Posted on 10/13/2010 3:04:13 PM PDT by BuckeyeTexan
On consideration of the Petition for Extraordinary Relief in the Nature of a Writ of Mandamus and Application for a Stay of Proceedings, the petition is DENIED.
(Excerpt) Read more at caaflog.com ...
Bull.
Rest easy. She ain’t going anywhere just because I think she should.
“...to drive her away is also wrong.”
Maybe.
But it could be fun.
Bull? I know bull when I see it.
Wow, spoken like a true Obot.
I will!
Thanks Star!
It makes no difference to me, really.
For my crime of holding differing opinions, you’ve insulted me every chance you got from day one. As a consequence of that, I’ve never had any respect for your opinions or for you as a person.
I’ve found you to be an angry and irrational individual.
I fear you are lashing out as a means of dealing with an unfair world.
And that just makes me sad.
If you want to take up the conversation about verification vs. certified copy again—I promise to do it with less of an accusatory tone and we can continue it privately (or not at all) if you wish.
In all fairness, I did ask you about the Oahu anomaly before and privately, and you did to brush it off. I was just looking for answers and didn’t get one.
Anyway, just let me know...
I just want to know if Danae may have INADVERTENTLY received a verification rather than a certified copy when she received her ‘Certification of Live Birth.’
~~~~
She didn’t order a certified copy and didn’t get one.
Verification. Certification. Who cares?
Danae proved that the HDOH has original birth certificates so there is no reason on earth why Obama can’t get a copy of his. If he has one.
We’ve all seen Danae’s BC and COLB and we’ve seen the folds in the papers.
Now where are the folds in the fightthesmears COLB?
http://fightthesmears.com/articles/5/birthcertificate.html
But they mysteriously appear in the factcheck.org COLB
http://www.factcheck.org/UploadedFiles/birth_certificate_5.jpg
One or both COLBs are fakes. Now why would Obama provide a fake COLB if he had a real one?
duh!
Do I know you?
Dream on.
Good thing you joined seven years after I did to call me out, eh?
More birther stupidity, I see.
You ARE aware that NO TREATY overrides the US Constitution? And that is why WKA looked to the CONSTITUTION, since it overrode US treaties with China?
And that ANYONE born in the US is a US citizen, unless (possibly, although the courts have never required this) their parents are here illegally?
Try reading the 14th Amendment, or the comments about what it means to be a NBC as decided by the Supreme Court.
And you DO realize that the British Nationality Act of 1948 is not binding on the USA?
If that helps stroke your ego, dude.
“Now, now, I skirted the line. I did not call Danae a liar. In as much as I had the skills to do it, I tried to be gentle in the way I spoke of Danae. Maybe not El Sardo but I did TRY to step gingerly around Danae’s name.”
That’s not how it appeared to me.
LTC Lakin’s Appeal Denied
Sunday, October 24, 2010 1:45:24 PM • 1,791 of 2,265
MissTickly to El Sordo; curiosity; james777; Danae; BuckeyeTexan; STE=Q; STARWISE; cripplecreek; stockpirate; ...
(Disclaimer: The following may not make me popular—oh well—here goes anyway!)
(snip)
I really struggled to just keep my mouth shut on this, but I can’t watch Danae and El Sordo and other unsuspecting people fall all over themselves about their humility and the truthfulness behind this stupid, stupid situation. There’s lies all right. Lots of them.
Of course I expect people to think and believe as they please—but personally, I don’t give this Birth Certificate and the ‘Certification of Live Birth’ any credibility—too many weird variables....I know that some of you who I included on this list KNOW what I am talking about.
Anyway, I just had to speak up on it. Sorry, Danae. Something stinks here.
“Danae proved that the HDOH has original birth certificates so there is no reason on earth why Obama can’t get a copy of his. If he has one.”
I never doubted this was true. Of course he can get one IF he has one.
“The “Civil Rights Act” IS statutory codified LAW until AND became ENGRAINED in the Constitution through the RATIFICATION as an AMENDMENT by the states!”
No. You don’t get to make up facts. The Civil Rights Act of 1866 is NOT the 14th Amendment. The 14th Amendment was ratified by the states and became part of the Constitution. The CRA of 1866 was a law, and does not supersede the Constitution.
Nonsense. The UIPA applies to the disclosure of ALL state records. When public interest outweighs personal privacy, there is no unwarranted invasion of privacy from releasing such records. The DOH has admitted there is a significant public interest. Quoting 338-18(b) is irrelevant.
If I came off like that I am sorry. Namecalling wasn’t my intent. Getting answers was my intent.
I certainly know how you behave here at FR.
Thats nice MT, and thank you for posting this. However, it does not excuse the fact you didn’t come to me first. It would have saved us both a great deal of unnecessary grief.
That being said, Polarik came back with two COLB’s which he discredited. However, this MUST be noted. You CANNOT discredit a document by looking at a PICTURE of it, or a scan. You might be able to tell if a scan was altered or photoshopped, but you can’t tell a damned thing about the document itself.
That being said, I am 100% CERTAIN, and I mean DEAD TO RIGHTS CERTAIN that my COLB is genuine and authentic. Polarik supposedly ‘discredited’ it.
In reality he did no such thing. He created a smear job. Why? Because mine IS authentic and he didn’t want any of those out there. Why? I have no idea.
Now here we go again, and instead of Polarik trying to discredit what I have gotten and posted, its you. Whats more, you claim Polarik as your raison d’etra in doing so.
Ok, So polarik discredits my papers, Polarik is then himself discredited because he was flat out wrong in his assessment of my documents. Now you are saying that because Polarik discredited himself, by discrediting my papers and failing miserably, and thus everything I do is suspect?
WTF. What the hell kind of reasoning is that?
Seriously.
This isn’t about date stamps. You don’t even know how many of the damn things are in the HDOH drawers. There could be 5 there could be 50, you have no way of knowing.
Sometimes things are just exactly what they seem Miss Tickly. My papers are legit, and legitimately came from HDOH with the authorization of Onaka, who is the one who decided to release it to me, not that he had much of a choice.
Now you can accept that or not, thats beyond my control. However, I would suggest you drop this line of investigation because its a waste of time. Nothing will come of it, mostly because you don’t have the actual date stamps in the HDOH nor do you know how many there are. There is no resolution for you here.
All there is here, is what appears to be another attempt to discredit me.
That ain’t sittin so well with me at the moment.
“It was conferred on him & that form of subjectship is NOT part of our Supreme Law although it does recognize it does exist.”
We are not under feudal law. However, the legal terms used by the founders are based on English common law, so that is how the Supreme Court determined the meaning (original intent) of NBC - by using the analogous phrase NBS, which only differs in form of government.
When the Founders wrote and ratified NBC, the meaning comes from the legal term NBS found in common law - that is what they intended. We are not under common law, but the lingua franca of the Revolutionary lawyers was that of common law.
Since there is no phrase ‘natural citizen’ in the Constitution, it has no particular impact on our law. But they DID use the phrase NBC, so it DOES apply.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
