Posted on 11/11/2010 3:54:20 PM PST by Alexander Nevsky
In a series of investigative reports this week, Glenn Beck has been analyzing the five-point strategy by which George Soros and his Open Society Institute have destabilized and overturned governments in several countries, including Yugoslovia in 2000, Georgia in 2003 and Ukraine, in the so-called “Orange Revolution” of 2004. Compelling evidence indicates that Soros may have employed a similar strategy in Kenya, but with far more gruesome results.
Following Kenya’s disputed elections of December 2007, activists funded by Soros’ Open Society Institute demanded that the election be overturned. The country erupted into violence, leaving more than 1,100 people dead and some 350,000 homeless. Thousands were injured, tortured, mutilated and raped.
In his five-point regime-change strategy, Soros, 1) infiltrates countries with his operatives, under the cover of humanitarian aid; 2) takes control of the air waves by creating “independent media” under his own control; 3) destabilizes the targeted country with financial manipulations and political agitation, 4) waits for an election, then disrupts it with charges of voter fraud, then; 5) takes the streets with armies of activist youth whom Soros has recruited, trained and funded, all demanding that the incumbent step down. The formula often works. In theory, it is supposed to produce a “bloodless” coup, in which few people are killed or harmed. Things went tragically wrong in Kenya, however.
Soros began operations in Kenya in 2004. On June 1, 2005, he officially launched the Open Society Initiative for East Africa (OSIEA), with headquarters in Nairobi, and a budget of $1.1 million. An overriding goal of the new East African initiative was “to promote public participation in democratic governance” and to “promote conditions for a free, fair, and nonviolent general election in Kenya in 2007,” according to official announcements.
If indeed Soros wished to ensure a “free, fair and nonviolent” election for Kenya in 2007, he chose a curious way of going about it. His Kenyan activists followed the familiar five steps. As in previous operations, Soros began by mobilizing youth groups for political action and established what he called “independent media.”
His Youth Wake Up! campaign lured thousands of young people to all-day music events, which doubled as recruiting venues. Through the Youth Wake Up! program, Kenyan youth were instructed in “nonviolent political activism.” At the same time, Soros funded a youth radio station called Koch FM in Korogocho, “one of Nairobi’s largest and most violent slums,” as it was described in OSI’s 2005 annual report. Koch FM intermingled music broadcasts with coaching on techniques of “political participation.” The station’s signal was expected to reach over a million Nairobi slumdwellers. As it happened, Nairobi slums, including Korogocho, became epicenters of post-election violence in December 2007, as protesters battled riot police in the streets.
The election of December 27, 2007 pitted challenger Raila Odinga against sitting president Mwai Kibaki. Odinga led the Orange Democratic Movement (ODM), which was reportedly named after Victor Yushchenko’s “Orange Revolution” in the Ukraine. The name is significant, since Yushchenko seized power through mass street demonstrations, after alleging voter fraud. Was Odinga planning a similar move?
In the December 2007 election, voting irregularities were reported on both sides. Kibaki claimed a narrow victory in a questionable vote count, and Odinga contested the results. Also contesting Kibaki’s victory was a coalition of Kenyan activist groups which would soon become known as Kenyans for Peace, Truth and Justice (KPTJ). KPTJ activist Shailja Patel later wrote, “Behind the scenes of KPTJ was civil society powerhouse, the Soros-funded Open Society Institute for East Africa.” Patel writes:
“Within hours, they [KPTJ] had released a statement which denounced the credibility of the electoral process… and appealed to the international community not to recognize Kibaki as president. … The [KPTJ] direct action team would meet daily, defying the government ban on public assembly, providing a public forum for Kenyans across all sectors and ethnicities to channel their outrage into activism.”Unfortunately, many Kenyans chose to “channel their outrage” into horrific acts of violence. Documents filed by the International Criminal Court (ICC) note that, “the attacks against the civilian population in Kenya were both widespread and systematic,” and were allegedly conducted “by members of organised groups associated with the main political parties” including Kibaki’s PNU party and Odinga’s ODM party. ICC documents state that, “Political leaders … allegedly recruited gangs of youths and transported them to strategic points to unleash terror, killing and destroying property belonging to [ethnic] communities aligned to the rival party.” In a two-month period, an estimated 1,133 people were killed, and 3,561 injured. Hundreds of women were raped, and hundreds of people tortured. About 350,000 were driven from their homes.
The Soros-funded KPTJ denies any responsibility for the violence. Still, the violence helped their cause. The election was overturned. International arbitrators negotiated a peace deal, in which Odinga now shares power with Kibaki. Once more, a team of Soros-funded activists managed to stop an election in its tracks. Once more, Soros altered a country’s destiny. But this time, the price was high. Whether intentionally or not, Soros’ Kenya operation cost many lives.
Last month, Soros donated $1 million to a leftwing activist group called Media Matters for America. The money is to be used to muzzle Fox News, and, in particular, to silence talk show host Glenn Beck. Soros says that he donated the money because “the incendiary rhetoric of Fox News may incite violence.” Given what happened in Kenya, it is difficult to take Soros’ moralizing at face value.
Obama can return to Kenya at any time to reclaim his citizenship.
By scheduling the final approval of the new constitution on Obama’s birthday the Kenyans appear to me to be extending an open invitation to Obama to show up there after he is “done” in DC.
Born in Kenya Aug. 4, 1961 -> Indonesian citizenship -> Mar. 25, 2010 Kenya Parliament states Hussein born in Kenya -> a week later on April Fool’s Day parliament passes new constitution -> the new citizenship referendums adopted on Hussein’s 49th birthday -> reclaim Kenyan citizenship moments before it hits the fan.
Kenya currently has an extradition treaty with the US though that could change at any time. Just something to keep an eye out for though it could change after the fact.
“I can guarantee you that Obama was never with the CIA.”
I can guarantee you that, because of my vocation and the language skill I had then, I was offered a job in the intelligence agency, NOT because I submitted an application, but because somebody else knew my skills, however, I choose not to be tied down from what I then wanted to do. Similar, later I was also offered a field position within the U.N. organization, based on a third party knowing my vocation skills, NOT me submitting a job application. From younger colleagues as well as from retired, I learned that even the U.N. positions had some spying aspects attached to the jobs!!
It’s well known from the usurper’s own speeches that he do speak understandable language within the muzzie communities. As a side note, the Gestapo would pick-up American spy-agents meeting underground people in Gasthauses, because of a simple detail, such as eating the European style with fork and knife, they had not been taught. A European can most always spot an American the way he/she uses forks/knives!!!
When you applied for the CIA job did you have any foreign language skills???
Compared to your New York Slimes sources, I certainly would trust another New York source over NYT:
http://atlahmedianetwork.org/?tag=cia
The minimum 9 month process to enter the CIA at the time began with sending a resume in response to a newspaper ad, perhaps in the WSJ or NY Times.
If your resume survived the screening where thousands were eliminated, next came a face to face interview in a business hotel chain room in a city near you, where the interviewer gave you his name, but told you up front it was an alias.
Then they send you a huge pile of paper work and also a 15 book reading list of the most detailed books about the CIA both pro and con including the books by defecting agents, America haters and CIA haters.
I was impressed by that. I think they wanted the recruit to hear as many horrible accusations against the USA and the CIA as possible up front before you were accepted for training to make it less likely you would be swayed by the “opposition” at a later date.
I read all of the books and I base my contention that Obama was never in the CIA on that knowledge as well as the screening for any Marxist associates backed by lie detector testing as well as drug screening. History of use of any drugs was cause for elimination in the early 1980's when Obama would have been recruited. By the mid 1980's when I went through the process they changed the drug use exclusion to any one who had used within three years and they couldn't fill quotas!
A large portion of the paperwork was the standard set needed for a security clearance to be conducted. I went through two and although rejected by the CIA at the last minute when the earliest training slot was after I turned age 35, I was granted a “Secret” (lowest level) clearance related to international trade.
The security clearance paperwork requires you to list every single place you have ever resided and every place you have worked, and all of your relatives and friends with foreign connections or communist or other seditious sympathies so they can send agents to interview them. I still have it in my file. This interviewing and double-checking your statements takes six months or so.
They also ask you to write a lengthy paper on an international affairs topic of your own choosing. I wrote about the Iran-Iraq War and opined that the religiously inspired Iranians were ultimately more dangerous than the secular Iraqis.
They also schedule you for an all-day test on your knowledge of foreign affairs and political science at a local university where several hundred people show up instructed not to say much to each other. You take the test, then leave.
I had completed all of these challenges, apparently successfully as they are given in sequence and you don't get from one to the next unless you pass, except for the security clearance.
I have a relative who might have had an FBI file that might have been of concern to them.
Thank carp, I'm not trying to make an argument with you, however, what you experienced above is not more than I faced when I applied for the privilege of immigrating to the United States of America as a "normal" foreign citizen during the period of three and half years before entry visa was granted. And just remember I was not coming from high volume country either!
My paperwork, which I always take copies of contains 4 x 2" thick Office Depot hanging files in my filing cabinet under the title "Immigration papers". I didn't use an immigration attorney, but did all the paperwork manual by myself with the help of an old Underwood typewriter.!!
I gave you a link to a radio broadcast of the mentioned trial, it's about three hours and I just finished listening to it, which I can see you have not done. You may be surprise to learn how our Government is "really" operating which is swept under the rug by the State-run-Media. Have a nice Sunday, all!!!
In my view, Obama would never survive being screened out as a CIA candidate due to drug use and his huge number of associates with KGB ties and FBI files including his grandfather!
Unlike your immigration application, _all_ CIA applicants are subjected to lie detection testing to test all statements made about Marxist associates and drug use. Obama would fail and be rejected on both kinds of questions.
Also remember that after the Church Committee witch hunts in the mid-1970’s, the demoralized CIA clandestine services were practically gutted and under Carter the CIA head, Admiral Turner chose to rely on SigInt (signals intelligence from satellites and other sensors) rather than HumInt (human intelligence gathered by CIA officers posted to foreign countries to act as innocent Americans while recruiting “agents”...i.e. foreign nationals willing to betray their governments secrets).
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stansfield_Turner
“Under Turner's direction, the CIA emphasized Technical intelligence (TECHINT) and Signal intelligence (SIGINT) more than Human intelligence (HUMINT). In 1979, Turner eliminated over 800 operational positions in what was called the Halloween Massacre. In a biography published in 2005, Turner expressed regret for the dismissals stating, ‘In retrospect, I probably should not have effected the reductions of 820 positions at all, and certainly not the last 17.’”
When Obama graduated from Columbia in the early 1980’s and would have supposedly been recruited, Reagan's CIA head William Casey nearly had to start up HumInt from scratch to turn back the aggressive Soviet moves all over the planet under Carter. Screening out communist infiltrators and fellow travelers crucial.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/William_J._Casey
“Casey oversaw the re-expansion of the Intelligence Community to funding and human resource levels greater than those existing before the preceding Carter Administration; in particular, he increased levels within the CIA. During his tenure, restrictions were lifted on the use of the CIA to directly and covertly influence the internal and foreign affairs of countries relevant to American policy.
“This period of the Cold War saw an increase in the Agency's global, anti-Soviet activities.”
BTW, you comments about Americans being spotted by Europeans and Nazis, while true, do not apply to clandestine CIA officers, only to special ops officers and I think we can agree that Obama was not one of those hardened warriors.
CIA officers in the clandestine services do not try to pass themselves off as foreign nationals, but rather as Americans who are not in the CIA but have some other reason for being abroad. That is the deception. So no reason to worry about forks!
I consider Pastor Manning to be justifiably and enthusiastically outraged by Obama, but unfamiliar with the requirements for documenting and presenting evidence in a trial.
I'm not a lawyer, but I did prevail in a five-year custody battle for which I had to nearly memorize the Texas Rules of Civil Procedure (the green one that year for you TX attorneys who will know what I mean).
PING!
Sorry to see your one eye viewpoint after reading all you posted links. Seems a little like arguments from Ms/WKA and others. But still we live in free country so far!!!
Check out this thread at: http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2626481/posts
There is a guy there who thinks that those of us who see Soros as a real threat are suffering from “Soros Derangement Syndrome” and likens the same people to those who fell under the spell of Adolph Hitler as he scapegoated the jews.
Soros screwing the world ping (Yugoslavia mentioned)
Ms. WKA also makes claims he can't support. I try not to.
If you were William Casey and tasked by Reagan in 1981 to hire only the best, most dedicated, most incorruptible anticommunist patriots you could find to restart the CIA covert operations that were destroyed under Carter, would you hire Barack Hussein Obama II?
I do not believe that the CIA patriots who interviewed me would ever bring Obama into the CIA.
Believing and reality is two different options!
Your clandestine "GUARANTEE" is what makes me skeptical of the inside knowledge of the CIA!!
You make it sound like CIA is a Sunday School squeegee clean operation which I don't think at all. I believe it's full of dirty laundry and the people they hire. Of course that's something they never would admit to publicly!!!
They must have given a reason for not hiring you???
They are people and some fall short and make bad choices as in every organization.
It is not their policy to give any reason why a person is not selected as that may give away information best kept secret, especially if they failed a security check.
Having completed the application process, I was given two start dates for training at The Farm and asked to express a preference, if I had one. The first date fell before I could complete my Master in Accounting that I had been working on for two years, and the second date fell just after my 35th birthday and I requested that date knowing that it might put me over the age limit.
When I said "guarantee" I am speaking from my experience, not any authority of course. If you find that to be too strong I will retract "guarantee" and just say that based on my experience of completing the full CIA process right up to selecting a training start date there is no way that a drug using Marxist like Obama would get through the screening I went through.
Thank you. Is it your opinion that that is the ONLY way and process that CIA recruits people???
Tantalizing series “the Puppet Master”.
Um but Americans are not Kenyans.
So the unholy slaughter will not transpire.
The hotel room with legal reps is an odd feeling for sure.
No. It will target folks with specific language or technical skills and arrange for them to be approached for recruitment. Does Obama have any known language or technical skills?
As I said, when I went to take the all day foreign affairs test (it included a lot of SAT-type and IQ-type testing as well) over 200 people showed up on a campus near where I lived and it is my assumption that there were identical campus testing sites around the country administering the screening test on that date.
Getting an agent into the CIA as a double-agent is the highest priority for our enemies who were Soviet backed at the time.
People with a history of close personal and family ties to KGB-associated organizations, like Obama set off alarm bells.
UK espionage and a lot of US agents had been totally compromised in the recent past by double agent Kim Philby and The Cambridge Five. If you read his bio you will see a lot of parallel risk factors with Obama which CIA screening is designed to detect to enable weeding out such people:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kim_Philby
“Harold Adrian Russell ‘Kim’ Philby (1 January 1912 – 11 May 1988[1]) was a high-ranking member of British intelligence who worked as a spy for and later defected to the Soviet Union. A communist, he served as an NKVD and KGB operative.[2]
“In 1963, Philby was revealed as a member of the spy ring now known as the Cambridge Five, along with Donald Maclean, Guy Burgess, Anthony Blunt and John Cairncross. Of the five, Philby is believed to have been most successful in providing secret information to the Soviet Union. His activities were moderated only by Stalin's concern that he might be a double agent.[3] Philby was an Officer of the Order of the British Empire (OBE) from 1946 to 1965.”
“No. It will target folks with specific language or technical skills and arrange for them to be approached for recruitment. Does Obama have any known language or technical skills?”
After starting his school years in Indonesia as an Indonesian citizen, and being a muzzie, I presume he was learning their language, (NOT English) that would be a rare language skill that CIA may benefit from!!
40+ yrs ago I worked in Sweden learning their language, and when I meet Swedes in IKEA stores or in the Scandinavia clubs, I’m still able to communicate with them in their own language without difficulties. Something you never forget when being young enough to learn thoroughly.!!!
“Getting an agent into the CIA as a double-agent is the highest priority for our enemies who were Soviet backed at the time.”
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nZHRgTskEhE&feature=related
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.