Posted on 10/13/2010 3:04:13 PM PDT by BuckeyeTexan
On consideration of the Petition for Extraordinary Relief in the Nature of a Writ of Mandamus and Application for a Stay of Proceedings, the petition is DENIED.
(Excerpt) Read more at caaflog.com ...
Wait a minute. What credibility am I supposed to be protecting? I don’t claim to have any answers or records or documents. I am just reading what other people have posted and commenting on it.
If I am not credible to comment, meh, who cares?
Without going through every ink- and toner-related post to see if this has been mentioned, I just wanted to say that it occurred to me that the two pieces of paper might not have come from the same printer. Did we all just assume they did? I could see a situation (especially given Danae’s description of the office) where there was a toner-based photocopier for the bc itself and an inkjet printer for the receipt, which would make the latter more likely to smudge.
Well, that’s good to know at least.
Not a cool move to call a respected FReeper a liar around here.
When you mentioned verification, I was pointing out that the receipt for the LFBC includes a check box area for verifications. I wasn't addressing that question you have, but simply pointing out that the layout of the receipt is exceptionally well-detailed (although I do wonder why it has Divorces in plural when the other types of records are singular). IIRC, Dana's alleged COLB has the raised seal on it, so it doesn't seem like that would be a mistitled verification, unless they inadvertently stamped it too.
I don’t think it’s an issue at this point, she has supplied the photos to support her story. I am just being a hard*ss and wanted them sooner.
We are at a stale mate, but Danae’s done what she could to support her story.
It must be called a “certification” for a reason—perhaps they do stamp and emboss certifications.
Now, now, I skirted the line. I did not call Danae a liar. In as much as I had the skills to do it, I tried to be gentle in the way I spoke of Danae. Maybe not El Sardo but I did TRY to step gingerly around Danae’s name.
Sorry libtard, you don’t get to write revisionist history at FR.
Your morally repugnant behavior wasn’t a result of poor diplomacy skills. It’s a direct consequence of the poor quality of your character and the mental disorder from which you suffer as a liberal.
You didn’t simply voice your suspicions and ask for clarification. You impugned the character of two freepers, called them liars, questioned their motives, and then demanded to be proved wrong within a specific timeframe.
Go sell your tripe somewhere else.
Sorry libtard, you don’t get to write revisionist history at FR.
Your morally repugnant behavior wasn’t a result of poor diplomacy skills. It’s a direct consequence of the poor quality of your character and the mental disorder from which you suffer as a liberal.
You didn’t simply voice your suspicions and ask for clarification. You impugned the character of two freepers, called them liars, questioned their motives, and then demanded to be proved wrong within a specific timeframe.
Go sell your tripe somewhere else.
Speaking of that. In Calvin's Case, it mentions: "by the law of nature; It followeth, that Calvin the Plaintiff being born under one ligeance to one King, i.e. of Scotland. cannot be an alien born" and "in case of an alien born, you must of necessity have two several ligeances to two several persons." IOW, IIUC, this is saying that if you have dual allegiance at birth, you would be considered 'alien born.' If you were born under ONE allegiance to ONE country, then you are 'natural born.' Clearly, under English common law, Obama was born (and he admits through his FTS website) with two allegiances, simply by the virtue of having parents of different nationalities.
Bite me, obot.
Bull.
Re-read your own posts.
Perhaps the story as told just didn’t make sense to her.
No thanks. Stay classy though! /s
P.S: I STILL have questions about her COLB and that long form.
STILL. Did then. Do now.
Not revising a thing.
We see Ms Tickly is being conciliatory about stepping over the line but taking advantage of the situation to drive her away is also wrong.
The Black and white copy of the long form looks like a photocopy to me. The Receipt looks to be laser printed off of a computer program which at the very bottom of the page lists the time and date it was printed.
Actually, you are correct, El Sordo. It didn’t make sense to me. And there are too many suspicious COLBs for me not to be suspicious of Danae’s.
IF you are on the level, THEN I am sorry. I cannot verify who you are or your motives, therefore I cannot offer any better of an apology than that.
Do you understand and can you live with that?
Bull.
Rest easy. She ain’t going anywhere just because I think she should.
Thanks as always, Red. I do find you comforting. I have no problems leaving by show of hands, though.
Honestly, sometimes I am just looking for a reason to stop thinking about this issue.=)
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.