Posted on 09/18/2010 8:48:32 AM PDT by wheresmyusa
The United Nations 2nd Committee will bring to consideration full worldwide implementation of Agenda 21 to the 65th General Assembly.
SNIP: "Under the sustainable development umbrella, the Committee was expected to consider implementation of Agenda 21, the Programme for the Further Implementation of Agenda 21 and the outcomes of the World Summit on Sustainable Development; follow-up to, and implementation of, the Mauritius Strategy for the Further Implementation of the Programme of Action for the Sustainable Development of Small Island Developing States; the International Strategy for Disaster Reduction, protection of global climate for present and future generations; implementation of the United Nations Convention to Combat Desertification in Those Countries Experiencing Serious Drought and/or Desertification, Particularly in Africa; the Convention on Biological Diversity; the report of the Governing Council of the United Nations Environment Programme on its eleventh special session; the United Nations Decade of Education for Sustainable Development; and harmony with nature." :END SNIP
President Obama will attend the Sept. 20-22 Summit on the Millennium Development Goals to not only endorse "global taxes", but the full implementation of Agenda 21 in the U.S.
According to the Draft outcome document of the High-level Plenary Meeting of the sixty-fifth session of the General Assembly on the Millennium Development Goals, Pg.24 :
"Millennium Development Goal 7
Ensure environmental sustainability
77. We commit ourselves to accelerating progress in order to achieve Millennium Development Goal 7,including through:
(a) Pursuing sustainable development,in accordance with the principles contained in the Rio Declaration on Environment and Development, including the Report of the United Nations Conference on Environment and Development, Rio de Janeiro, principle of common but differentiated responsibilities,and taking into account the respective capabilities of countries,with a view to effectively implementing the outcomes of the major summits on sustainable development and addressing new and emerging challenges"
http://www.un.org/en/mdg/summit2010/pdf/Draft%20outcome%20document.pdf
Is it worth being concerned about? Go with your gut.
This one is a bit dramatic, but on point:
Global Plantation NWO Agenda 21
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nOl1LeLfQWQ
Let’s not forget, that MCCain criticized Bush for not joining the Kyoto treaty, and said he’s willing to if China and India Join. With McCain running the senate..’all things are possible’.....
How do McCain’s climate change quotes relate to our seven benchmarks?
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1963705/posts
John McCain on the Kyoto Protocol
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QE3XSjANxNk
2000: Criticized Bush’s withdrawal from the Kyoto Treaty
In May, McCain continued his assault on the White House. On May 2, he criticized Bush for killing the Kyoto Treaty at the end of March-—the treaty, originally endorsed by Vice President Al Gore in 1997, proposed to curb the global greenhouse effect by strictly controlling carbon dioxide emissions.
“I wouldn’t have done that,” McCain said about Bush’s decision to remove the United States from the long list of nations worldwide that had agreed to sign it. “I don’t agree with everything in the Kyoto Protocol, but think it is a framework we could have continued to work with. We could have fixed it.“
The implication was all too apparent: Bush should have found a way to have the United States sign on to the treaty but didn’t. The back story was implied: Because the treaty was championed by environmentalists and opposed by Big Oil, Bush caved in to pressure from the energy industry and came out against the treaty.
Source: Man of the People, by Paul Alexander, p.348 Jan 19, 2004
http://www.ontheissues.org/2008/john_mccain_energy_+_oil.htm
Energy 2001: 1st Republican to sign onto reducing GHGS
McCain put in the Congressional Record a colloquy that proposed a plan for the US to reduce greenhouse gases. McCain, who had held hearings on global warming and was convinced it was a problem, was the first Senate Republican to call for such action. “The current situation demands leadership from the US,” he said. The administration, which was in political difficulty over the global-warming issue for having pulled out of the Kyoto Protocol, wasn’t likely to appreciate McCain’s parting gift.
Source: Citizen McCain, by Elizabeth Drew, p.127-128 May 7, 2002
And McCain’s girls...much yet to be seen on how they’ll come out on all this....
[snip]Fiorina has friends in LOW places…
Carly Fiorina (aka Cara Carleton Sneed) sat on the Foundation Board of the World Economic Forum, which has observer status with the United Nations Economic and Social Council.
But congressional support for global governance will not wane on Carly’s watch. Agenda 21 and “sustainable development” are the new buzz words for “global socialism” through global governance and Carly sits on the Foundation Board at the mother ship.
This is by no means new for Fiorina though. Her affiliation with global activists dates back many years and includes some of our nation’s most nefarious characters.
An inquiring reporter worth his or her salt should be asking Carly to describe her long-term relationship with Dr. Khalid al-Mansour—aka Don Warden, Black Panther puppet master, Saudi Royal front-man and Obama education financier?
http://www.canadafreepress.com/index.php/article/23814
The name "Lucifer" means "bringer of light", it suffers negative connotations today because of the original Lucifer's lofty ambitions which caused his fall from grace. Still, not a bad name for a publishing house...
Regards,
GtG
PS Strike anywhere matches were originally known as "Lucifers".
“This is an impeachable offense.”
You can’t impeach our first Black president. It’s just unthinkable and besides, the spineless Republicants wouldn’t go along with it.
They continue to implement thier diabolical scam. UN OUT OF US!
“You can’t impeach our first Black president.”
YES WE CAN!!
“Congress authorized and funded the program under which he gave that money to Petrobras. Look it up”
I can’t find a source that says Congress voted to loan and or guarantee any money to Petrobras but neither did I find source that says 0dumbo authorized it.
All I did find was that it was the US Export-Import Bank that in April 2009 approved a 2 billion $ loan to Petrobras.
Apparently this bank has authority to do this which should be changed. Noone outside Congress should have the authority to use so much of our money.
The theory behind loaning this Brazilian company money for offshore drilling is to encourage Petrobras to buy American products.
I hope some follow through and oversight is in place.
OTOH 0dumbo probably can give funds to the UN
Not rocket science. Yes, Congress authorized and funded the Import-Export Bank. The I-E Bank is the vehicle through which these transactions are carried out. THE I-E BANK OPERATES THE PROGRAM. Congress appropriates the money for it each and every year. It is the same program they used to loan the Mexican state oil monopoly that $1 billion earlier this month. The I-E Bank has been doing stuff like this since 1945, only in the past it was never used to undermine our own economy.
Spineless republicans = Rinos. Rinos will block all challenges to dear reader and their radical agenda. The Left has taken over both parties...for a time.
The traitors are at it relentlessly . . .
the plans cited BY the leaders over the last 110 years in . . .
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/2475963/posts?page=60#60
ARE BEING CARRIED OUT AT A QUICKENING PACE.
Earth Charter 1992:
(snippets)
In almost every statement in this manifesto, there is at least one vague term that lacks specific definition. What is “sustainable” and what isn’t? What is “economic justice”? These so-called principles are so loosely defined that no one in their right mind would support them, except for those who intend to use them as a cover to justify a dictatorship. Let’s examine some of the specific proposals.
3.a. Ensure that communities at all levels guarantee human rights and fundamental freedoms and provide everyone an opportunity to realize his or her full potential.
3.b. Promote social and economic justice, enabling all to achieve a secure and meaningful livelihood that is ecologically responsible.
The problem with vague catch phrases like “fundamental freedoms” and “social and economic justice” is that they sound good but have no meaning until they are defined. Perhaps it is assumed that the global citizens are either so conditioned or so ignorant that definitions are no longer required.
The “fundamental freedoms” in this system do not (and cannot) include liberty, property or privacy; they conflict with the requirements for implementing “economic and social justice”. The only individual freedom in this system is an Orwellian “freedom to conform”.
5.a. Adopt at all levels sustainable development plans and regulations
5.b. Establish and safeguard viable nature and biosphere reserves
5.c. Promote the recovery of endangered species and ecosystems.
5.d. Control and eradicate non-native organisms harmful to native species and the environment.
5.e. Manage the use of renewable resources such as water, soil, forest products, and marine life.
5.f. Manage the extraction and use of non-renewable resources such as minerals and fossil fuels.
6.a. Take action to avoid the possibility of serious or irreversible environmental harm even when scientific knowledge is incomplete or inconclusive.
More vagueness. Who decides what is sustainable, viable, and/or endangered? Who is going to manage all the world’s resources? What would prevent humans from being classified as “organisms harmful to the environment” which need to be eradicated? Who decides when there is a possibility of “harm”, especially in the absence of scientific evidence?
7.c. Promote the development, adoption, and equitable transfer of environmentally sound technologies.
7.d. Internalize the full environmental and social costs of goods and services in the selling price
7.e. Ensure universal access to health care that fosters reproductive health and responsible reproduction.
7.f. Adopt lifestyles that emphasize the quality of life and material sufficiency in a finite world.
What is an “equitable transfer”? Will social costs include the bloated and corrupt world government bureaucracy? Who will decide what is “responsible reproduction”? Is forced abortion an acceptable policy? How about genetic screening to eliminate undesirables? Who will decide what constitutes “material sufficiency” for you, comrade?
9.a. Guarantee the right to potable water, clean air, food security, uncontaminated soil, shelter, and safe sanitation, allocating the national and international resources required.
9.b. Empower every human being with the education and resources to secure a sustainable livelihood, and provide social security and safety nets for those who are unable to support themselves.
How will “food security” be guaranteed? Which resources will be allocated and who will be forced to provide them? What is a “sustainable livelihood”? Who controls access to the “social security” gravy train?
10.a. Promote the equitable distribution of wealth within nations and among nations.
10.b. Enhance the intellectual, financial, technical, and social resources of developing nations, and relieve them of onerous international debt.
10.d. Require multinational corporations and international financial organizations to act transparently in the public good, and hold them accountable for the consequences of their activities.
What is an “equitable distribution” and who will manage it? Is it “economic justice” to force one group to pay the debts of another? Which minority group gets to define the “public good”?
12. Uphold the right of all, without discrimination, to a natural and social environment supportive of human dignity, bodily health, and spiritual well-being, with special attention to the rights of indigenous peoples and minorities.
12.a. Eliminate discrimination in all its forms, such as that based on race, color, sex, sexual orientation, religion, language, and national, ethnic or social origin.
There can be no “social environment supportive of human dignity, bodily health, and spiritual well-being” without discrimination. Is every conceivable “sexual orientation” or perverse lifestyle acceptable? What about religions that advocate the extermination of all non-believers? Why should any “minority” be treated as a special case? Isn’t that a form of discrimination?
13.c. Protect the rights to freedom of opinion, expression, peaceful assembly, association, and dissent.
13.e. Eliminate corruption in all public and private institutions.
13.f. Strengthen local communities, and assign environmental responsibilities to the levels of government where they can be carried out most effectively.
Does “freedom of opinion and dissent” include the right to actively oppose the collectivist dictatorship? Does “freedom of association” include the freedom to discriminate in one’s choice of associates? How will corruption be removed from the global government bureaucracy? How is the local community strengthened by top-down “assignments”?
14.c. Enhance the role of the mass media in raising awareness of ecological and social challenges.
14.d. Recognize the importance of moral and spiritual education for sustainable living.
Which “social challenges” and pet projects will be advertised? What “spiritual education” is required for “sustainable living”? Will forced re-education camps be required for those with differing belief systems?
15. Treat all living beings with respect and consideration.
15.c. Avoid or eliminate to the full extent possible the taking or destruction of non-targeted species.
If all living beings deserve respect, then what is a “targeted” species? Who decides? Are humans exempt from that classification?
16.c. Demilitarize national security systems to the level of a non-provocative defense posture, and convert military resources to peaceful purposes
Who will enforce the “peace” and how? What defense will we have when the global security system becomes even more corrupt and oppresive than it already is? Ask the victims of any U.N. “peacekeeping” mission.
http://www.modernhistoryproject.org/mhp/ArticleDisplay.php?Article=ArkOfHope&Entity=EarthSum92
*Quickening* Indeed!
Even faster than we imagined.
INCREDIBLE.
Another full-on display of his true loyalties by the post-American president.
This WH continues to astound me: it's either that they are completely politically inept and tone deaf, or they are dyed in the wool marxists intent on doing as much damage as possible in the time allotted to them. And that damage includes destroying his own party.
I gather it must be both, but it is still remarkable. I never thought I'd see anything like it in my lifetime.
“sustainability” is the mantra of leftist eco-fascists everywhere
you’re right, it’s usually left undefined, that way it is an infinitely malleable tool of global socialist bureaucrats
of course they never care about “sustainability” of national budgets or financial commitments, “sustainability” of unlimited commitments to welfarism and “social justice”.... or sustainability of anything that a majority of Americans actually value
You are confusing the World Bank with the Ex-Im Bank, again.
Its already on the table ready to hit the floor in Congress. It is a bill of a different name but it would be Agenda 21.
Chris Dodds little bill.
I guess nobody said there was any particular name that had to be attached.
I am not giving up my land.I will die on it if need be.
Rather like a 2400 page healthcare bill that no one has read. Treasonous...
You are the one who is confused, and don’t start in on me again. You have submitted me to some of the most ugly and uncalled for hectoring on this forum before. Anyway, the Ex-Im Bank is solely operated by the United States government. It is an independent agency of the federal government under the Export-Import Bank Act of 1945. The World Bank, though located in Washington, DC, is not an agency of the US government. Here is a link to the E-I Bank, which provided both Petrobras and Pemex with the goodies:
http://www.exim.gov/
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.