Posted on 10/13/2010 3:04:13 PM PDT by BuckeyeTexan
On consideration of the Petition for Extraordinary Relief in the Nature of a Writ of Mandamus and Application for a Stay of Proceedings, the petition is DENIED.
(Excerpt) Read more at caaflog.com ...
Morning=midnight
I am forever tied to Polarik because he deliberately screwed me?
Brilliant MT. Great reasoning there. You have a serious misperception problem going on.
YOU told me you gave him your COLB. And that’s all I needed to hear to make this leap, yes.
Lapse in judgment or in cahoots? Either way it stuck with me, Danae.
I am a skeptic and a cynic on every issue. Look at my lack of religious affiliation.
It’s not the quality of the photos you just posted or what’s in them—it’s the time since I first brought it up. I am a cynic. I am sorry—I am just like that.
That may be—who doesn’t have better thing to do than this garbage. But it would be foolish of me to ‘trust’ anyone online.
Anyone. So again, don’t take it personally.
“No, not really. I had 3 assignments due for my 300 level courses yesterday by morning eastern. I also had my sonsbest friend I’ve for a sleep over, oh and 4 chapters of reading to do for my other course, he final is this week.
I had other more pressing things to deal with.”
Nothing in the Scalia quotes says ANYTHING about an 'act' of Congress. This is YOUR term, not his. Second, I've already shown you specific examples where amendments are considered by rational people to be acts of Congress ... the 14th in particular was drafted by Congress. The ratification by states is similar in process to the President signing legislation; neither changes the fact that Congress drafts bill and amendments. The 14th amendment is an example of Congress conferring citizenship.
“I am forever tied to Polarik because he deliberately screwed me?
Brilliant MT. Great reasoning there. You have a serious misperception problem going on.”
I don’t actually know what on with you two, so this doesn’t factor into anything.
And I wouldn’t question anyone else’s reasoning or misperceptions if I thought Polarik was a fit person to give my birth verification.
I told Everyone I sent him SCANS of it. That was done LONG before he discredited himself. It is because of my honesty and forthrightness that Polarik ENDED UP discredited. Ask around. I am telling the truth underntue assumption someone will check. I have significant reason to be completely honest. Anyone interested can go back and look!
Nonsense. The UIPA applies to the disclosure of ALL state records. When public interest outweighs personal privacy, there is no unwarranted invasion of privacy from releasing such records. The DOH has admitted there is a significant public interest. Quoting 338-18(b) is irrelevant.
At that time Polarik had recently “discovered” that Obamas factcheck colb was fake. At that point EVERYONE trusted him, but you weren’t HERE then. I trusted him like everyone else and when he made it clear he was looking for another authentic colb for comparison, I volunteered. So shoo me. I paid for that. For a Long time.
Notice a pattern?
"ANYONE.... if you EVER seem me try to help someone by offering up personal experiences and documents, please beat me unconscious and tie my hands behind my back so I can’t post."
Is it time for an intervention?
Barak Sr. was still under the obedience of Great Britain, not the United States. His permanent residence was still in Kenya. Being a visiting scholar doesn't put him under ACTUAL U.S. obedience.
Hawaii was and is a state in the union.
Except there's no legal and verifiable proof of Obama being born there.
... he cannot be a subject born of one kingdom, that was born under the ligeance of a king of another kingdom ...
Obama's FTS: "As a Kenyan native, Barack Obama Sr. was a British subject whose citizenship status was governed by The British Nationality Act of 1948. That same act governed the status of Obama Sr.‘s children." IOW, Obama was born under 'the ligaance of a king of another kingdom.' Ouch. That's three strikes. He's out.
Because you do come off so genuine and gung ho and helpful—I would just rather leave this alone.
It’s possible that I chalk this up in my head as a zero. I could easily be wrong about you—but I won’t ever be convinced either way. You want me to be convinced, I can’t be. I am sorry if you are on the level—I just can’t be sure of that. So take that apology for what it is.
You don’t deserve for me to skirt the line calling you a liar behind you, so I won’t. But my mind is what it is—between the Oahu being missing and the Polarik incident and the date stamps differences—I just feel your COLB and BC are not good records for comparison.
I don’t expect you or even anyone else to agree with me. And to be honest, I won’t be trusting ANY online COLBs from this point on either—not just yours. You can thank Polarik for all of this. He did screw you if you are just a nice woman trying to help sort this mess out. He screwed you bigtime.
ACK! you busted me!! Ok, break out the ducttape.
The Civil Rights Act of 1866 (14 Stat. 27)
Senator Lyman Trumbull of Illinois introduced the bill that would later become the Civil Rights Act of 1866. Trumbull told the Thirty-Ninth Congress that the proposed legislation was needed to reinforce the grant of freedom to blacks secured by ratification of the Thirteenth Amendment: “When it comes to be understood in all parts of the United States that any person who shall deprive another of any right or subject him to any punishment in consequence of his color or race will expose himself to fine and imprisonment, I think such acts will soon cease.” Trumbull declared his intention to destroy the discriminatory Black Codes. Other Republican congressmen focused on the rights of blacks “to make contracts for their own labor, the power to enforce payment of their wages, and the means of holding and enjoying the proceeds of their toil.” If states could deprive blacks of these fundamental rights, as one Congressman remarked, “I demand to know, of what practical value is the amendment abolishing slavery?”...
Although radical for its time, it is important to understand the limits of the bill. The bill plainly sought to overrule the Black Codes by affirming the full citizenship of newly emancipated blacks...
The effect of Johnson's veto was to strengthen Republican opposition to his presidential policy. Congress overrode the veto and enacted the Civil Rights Act of 1866. It also proposed the Fourteenth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution to remove all doubt about its power to pass this sort of protective legislation. Unlike the 1866 act, however, the Fourteenth Amendment, ratified two years later, employs general language to prohibit discrimination against citizens and to ensure equal protection under the laws. Incorporating these protections into the Constitution marked a critical moment in the development of federal power over the states when it came to protecting the rights of citizens. To emphasize this new commitment to federal power, the Civil Rights Act of 1866 was reenacted as section 18 of the Civil Rights Act of 1870.
Yes he did. To the point where if he comes back and stirs things up again he is gonna get the permanent ban. I was cc’ed on the email Jim Rob sent to him and another person. It’s not just me saying this.
Perhaps they only seemed contradictory because some were intent on finding contradictions?
Perhaps they only seemed contradictory because some were intent on finding contradictions?
I wasn’t here for that. I was at TexasDarlin’s back then.
And I was always convinced that Polarik was full of it.
All his evidence has done is corroborated the ‘Date Filed by” language, the border, the extra space being missing in the date...etc.. etc...
Eventually a person clues in. Your COLB is being taken down with his sinking ship. I’ve seen one other COLB with the ‘Date Filed By’ that didn’t come from Polarik and it was filed 53 days after the DOB and the Hour of birth was 6 pm exactly like it was filed by affidavit.
Nothing was noted on the ‘Certification.’
Now I will ask you directly, Danae: Did you or your mom order a ‘Verification’ of your birth, and did you leave out the ‘Island of Birth’ on purpose or on accident on your application?
If you don’t know the answers, can you try and find out from Onaka or Fukino if your ‘Certification of Live Birth’ with the missing field ‘Oahu,’ and the ‘Date Filed By’ language is really just a ‘Verification’ of your birth facts from a file maintained by the Health Department rather than an actual abstracted short form copy of your birth certificate which is ON RECORD with the Office of Health Status Monitoring?
I am aware of some of the public battles you’ve had, of course my mind thinks that the further you get your COLB away from him, the more credible it becomes. You see where I am going with that....
It’s the cynic in me.
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-backroom/2562565/posts
He was posting personal info, and no telling what else, that had to be redacted, which explains the numerous deleted posts.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.