Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Almost arrested for refusing the TSA pat-down.
Mike Evers

Posted on 11/17/2010 11:22:37 AM PST by Mike Evers

Very unpleasant experience today with TSA employees on a mission from God to conduct full body pat-downs whenever they could. You’ve heard about it. You’ve seen it on television. Well, it actually happened to me this morning and I almost went to jail over it.

I was attempting to fly out of Sarasota, Florida to Atlanta, Georgia today. I cleared security and got out to my gate only to discover the flight was delayed for another hour and a half. So I exited the boarding area and went to one of the restaurants in the main terminal. When I attempted to go back through security I was detained and told to sit in a Plexiglas cubical. I was now separated from my carry-on bag, my shoes, wallet, cell phone, watch and belt. Eventually a TSA employee entered and began to describe the procedures he was going to use to pat-down my entire body. I declined, and said I wanted to go back through the scanner. After all, I had cleared it earlier in the morning, and there was nothing new on my person. Perhaps it was just a misreading.

Well, they would have none of that. A very pompous little supervisor came over and asked me if I wanted to fly today. I informed him that was my intention. Otherwise, why would I be in his little plexiglass cubical. I told him I did not wish to submit to the full body pat-down because I believe it is unwarranted and potentially an unconstitutional invasion of my right to privacy—you know, the privacy right the Supreme Court says is in the Constitution even though there are no such words to that effect. Not persuaded by my argument, the supervisor told me to submit or he would have me arrested. I asked what law I was allegedly violating. He said refusal to submit to federal authority. I replied that I thought there were less intrusive alternatives. He said “No,” and once again demanded that I submit. I declined, so he brought over his superior and three Sheriff’s deputies. Now it was getting interesting.

So much time was taken up with all this nonsense that I missed my flight. When I informed them that I wished to leave the screening area so I could see about another flight I was advised that I was not allowed to leave. Now that I had tripped into their briar patch I either submitted to their search or face arrest. I contemplated the arrest scenario in earnest. When I was in law school 30 years ago, I don’t recall things being like this. Certainly there have been some changes, especially after 9-11, but full body pat-downs and groping of genitalia? When did all this come about Janet Napolitano? Last week? Well, I don’t think it will be around six months from now, so enjoy it while you can.

Facing certain arrest if I refused to submit to their police tactics, I agreed to the search and was led to a private cubical with frosted glass to keep things a bit more private. A Sheriff’s deputy stood inside because I said I did not wish to be without witnesses should the TSA employee get a bit too frisky while feeling every inch of my body, and I do mean “every inch!” Ladies, you are going to love this new procedure when you get singled out for “special” treatment. And guys, you are not going to like it one bit. No happy ending!

Naturally, the extraordinary feel-down didn’t produce anything explosive, or otherwise. Nevertheless, I was informed that the contents of my carry-on bag needed to be searched. Once again, I protested, informing them that it had already passed through screening on the x-ray conveyor belt. Well, now things were different. Now that I was getting the “special” treatment, the entire contents of my bag were laid out on the table for all to see. About 13 local and federal agents gathered around for this little training exercise, or as our beloved President Obama would call it, a “teachable moment.” Fortunately, I wasn’t carrying any sexy lingerie or other items that could cause one to blush. And the extra look-through didn’t produce anything explosive or dangerous, even though I mentioned that my house key could be used to poke out someone’s eye. They failed to see the humor in that observation and stuffed my belongings back into the bag and escorted me out of the screening area and into the ticketing terminal. I got booked on a late afternoon flight, rented a car for three hours ($18 is a lot cheaper than a taxi), and came home to catch on some work before returning to the brave new world of TSA dominance.

As a Million Miler with Delta, I have a little bit of experience with this whole flying thing. I was flying long before 9-11 brought about all this beefed up security and intrusiveness. I’ve faced plenty of airport security issues about the decade, had valuable items stolen from my checked bags by TSA employees, and now this arrogant display of unbridled assault and battery on my body, all in the name of protecting the American public. I publish this missive and add my voice to the growing tide of rebellion over this unprecedented intrusion against our personal freedom.

Now, it’s time to head back to the airport and pray that there has been a shift change in the screening area. If not, please come visit me wherever they decide to lock me up.


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Front Page News; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: 4thamendment; chat; grope; notbreakingnews; nudeoscope; tsa; tsapervs; vanity; xray
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100 ... 341-345 next last
To: SpaceBar

Unfortunately most will submit. I know I will have to submit. I have a security clearance and don’t want to lose it when traveling for the government.

If flying on my personal time I would definitely refuse.

We need a real rosa parks moment.


61 posted on 11/17/2010 11:47:03 AM PST by for-q-clinton (If at first you don't succeed keep on sucking until you do succeed)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

To: pillut48

Just sent a letter to Delta that they lost four flights this coming year. They need to get lobbying.


62 posted on 11/17/2010 11:47:11 AM PST by Lazamataz (Pelosi: Like a rapist, PROUD of their handiwork.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: Paladin2

I like it! Something along the lines of ‘blow me’ .....

;)


63 posted on 11/17/2010 11:47:28 AM PST by tgusa (Investment plan: blued steel, brass, lead, copper)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Mike Evers
The first mistake was leaving the secured area. That just gives TSA another shot at you. The person checking ID/boarding passes may have remembered you or you ID’ed your self by casual conversation as a re-enter. That just makes it more likely for a secondary screening episode. The TSA may be pure lard inside but have 12” of armor plate up front. They are well equipped for a direct confrontation.

I am not saying what the TSA is doing is right or the Napoleon wannabe supervisor handled the situation well. Its just that they are low on the food chain along a attitude to match and are doing what they are told.

Their reflex reaction is always up the ante and to involve a LEO as muscle.

64 posted on 11/17/2010 11:47:57 AM PST by Polynikes (Haakkaa Paalle)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: relictele

I can imagine it.

Barack Obama and Janet Napelitano would tell their agents to stop it because illegals can do whatever they want in the United States while they go out of their way to limit the rights of American citizens.

This is the nature of the evil liberal beast in all its forms.


65 posted on 11/17/2010 11:48:06 AM PST by radpolis (Liberals: You will never find a more wretched hive of scum and villainy)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: Paladin2

ROFLOL!!


66 posted on 11/17/2010 11:48:06 AM PST by Osage Orange (MOLON LABE)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Outlaw Woman

I was considering putting on a strap on :-) or as someone in another thread suggested...wear a kilt without underwear.
And to kick it up a notch...throw a liberal amount of KY or Vaseline on the hangdown :-)


67 posted on 11/17/2010 11:48:39 AM PST by for-q-clinton (If at first you don't succeed keep on sucking until you do succeed)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies]

To: relictele

NO CONTROLLING LEGAL AUTHORITY !!!


68 posted on 11/17/2010 11:48:49 AM PST by Hoodat ( Don't touch my junk, Bro !)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: for-q-clinton

And the reason dressing as a muslim and carrying a koran would work is because some balsy muslims before you stood up to the system. The right needs to learn a few lessons about real social hand-to-hand combat from the left.


69 posted on 11/17/2010 11:48:49 AM PST by SpaceBar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies]

To: Mike Evers
I AM a lawyer!

Well if even YOU guys are intimidated, we are finished.

I thought you guys salivate at the chance to nail an egregious violator of Constitutional liberties?

Or is the Constitution that far-gone already?

70 posted on 11/17/2010 11:49:15 AM PST by Lazamataz (Pelosi: Like a rapist, PROUD of their handiwork.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies]

To: Mike Evers; All

I wonder what would have happened if after declining the pat down search if you instead offered to drop your drawers and raise your shirt for a visual inspection instead of the groping? You know at my age it is a way of getting even, what has been seen can not be unseen, they would have to live with that image for the rest of their lives!


71 posted on 11/17/2010 11:49:34 AM PST by eastforker (Visit me at http://www.eastforker.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Never on my watch
I am of the call a lawyer opinion, but it seems they separated him from his phone.

So the thug claimed he was about to commit some 'crime' for not allowing himself to be sexually assaulted. At the very least, when being accused of this, it would be best your attorney is involved and speaks for you to the "authorities" rather then you attempt to handle it on your own. Maybe you should refuse to speak with them until they contact your attorney for you if your phone isn't handy. If they treat you like a common criminal then they need to deal with your attorney, not you.

72 posted on 11/17/2010 11:49:40 AM PST by 444Flyer ("The contest for ages has been to rescue liberty from the grasp of executive power." -Daniel Webster)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: for-q-clinton
I’m going to tell them I don’t feel comfortable being touched by a guy and request someone of the opposite sex.

And ask for clean gloves and a doctor to perform the "examination".

73 posted on 11/17/2010 11:50:06 AM PST by Jane Long (2 Chron 7:14)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: PERKY2004

Hope they bought you dinner & flowers.


74 posted on 11/17/2010 11:50:36 AM PST by sleddogs
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: radpolis

The disparity between these searches and the treatment of illegals by the federal government is simply stunning.


75 posted on 11/17/2010 11:51:18 AM PST by texmexis best
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 65 | View Replies]

To: Mike Evers

I wonder how we have survived for so long (during the Bush Adm) without having to be molested at the airport before boarding?

Maybe if the TSA (Obama Adm) figured out who the real enemy is normal citizens would go about our daily lives without this crap!


76 posted on 11/17/2010 11:51:24 AM PST by kcvl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies]

To: Mike Evers; All

I wonder what would have happened if after declining the pat down search if you instead offered to drop your drawers and raise your shirt for a visual inspection instead of the groping? You know at my age it is a way of getting even, what has been seen can not be unseen, they would have to live with that image for the rest of their lives!


77 posted on 11/17/2010 11:51:41 AM PST by eastforker (Visit me at http://www.eastforker.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: for-q-clinton
We need a real rosa parks moment.

We had it with the 'don't touch my junk' man. He was escorted from the airport and the TSA director in LA says the TSA is going to 'probe' him further and said he is liable for a fine exceeding $10,000.

78 posted on 11/17/2010 11:52:05 AM PST by Never on my watch (Touch my junk and I call the cops!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 61 | View Replies]

To: for-q-clinton

Great ideas. lol


79 posted on 11/17/2010 11:52:44 AM PST by Outlaw Woman (No Compromise!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 67 | View Replies]

To: Reagan69

When you sue the Feds, the Feds have to agree to be sued. It makes that a bit tougher.


80 posted on 11/17/2010 11:52:50 AM PST by RinaseaofDs (Does beheading qualify as 'breaking my back', in the Jeffersonian sense of the expression?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100 ... 341-345 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson