Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Seizethecarp; LucyT

“I can guarantee you that Obama was never with the CIA.”


A pretty off the cuff guarantee from somebody who never was in the CIA and for some reason was rejected, is not giving me an assurance to its validity and I’m NOT sure of how the process really works. To put in a “work” application with CIA is one thing, but NOT a proof that other things are in play as well that’s NOT known to the public!

I can guarantee you that, because of my vocation and the language skill I had then, I was offered a job in the intelligence agency, NOT because I submitted an application, but because somebody else knew my skills, however, I choose not to be tied down from what I then wanted to do. Similar, later I was also offered a field position within the U.N. organization, based on a third party knowing my vocation skills, NOT me submitting a job application. From younger colleagues as well as from retired, I learned that even the U.N. positions had some spying aspects attached to the jobs!!

It’s well known from the usurper’s own speeches that he do speak understandable language within the muzzie communities. As a side note, the Gestapo would pick-up American spy-agents meeting underground people in Gasthauses, because of a simple detail, such as eating the European style with fork and knife, they had not been taught. A European can most always spot an American the way he/she uses forks/knives!!!

When you applied for the CIA job did you have any foreign language skills???

Compared to your New York Slimes sources, I certainly would trust another New York source over NYT:

http://atlahmedianetwork.org/?tag=cia


103 posted on 11/13/2010 2:37:11 PM PST by danamco (")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 96 | View Replies ]


To: danamco; LucyT; Red Steel; El Gato; Danae
I tested out of my Ivy League college language requirement with my AP score in a language.

The minimum 9 month process to enter the CIA at the time began with sending a resume in response to a newspaper ad, perhaps in the WSJ or NY Times.

If your resume survived the screening where thousands were eliminated, next came a face to face interview in a business hotel chain room in a city near you, where the interviewer gave you his name, but told you up front it was an alias.

Then they send you a huge pile of paper work and also a 15 book reading list of the most detailed books about the CIA both pro and con including the books by defecting agents, America haters and CIA haters.

I was impressed by that. I think they wanted the recruit to hear as many horrible accusations against the USA and the CIA as possible up front before you were accepted for training to make it less likely you would be swayed by the “opposition” at a later date.

I read all of the books and I base my contention that Obama was never in the CIA on that knowledge as well as the screening for any Marxist associates backed by lie detector testing as well as drug screening. History of use of any drugs was cause for elimination in the early 1980's when Obama would have been recruited. By the mid 1980's when I went through the process they changed the drug use exclusion to any one who had used within three years and they couldn't fill quotas!

A large portion of the paperwork was the standard set needed for a security clearance to be conducted. I went through two and although rejected by the CIA at the last minute when the earliest training slot was after I turned age 35, I was granted a “Secret” (lowest level) clearance related to international trade.

The security clearance paperwork requires you to list every single place you have ever resided and every place you have worked, and all of your relatives and friends with foreign connections or communist or other seditious sympathies so they can send agents to interview them. I still have it in my file. This interviewing and double-checking your statements takes six months or so.

They also ask you to write a lengthy paper on an international affairs topic of your own choosing. I wrote about the Iran-Iraq War and opined that the religiously inspired Iranians were ultimately more dangerous than the secular Iraqis.

They also schedule you for an all-day test on your knowledge of foreign affairs and political science at a local university where several hundred people show up instructed not to say much to each other. You take the test, then leave.

I had completed all of these challenges, apparently successfully as they are given in sequence and you don't get from one to the next unless you pass, except for the security clearance.

I have a relative who might have had an FBI file that might have been of concern to them.

104 posted on 11/13/2010 4:47:17 PM PST by Seizethecarp
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 103 | View Replies ]

To: danamco
On second thought, on seeing that the source is from Pastor Manning's “trial” I must decline and conserve my energy.

I consider Pastor Manning to be justifiably and enthusiastically outraged by Obama, but unfamiliar with the requirements for documenting and presenting evidence in a trial.

I'm not a lawyer, but I did prevail in a five-year custody battle for which I had to nearly memorize the Texas Rules of Civil Procedure (the green one that year for you TX attorneys who will know what I mean).

107 posted on 11/13/2010 6:24:26 PM PST by Seizethecarp
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 103 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson