Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Most troops wouldn't oppose serving with gays, survey finds
Washington Post ^ | 10/28/2010 | Ed O' Keefe

Posted on 10/29/2010 10:19:37 AM PDT by SeekAndFind

A majority of active-duty and reserve service members surveyed by the Defense Department would not object to serving and living alongside openly gay troops, according to multiple people familiar with the findings.

The survey's results are expected to be included in a Pentagon report, due to President Obama on Dec. 1, regarding how the military would end enforcement of the "don't ask, don't tell" law that bans openly gay men and lesbians from serving in uniform.

Some troops surveyed - but not a majority - objected strongly to the idea of serving with gays and said they would quit the military if the policy changed, said the sources, who spoke on the condition of anonymity because they were not authorized to publicly share details of the survey.

Defense Department officials did not respond to requests for comment.

NBC News first reported Thursday evening on the survey's findings.

In July, the Pentagon sent a survey with dozens of questions to 400,000 active-duty and reserve troops. It asked whether they had ever shared a room or the showers with gay peers, and how they might act if a gay service member lived with a same-sex partner on base.

Military officials did not say how many troops completed the survey, but at least 103,000 had done so just days before it was due, according to the Pentagon. A similar survey was later sent to military spouses.

(Excerpt) Read more at washingtonpost.com ...


TOPICS: Culture/Society; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: dontaskdonttell; gay; homosexualagenda; homosexuality; liberaltarians; military; propaganda; trolls
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100 ... 341-355 next last
To: central_va

Not sure if he’s paid or not, but I suspect you’re right that he’s a troll.


61 posted on 10/29/2010 11:52:03 AM PDT by paladin1_dcs
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies]

To: paladin1_dcs
Not sure if he’s paid or not, but I suspect you’re right that he’s a troll.

I have a suspicion that most trolls are paid professionals.

62 posted on 10/29/2010 11:53:12 AM PDT by central_va (I won't be reconstructed, and I do not give a damn.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 61 | View Replies]

To: WestwardHo
You have no idea how disgusting it is to share the barracks with a bunch of lesbians. They are just as “in your face,” and aggressive as the men.

And aggressiveness is a *bad* thing? This is the military we're talking about, not the church quilting circle... right?

Just sayin' is all... :~)

63 posted on 10/29/2010 11:54:32 AM PDT by HairOfTheDog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: PeterPrinciple
High moral behavior something I agree on. So why don't we exclude all persons from the military with bad credit, bad job history, divorces, are behind on child support, who show disrespect to their parents, and who commit adultery.

So that leaves about a few thousand persons from each state to serve in the military.

Sorry, but the human condition is a lot less than perfect. I like the goal however.

64 posted on 10/29/2010 11:55:23 AM PDT by blackdog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies]

To: central_va

Maybe on some sites, but I’ve known too many people under 25 who troll just to start a fight. I suspect that this may be the case here. If he comes back with nothing but talking points, he’s paid. If he gets mad and starts in on the personal attacks, he’s under 25 and just trolling for fun.


65 posted on 10/29/2010 11:55:46 AM PDT by paladin1_dcs
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 62 | View Replies]

To: blackdog
I'm confused though.......What does sexuality have to do with being committed or professional?

Nothing, unless you're more concerned that everyone know you are a "gay" serviceman/woman rather than just a serviceman. I think it shows where your real commitment lies.

Unfortunately, I can't take you seriously since you threw out the race=sexuality canard in another post. At that point, in my eyes, you lost your credibility.

66 posted on 10/29/2010 11:55:55 AM PDT by Shethink13
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

Military policy is not determined by referendum, so the question is moot.


67 posted on 10/29/2010 11:58:07 AM PDT by Blood of Tyrants (Islam is the religion of Satan and Mohammed was his minion.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: DAC21

My wife never received a survey. It was one piece of junk mail we wanted to get.


68 posted on 10/29/2010 11:58:12 AM PDT by newnhdad (The longest of journeys begins with one step.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: blackdog
High moral behavior something I agree on. So why don't we exclude all persons from the military with bad credit, bad job history, divorces, are behind on child support, who show disrespect to their parents, and who commit adultery.

Most of those things is addressed in the UCMJ now as well as homosexuality - not tolerated.

69 posted on 10/29/2010 11:58:15 AM PDT by central_va (I won't be reconstructed, and I do not give a damn.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 64 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

Israel barely held their own in the last little clash in Lebanon and are a far cry from the past.


70 posted on 10/29/2010 11:59:16 AM PDT by Blood of Tyrants (Islam is the religion of Satan and Mohammed was his minion.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: blackdog

High moral behavior is something you agree with? I ain’t buying it bub. If that were the case, why would you want moral degenerates in the service with you? You do realize that that is what homosexuals are, don’t you?


71 posted on 10/29/2010 11:59:59 AM PDT by paladin1_dcs
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 64 | View Replies]

To: All

This is just the media setting the stage for Obama to repeal DADT in the lame duck session..


72 posted on 10/29/2010 12:00:12 PM PDT by newnhdad (The longest of journeys begins with one step.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

Israel barely held their own in the last little clash in Lebanon (okay, I am exaggerating a little) and are a far cry from the past.


73 posted on 10/29/2010 12:00:46 PM PDT by Blood of Tyrants (Islam is the religion of Satan and Mohammed was his minion.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: HairOfTheDog
I made the same observation, but didn't say anything.

IMHO the drill sergeants need to weed out the unprofessional and uncommitted, as well as the unintelligent candidates in Basic Training.

I know that right now they kick out about 20% during basic due to personality/charicter flaws. I trust the ones giving basic training to spot what will not serve us well as a country. Gay, straight, or otherwise. No political agendas, just pure talent.

74 posted on 10/29/2010 12:01:45 PM PDT by blackdog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 63 | View Replies]

To: newnhdad
This is just the media setting the stage for Obama to repeal DADT in the lame duck session..

I think we get that. And the paid trolls are out in force too.

75 posted on 10/29/2010 12:01:55 PM PDT by central_va (I won't be reconstructed, and I do not give a damn.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 72 | View Replies]

To: newnhdad
This is just the media setting the stage for Obama to repeal DADT in the lame duck session..

Could be. But it also shows that most of the soldiers with their perspectives and priorities in order will not fall into quivering hysterical fits because of this inevitability. Good for us.

76 posted on 10/29/2010 12:03:43 PM PDT by HairOfTheDog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 72 | View Replies]

To: HairOfTheDog
Could be. But it also shows that most of the soldiers with their perspectives and priorities in order will not fall into quivering hysterical fits because of this inevitability. Good for us.

Paid troll, nothing more. Do you work for the DNC or WaPo?

77 posted on 10/29/2010 12:05:35 PM PDT by central_va (I won't be reconstructed, and I do not give a damn.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 76 | View Replies]

To: paladin1_dcs
Maybe on some sites, but I’ve known too many people under 25 who troll just to start a fight. I suspect that this may be the case here. If he comes back with nothing but talking points, he’s paid. If he gets mad and starts in on the personal attacks, he’s under 25 and just trolling for fun.

The two trolls on this thread are pros, they say that DADT is no big deal then they go on and on. Post after post of talking points.

78 posted on 10/29/2010 12:07:53 PM PDT by central_va (I won't be reconstructed, and I do not give a damn.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 65 | View Replies]

To: paladin1_dcs
Thoughts?

Nothing profound, just that you may be right.

79 posted on 10/29/2010 12:10:05 PM PDT by steve86 (Acerbic by nature, not nurture)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]

To: Shethink13
I wouldn't want to have to put my trust into someone who's priority is for the world to know their sexual preference. There's an agenda here, and it ain't the defense of the nation.

You have said all that needs to be said about the subject.

80 posted on 10/29/2010 12:12:46 PM PDT by eddie willers
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100 ... 341-355 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson