1 posted on
09/14/2010 6:20:02 AM PDT by
kristinn
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 141-144 next last
To: kristinn
Only if he’s also open to banning flag burning!
2 posted on
09/14/2010 6:21:22 AM PDT by
FrogMom
(No such thing as an honest democrat!)
To: kristinn
3 posted on
09/14/2010 6:21:38 AM PDT by
GoCards
("We eat therefore we hunt...")
To: kristinn
Bet he won't ban any kind of desecration of Christian symbols!
His ACLU masters wouldn't let him.
To: kristinn
If threats of violence trump free speech, there is none.
You’d think a Supreme Court justice could figure that out.
5 posted on
09/14/2010 6:21:56 AM PDT by
Interesting Times
(For the truth about "swift boating" see ToSetTheRecordStraight.com)
To: kristinn
What an idiot. theres a race for dumbest Justice, Kennedy or this boob.
6 posted on
09/14/2010 6:22:02 AM PDT by
drdirt333
To: kristinn
Well also Justice Breyer, BAN burning of the American flag also. Thank-you.
7 posted on
09/14/2010 6:22:03 AM PDT by
Biggirl
(GO UCONN FOOTBALL!!!!!!!!!!! :)=^..^=)
To: kristinn
Burning the flag is protected free speech but burning the Koran isn’t? Bizarro world, up is down, black is white.
8 posted on
09/14/2010 6:22:07 AM PDT by
Menehune56
("Let them hate so long as they fear" (Oderint Dum Metuant), Lucius Accius, (170 BC - 86 BC))
To: kristinn
Hello! Bye Bye 1st Amendment.
To: kristinn
A real respecter of the First Amendment, isn’t he? (off sarcasm)
To: kristinn
Idiotic! This is a sophisticated rendering of "the squeaky wheel gets the grease." You can't do/say that because someone will get violent and hurt people. The First Amendment is about to get gutted.
13 posted on
09/14/2010 6:23:59 AM PDT by
Genoa
(Titus 2:13)
To: kristinn
...this is good stuff...ban Koran burning, but letting the flag burn will only p*ss people off more...and get them to the polls.
To: kristinn
Breyer is creepy.
I think Koran burning publicity stunts are colossally stupid, but I couldn’t dream of any constitutional reason to ban them.
15 posted on
09/14/2010 6:24:28 AM PDT by
HiTech RedNeck
(I am in America but not of America (per bible: am in the world but not of it))
To: kristinn
All of which is a nonsense discussion not grounded in any reality ~ and that is because Breyer, in his real persona, is a fascist pig.
It's not the shouting of fire in a crowded theater that is the risky act ~ it's the shouting of fire WHEN THERE IS NO FIRE in a crowded theater. Otherwise, with a fire present, it's probably more murderous to NOT shout FIRE.
With 1.4 billion people already held captive by several ill-considered permutations of Islam the theater is burning to the ground.
16 posted on
09/14/2010 6:24:30 AM PDT by
muawiyah
To: kristinn
If we’re going to limit the 1st Amendment, why don’t we just ban Islam?
To: kristinn
23 posted on
09/14/2010 6:26:00 AM PDT by
pnh102
(Regarding liberalism, always attribute to malice what you think can be explained by stupidity. - Me)
To: kristinn
Making our democracy workIt works just fine as a Constitutional Republic, thank you very much.
The fact that you as a Supreme Court Justice are trying to change that make me think you should step down from your position.
24 posted on
09/14/2010 6:26:08 AM PDT by
paulycy
(Demand Constitutionality: Islamo-Marxism is Evil.)
To: kristinn
Holmes said it doesnt mean you can shout 'fire' in a crowded theater, Breyer told me. Well, what is it? Why? Because people will be trampled to death. And what is the crowded theater today? What is the being trampled to death? So are they finally admitting all the death and destruction is due to the fact muslims lack the ability to behave in a civilized manner?
If this doesn't fit the definition of 'terrorism', what does?
25 posted on
09/14/2010 6:26:08 AM PDT by
MamaTexan
(I am ~person~ as created by the Law of Nature, not an 'entity' as created by the laws of man.)
To: kristinn
Obviously, he wants to burn the Constitution.
27 posted on
09/14/2010 6:26:29 AM PDT by
MBB1984
To: kristinn
This is what’s so frustrating about our current laws - there’s no consistency. The fed. government has actually FUNDED works of “art” meant to desecrate Christian symbols and that invite people to trample on our flag. These were SUPPORTED by the National Endowment for the Arts. All kinds of offensive speech has been deemed constitutionally protected - until now. Why? Because it’s like yelling FIRE in a crowded theater? This is very very bad legal reasoning, IMO. We’re no longer a nation of laws that make sense. We’re no longer a nation of laws.
31 posted on
09/14/2010 6:28:10 AM PDT by
ElayneJ
To: kristinn
Liberal coward.
Sorry for the redundancy. Word “coward” automatically implied.
35 posted on
09/14/2010 6:28:31 AM PDT by
Seruzawa
(If you agree with the French raise your hand - If you are French raise both hands.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 141-144 next last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson