Posted on 10/13/2010 3:04:13 PM PDT by BuckeyeTexan
On consideration of the Petition for Extraordinary Relief in the Nature of a Writ of Mandamus and Application for a Stay of Proceedings, the petition is DENIED.
(Excerpt) Read more at caaflog.com ...
Thank you Red. I needed that.=)
Anyone wanting to ping me—feel free. (Except stockpirate.)
It appears that Hawaii may not have been consistent throughout its history to stick to the same meaning in their terminology.
The post was not to criticize anyone. It was just an opinion.
Back when the board had manners you only pinged a LIST of users if they requested to be on your list.
Pinging someone who is part of a discussion is different.
Notice that she has her own self created ping list.
Before one puts documents in an envelope, one has to fold them. In doing so, one usually presses the documents together with a little bit of pressure. You have no idea how those documents came off the printer or how they were folder prior to being inserted into the envelope. They could have been folded and then rearranged in order. Who knows?
In fact, El Sordo's comment is also a speculation. The transfer of toner (likely) happened because the two documents were pressed together before the toner was dry. If they printed a large batch of documents at once, the pressure could have been caused by the weight of other documents sitting on top. Another scenario where a large batch could have printed is that the printer could have been a large photocopier/fax/printer combination used by many people.
I have extensive experience with laser printers and printed forms. The toner likely would have been dry by the time the documents were inserted into the envelope. It only takes a few seconds to dry.
Any one of several scenarios could have created the transfer of toner. Again, you make assumptions (or take someone else's) and then make wild speculations and repugnant accusations.
Whatever. BTW, I’ve never pinged anyone for anything. I guess you need to ping people who can’t pay attention.
Yeah yeah. I got the repugnant crap already.
Those papers could never have been folded in that way. It’s physically impossible. The folds on the receipt could only go AROUND the folds on the bc. This much is VISIBLE from the photos.
Please stop. What you are saying is ridiculous at this point.
I won’t respond anymore either. It’s clear you are desperate to paint some other explanation for what is just not true.
I am used to this type of distraction from your kind and refuse to participate.
Apparently not well.
The only pictures in which the long-form paper appears lighter weight than the receipt are the ones in which the envelope is lifting up the edge of the paper. You can't "see the table" in any of the other pictures. The paper appears to be the same weight in the other pictures.
Again, speculation.
The only desperation I see is yours - to get out of this conversation. So go on then.
I think you’re mistaken about the folding. Do this in you head: put the receipt on top of the bc (which is the way I think you’re saying they had to be arranged). Fold them so the top half of the receipt (with the address) is on top, so it shows through the envelope window. When you do, the bottom third of the receipt will touching the back of the top third of the bc. If there was ink/toner transfer, maybe that’s where it happened.
Dude, I initiated this conversation, I am not through with it. I am through arguing about how the impossible happened with you. Got it? Good.
I proved my point with my first comment—you continue to flounder. Bye, boy.
Perhaps, but let’s see it. And quickly.
The assumption that they were folded in that way is mere speculation on El Sordo's part. They didn't have to be folded for the toner transfer to take place.
Please stop. What you are saying is ridiculous at this point.
You should have stopped before you ever started. Next time don't make wild accusations based on assumptions. The folds are irrelevant to the transfer of toner.
And for that matter, let’s see the inside of the envelope, which would have the rest of the ink transfer.=)
“I think you’re mistaken about the folding. Do this in you head: put the receipt on top of the bc (which is the way I think you’re saying they had to be arranged). Fold them so the top half of the receipt (with the address) is on top, so it shows through the envelope window. When you do, the bottom third of the receipt will touching the back of the top third of the bc. If there was ink/toner transfer, maybe that’s where it happened.”
Impossible only in your mind. You’ve now been presented with at least three or four different scenarios in which the transfer of toner could have taken place.
The fact remains - the documents didn’t have to be folded in order for the transfer to take place. Just because El Sordo made that assumption doesn’t make it so. And his assumption doesn’t make him or Danae a liar.
The only one floundering here is you.
Could be, Red. I simply don’t know. What I suspect, however, is that MissTickly doesn’t want Danae’s long-form BC to be genuine because it destroys her theory.
Another good possibility.
three or four scenarios? Let’s see the inside of the envelope—there has to be ‘ink’ transfer there, too.
And surely with all that toner transferring all over the place, you’d see some smudging on the receipt itself?
Uhm, yeah. Ok. BT. As long as you are comfortable with what you’ve been presented, great for you.
I’m not.
You know what, BT? IF i have a theory, I will gladly say it’s only that. But, I don’t have the answers on the terminology.
You think I have some theory that I need to back up? Nope. I got no ‘theory’ and no answers. Same as you.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.