Hawaii for his lawsuit (and Obama’s sudden trip to HI around then too - followed shortly afterwards by Fukino’s statement...)
Anyway, stuff to think about.
AFganistatn tends to raise my blood pressure though. lol
Yes, indeed, much food for thought. (After the Thanksgiving Feast.)
I don’t get to listen to Rush often, but I remember a couple times where he referred to very secret meetings he was attending. Does anybody know when those were and if Rush ever then revealed what they were about?
Same to you!!
Isn't that a spatula?
Interesting stuff to be sure.
I appreciate your posting it without the usual birther vitriol and namecalling.
That alone caused me to read it carefully and to think about it.
I think Beck knows Soros is the one who has enabled an ineligible fraud to invade the White House. I think he’s trying to attack the source of the problem, and to be honest I don’t think we’re going to get any court to give us real justice on this until the power of Soros to destroy our economy is diminished.
I’m trying to sort out whether the public knowing what Soros and Obama have done would in any way impact their ability to hold our judicial system hostage by threats of financial system retaliation.
I have little doubts, with Pelosi hanging on and all the crap being pushed during the lame-duck period, that the dems are feeling cornered and their reasons to uphold the pretenses are wearing thin. Any chance that the Blue Dogs who weren’t up for reelection this round might bolt on Soros to get America back from the economic precipice that gives Soros his power?
It’s been a long last couple days because of work and personal stuff, as well as being sick, so if somebody could help me sort that through I’d be very thankful.
My heart skipped a beat on that one. I had forgotten that.
Three guess n00bie.
American Constitutionalist
Since Aug 20, 2009
Finally something that we can agree upon!
The issue has been useful to show us just how far we’ve gotten from the rule of law. Sort of like how the Holocaust is useful to us at this point: it shows us that the unthinkable is possible, so we can try to close the vulnerabilities and see it never happen again.
Obama himself is irrelevant. It took a lot of crooked law-breaking to get him where he is now, where he has done crooked law-breaking ever since.
We can’t put Congress-critters like Pelosi in jail for trampling the Constitution since there’s no criminal statute about that. But we can put them in jail for committing perjury - which is one of the things Pelosi did to trample the Constitution. This issue, in the end, provides the bridge between the theoretical Constitution and the jail cell, which is the only form of accountability language these people comprehend or speak.
It’s an incredibly useful issue, as Pelosi et al are about to learn. Lord willing.
Oops. I guess I didn’t remember the discussion right. Apparently somebody said YOU wanted to suppress the issue.
So ignore my long post (as you probably did already anyway. lol)
THIS after I told you I appreciated it?
When did Barack Hussein Obama’s dad become a US citizen?
Fact: Never, he died a Kenyan in Kenya.
I have a funny feeling you and humblegunner take turns lubing Pablo’s wily lower horn.
Everybody remember a day or so before the ‘08 stealection Pelosi sat Her Thighness and Zero down for a meeting at her house, and we all speculated it was over the BC?
Probably was. Pelosi said: OK, I’m giving the Presidency to you, Zero. Screw it up and in ‘12 I give it to Queenie here.
There are threads on it.
Point out where Eaker said he did.
You can't, because he didn't.
You have some kind of mental illness or fixation. You see things that aren't there.
What hold over the SCOTUS do you refer to?
BTW your comments are among the very best on FR about this. The Very, Very best because you tie things together and show clearly how it is the rule of law that is falling, and it is not just one man who is the enemy, as though 0bastard is gotten rid of not re-elected, or resigns, or even is removed, and All is Well with the World.
It is much deeper than that.
Thank you for your work. I wish I could help you but I’m pathetically disorganized and practically feeble minded.
Cite a single where I said he did. You have more than a decade of history to look though so it might take a while so maybe you ought to shut up and get started.
If you have funny feelings about Pablo that is between you and your parents not me. I guess it was probably tough on you having a mother who didn't love you enough and a father who loved you too often.
I hadn’t gotten to your post saying you appreciated it yet. It’s taken me a while to slog through this thread.
But I’m glad you read it and consider what it says, especially since it must have been a bolt out of the blue because it had nothing to do with the conversation you had been having. You must have thought I was nuts. lol
Reminds me of the skit of people riding a bus:
Traveler 1: My, it’s windy out.
Traveler 2: Today’s not Wednesday, it’s Thursday.
Traveler 3: I’m thirsty too. Let’s get off the bus and have a cup of tea!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.