Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

TSA-Sexual Assault (read what the "mommy blogger" had to endure)
Our Little Chatterboxes Blog ^ | 11/16/10 | Erin

Posted on 11/18/2010 8:45:47 AM PST by skyman

TSA - Sexual Assault

I have an incident to share that occurred late Friday afternoon, November 12, 2010, around 5:15 in the Dayton International Airport.

I realize the publishing this publically on the internet puts me into a delicate situation, given that I am a high profile blogger and author. This is a difficult incident to share, but it needs to be said...Because I will not be a silent victim. I will share the facts of the incident in as a matter of fact manner as I can.

I checked into my flight and had a boarding pass printed that included “plus infant.” My baby and I were flying from Dayton, OH, to San Antonio, TX, so I could run in the San Antonio Half Marathon. I was taking my baby along because he is still breastfeeding for part of the day.

I entered the security line, removed the special formula that I had with me for the baby, as well as my quart size baggie with my other liquids. I went through the x-ray machine and metal detector, carrying the baby, with no incident.

Because I was traveling with baby formula, I knew to expect that they would test it with the paper circles for explosives. The TSA agent took all of my belongings over to the table in the center of the explosive screening tables. She asked me, “Are you aware of the NEW policies for carrying liquids through security that were instated 4 years ago?” (capitalized to show the emphasis that she placed on that word.)

I replied, “Yes, I fly with him every several weeks.”

She scanned the formula, then turned to me and said, “Remove your shoes and stand on that black mat for a patdown.”

I said, “OK, what do I do with the baby?”

“You cannot be holding him.” (I am traveling alone.)

So I placed him into his stroller. She instructed me, “Spread your feet apart and hold your arms out to the side.” I obliged.

She patted my left arm, my right arm, my upper back and my lower back. She then said, “I need to reach in and feel along the inside of your waistband.”

She felt along my waistline, moved behind me, then proceeded to feel both of my buttocks. She reached from behind in the middle of my buttocks towards my vagina area.

She did not tell me that she was going to touch my buttocks, or reach forward to my vagina area.

She then moved in front of my and touched the top and underneath portions of both of my breasts.

She did not tell me that she was going to touch my breasts.

She then felt around my waist. She then moved to the bottoms of my legs.

She then felt my inner thighs and my vagina area, touching both of my labia.

She did not tell me that she was going to touch my vagina area or my labia.

She then told me that I could put my shoes on and I asked if I could pick up the baby, she replied Yes.

She then moved back to my belongings to finish scanning them with the paper discs for explosives. When she finished she said I was free to go.

I stood there holding my baby in shock. I did not move for almost a minute.

I stood there, an American citizen, a mom traveling with a baby with special needs formula, sexually assaulted by a government official. I began shaking and felt completely violated, abused and assaulted by the TSA agent. I shook for several hours, and woke up the next day shaking.

Here is why I was sexually assaulted. She never told me the new body search policy. She never told me that she was going to touch my private parts. She never told me when or where she was going to touch me. She did not inform me that a private screening was available. She did not inform me of my rights that were a part of these new enhanced patdown procedures.

When I booked my ticket, I was given no information that the TSA had changed their wand and unintrusive patdown procedures to “enhanced” patdown procedures that involved the touching of all parts of your body, including breasts and vagina on women and testicles and penis on men. I was not informed by any signs on the front side of security about the new procedures. I had not seen any media coverage about the issue, so I had no idea that this was a new government sanctioned policy.

Another important piece in this story, the Dayton airport does not have the new body scanners. I was not given any other search options. It was enhanced patdown, or nothing. (And I would have opted for the body scanner, if I were going to be subject to a sexual assault.)

I asked to speak to a supervisor immediately. I had a very unpleasant conversation with him that lasted 20 minutes. I moved to the back of the security area, made a few phone calls, including to my lawyer. He did some quick research, and learned that I had indeed been sexually assaulted because she did not follow the SOP (standard operating procedure) for the new search.

During our first conversation, the TSA acting manager of the shift told me that the TSA agent who sexually assaulted me was supposed to inform me about the new search procedure and tell me when and where she was going to touch me. He also apologized on behalf of himself and on behalf of the agent who sexually assaulted me. I was not allowed to speak to the agent who sexually assaulted me, nor did the acting manager provide me with her name. (I did not have the presence of mind to look at her nameplate, as I was in shock.)

I also spoke with the Dayton police, the Dayton airport police, and left a message for the TSA manager for the Dayton airport. I intend to request the TSA to arrange for counseling services to be provided to me, so I can deal with the aftermath of the sexual assault that took place, caused by the specific touching actions and failure to inform me of the policies by the TSA agent.

I am speaking out against the TSA and share my sexual assault case to ensure that this does not happen to anyone else, anywhere.

I will not be a silent victim of sexual assault by a TSA agent. Total Sexual Assault.

I am calling for immediate change to this new enhanced body patdown search.

I am calling for the TSA agent who sexually assaulted me to be fired.

I am calling for you, a fellow American, to stand up against these new enhanced full body patdown search procedures of the TSA.

Please note: I do plan on flying back to Ohio on Monday, because it will take me too long to drive home from Texas. I do not however intend to fly again until this search policy of sexual molestation is revoked by the TSA.

I will leave you with this thought: “It is acceptable and encouraged that a TSA government official can do something to an American citizen that US military personnel cannot do to a member of the Taliban.”

*UPDATE: Thank you all for the links and information about where and with whom I can share this. I am continuing to take action. Please feel free to leave other helpful information you find. I will be turning on comment moderation for the remainder of the day.

**UPDATE #2: I am in no way trying to belittle the experiences of sexual assault experienced by others. I hurt and ache for others who have been sexually assaulted.

**UPDATE #3: If you are interested in me sharing my story on your radio or news program, please email tsasexualassault (at) gmail.


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: security; sexualassault; tsa; tsapervs; tsascanners
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120 ... 181-191 next last
To: Chuzzlewit

Bull hockey!!! I HATE IT!!! It’s just another way for the government to become even more intrusive.


81 posted on 11/18/2010 9:32:27 AM PST by MsLady (If you died tonight, where would you go? Salvation, don't leave earth without it!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Chuzzlewit

Mass hysteria?

“Those who would give up an essential Liberty for temporary safety, deserve neither liberty nor safety.” You deserve neither.


82 posted on 11/18/2010 9:32:27 AM PST by Freedom_Is_Not_Free (TSA apologists deserve neither Liberty nor Safety - Ben Franklin, 2010.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: All

Mark Steyn (Rush) is doing a great job with this!


83 posted on 11/18/2010 9:32:37 AM PST by steve86
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 72 | View Replies]

To: butterdezillion
I am not a criminal-minded person but even I can think up ways to easily get past these measures, and unless they were willing to literally take apart my body they would not be able to know whether I was a terrorist laden with WMD’s or just a normal person.

I agree. This is lunacy. We need to put the money into intelligent pre-screening and -- gasp -- profiling, not into this labor-intensive sexual harassment of vulnerable persons.

84 posted on 11/18/2010 9:33:05 AM PST by Albion Wilde (Government does nothing as economically as the private sector. - Ronald Reagan)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 62 | View Replies]

To: hoyt-clagwell
The touching is outside of the clothes

Not always.

Local man claims TSA pat-down went too far

85 posted on 11/18/2010 9:33:29 AM PST by Paine in the Neck (Napolean fries the idea powder.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: skyman

Have you seen this? I wonder if it’s true????

“Napolitano considering allowing Muslim women to pat themselves down at Airports!”

http://www.greeleygazette.com/press/?p=6687


86 posted on 11/18/2010 9:34:00 AM PST by RushIsMyTeddyBear (Not under the influence of Hope-nosis.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ruiner

This is pretty much about war here—the citizens vs. tyranny in the form of the TSA, at the behest of the Manchurian Candidate in Chief and his minions. I think you’re mistaking this discussion for a meeting of the Miss Manners discussion group. The gent in question, a father of two of his own daughters, was assailing those of us who choose freedom over tyranny, and the right not to be touched in private places by strangers—all for the right to board an airplane.


87 posted on 11/18/2010 9:34:40 AM PST by MizSterious ("Those who make peaceful revolution impossible will make violent revolution inevitable." -JFK)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 71 | View Replies]

To: Chuzzlewit

Get off this Site!


88 posted on 11/18/2010 9:36:01 AM PST by factmart
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: hoyt-clagwell

Please. Read the article. They are indeed touching beneath the clothing. That is my documentation. Please show rules, regulations or other documentation to back up YOUR claim.


89 posted on 11/18/2010 9:36:17 AM PST by MizSterious ("Those who make peaceful revolution impossible will make violent revolution inevitable." -JFK)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 75 | View Replies]

To: skyman

“All that is necessary for the triumph of evil is that good men do nothing.” (Edmund Burke)

Like this woman, we all need to do SOMETHING.


90 posted on 11/18/2010 9:37:00 AM PST by RobRoy (The US Today: Revelation 18:4)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: factmart

factmart says get off this site?

ohhh the humanity..wow that was clever. no room for conservatives to have a different opinion.


91 posted on 11/18/2010 9:38:20 AM PST by Chuzzlewit
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 88 | View Replies]

To: butterdezillion
Makes me wonder if this isn’t just an outright attempt to get us to revolt, or to see how far we will bend over for them before revolting. Or maybe an attempt to run the airlines out of business. I don’t know. But it smells to high heaven, and it’s totally useless for security purposes.

I've had the same exact thoughts.

92 posted on 11/18/2010 9:38:41 AM PST by Las Vegas Ron (Moderates manipulate, extremists use violence, but the goal is the same.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 78 | View Replies]

To: skyman

This insanity HAS to stop!


93 posted on 11/18/2010 9:39:27 AM PST by MissTed
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Chuzzlewit

>how about you people getting some perspective.<

How about you realizing this pony show by TSA does nothing to protect the public, nor does it fall within constitutional boundaries.

If outrage at the blatant disregard of our civil liberties is so offensive to you, why on earth do you bother posting on a conservative forum?


94 posted on 11/18/2010 9:39:30 AM PST by Darnright (There can never be a complete confidence in a power which is excessive. - Tacitus)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Chuzzlewit

>>how about you people getting some perspective.<<

I agree. Here is some perspective:

People willing to trade their freedom for temporary security deserve neither and will lose both.

And her fourth amendment rights were clearly violated - even if the TSA agent DID tell her what she was going to do.


95 posted on 11/18/2010 9:40:25 AM PST by RobRoy (The US Today: Revelation 18:4)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Girlene

I wonder if they’ve been mixing bird flu and swine flu samples lately - got any particularly contagious mixes ready for dissemination.

Seriously, are they going to do this kind of inspection on people who fly with masks because they are afraid of catching swine flu?

There are so many really malevolent reasons someone could want to do these searches and the reason given (security) is not even accurate. With the extreme stuff this administration has been willing to CRAM DOWN OUR THROATS there is a reason we don’t trust them. At this point they are mocking us, fiddling with our stuff to see if we’ll sock them in the mouth. Whether we are capable of socking them in the mouth.

If they found out we’re incapable then all bets are off as to what they will do next.


96 posted on 11/18/2010 9:41:56 AM PST by butterdezillion (.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 79 | View Replies]

To: Chuzzlewit

I have a different opinion: In my opinion, you chose your handle well.


97 posted on 11/18/2010 9:43:10 AM PST by Zarro (Hands off Our Junk!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 91 | View Replies]

To: fantail 1952

>>What they are doing is not only unconstitutional (4th Amendment) but is specifically prohibited by FEDERAL LAW, and anyone performing these intrusive searches, and those that order them, are liable for prosecution for sexual assault:

“Under 18 U.S. Code Section 2244, “ ‘sexual contact’ means the intentional touching, either directly or through the clothing, of the genitalia, anus, groin, breast, inner thigh or buttocks of any person with an intent to abuse, humiliate, harass, degrade.”<<

But they are just following orders. ;)


98 posted on 11/18/2010 9:43:10 AM PST by RobRoy (The US Today: Revelation 18:4)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: Darnright

Complete pony show!

The southern border, within an hour of my house, is completely wide open, full of criminals walking over at will, bringing everything from diseases to weapons with them. They can’t even get so much as a red light speeding ticket under the cameras that watch US citizens 24-7 in southern Arizona.

And of course, this latest police state move is all about controlling the dumb American masses, while all the actual criminals roam about freely.


99 posted on 11/18/2010 9:43:24 AM PST by Borax Queen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 94 | View Replies]

To: Chuzzlewit
You are no Conservative!
100 posted on 11/18/2010 9:43:35 AM PST by factmart
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 91 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120 ... 181-191 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson