Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Sorry, you can't smoke in your own apartment
y100.com ^ | Aug. 30, 2010

Posted on 08/31/2010 7:56:06 PM PDT by Free ThinkerNY

TACOMA, Wash., Aug. 30 (UPI) -- Officials in Washington state say they'll consider moving the health battle over secondhand smoke into a new and contentious arena -- people's homes.

The Tacoma-Pierce County Health Board will consider a proposal next month to classify secondhand smoke as a "nuisance" in multi-unit housing, The Tacoma (Wash.) News Tribune reported Monday.

Backers of the measure say they want it incorporated in the state's landlord-tenant law.

"This is the last piece of the puzzle that needs to be placed," Nan Hogan, who helped write the proposed legislation, said. "We've got smoke-free motel rooms, smoke-free restaurants, smoke-free bars, smoke-free office buildings and even prisons. Why should we go home and have to breathe it there?"

Hogan is a member of the group People United for Smoke-free Housing.

In most multi-family structures, the group says, there is no practical way to seal one apartment from another.

(Excerpt) Read more at y100.com ...


TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: busybodies; lping; nannystate; pufflist; smokegetsinyoureyes
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120 ... 161-177 next last
To: bfree

Um. Why the personal attack? That tells me that you’ve lost the argument.


81 posted on 09/01/2010 11:04:22 AM PDT by Theo (May Rome decrease and Christ increase.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: MortMan

I know what “irony” means. I don’t understand how it applies here.


82 posted on 09/01/2010 11:04:54 AM PDT by Theo (May Rome decrease and Christ increase.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]

To: CSM

I went “on a rant”?

No, you haven’t seen me rant.


83 posted on 09/01/2010 11:05:28 AM PDT by Theo (May Rome decrease and Christ increase.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies]

To: libertarian27

No. May Christ alone increase.

Man, I hate pompous Papists about as much as I hate careless smokers.


84 posted on 09/01/2010 11:06:20 AM PDT by Theo (May Rome decrease and Christ increase.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 64 | View Replies]

To: Theo
Man, I hate pompous Papists about as much as I hate careless smokers.

You have not offended me, I am not Catholic, but if I were I guess I'd be real mad a you...;)

85 posted on 09/01/2010 11:12:59 AM PDT by libertarian27 (Ingsoc: Department of Life, Department of Liberty, Department of Happiness)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 84 | View Replies]

To: libertarian27

Hm. Then if you’re not Roman Catholic, why would you say that Rome should increase, and not Christ alone? Are you familiar with what John the Baptist said to Jesus about his decreasing and His increasing? It’s a pretty biblical concept that Christ alone should be exalted.


86 posted on 09/01/2010 11:19:26 AM PDT by Theo (May Rome decrease and Christ increase.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 85 | View Replies]

To: Theo
I saw your tagline

(May Rome decrease and Christ increase.)

With this cheering of stripping private property rights of others I assumed you see a need of "Rome" to increase(even if just on the population of dastardly smokers)

I viewed the phrase in a secular(governmental) nature to the conversation on this thread at hand.

This law increases the power of Rome(Government)

87 posted on 09/01/2010 11:30:14 AM PDT by libertarian27 (Ingsoc: Department of Life, Department of Liberty, Department of Happiness)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 86 | View Replies]

To: r9etb

“Why not just say you’re going to ignore what I said because you’re not willing to think about it?”

Hello pot, meet kettle.


88 posted on 09/01/2010 11:34:07 AM PDT by CSM (Keeper of the "Dave Ramsey Fan" ping list. FReepmail me if you want your beeber stuned.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 73 | View Replies]

To: Theo

“No. May Christ alone increase.”

Unless of course the increase of Rome is of the nature to make your life free of certain odors.


89 posted on 09/01/2010 11:39:17 AM PDT by CSM (Keeper of the "Dave Ramsey Fan" ping list. FReepmail me if you want your beeber stuned.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 84 | View Replies]

To: Theo

Soo... because of your one incident, ban the practice everywhere for everybody. Don’t even look at mutual accomodations, just shut’er down. I can tell you’re a moron by your tagline.


90 posted on 09/01/2010 11:42:17 AM PDT by ichabod1 (Hail Mary Full of Grace, The Lord Is With Thee...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Theo

You’re no conservative. I don’t care how long you’ve been on this site. This lady is living in her apartment, minding her own business, all of a sudden YOU (the grand YOU) move in, and her behavior is atrocious all of a sudden.


91 posted on 09/01/2010 11:51:13 AM PDT by ichabod1 (Hail Mary Full of Grace, The Lord Is With Thee...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: r9etb

Funny, it didn’t seem to bother most people that much at all before you fricking nannie-ninnies came along. Go play by yourself.


92 posted on 09/01/2010 11:53:47 AM PDT by ichabod1 (Hail Mary Full of Grace, The Lord Is With Thee...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: libertarian27
farming(dust-smell),

YEah, that's a great example as you have yuppies like r9etd and theo moving to the country, and then getting ANGRY that they have to deal with dust and manure smell, and demanding that the farmers get rid of their livestock.

93 posted on 09/01/2010 11:57:47 AM PDT by ichabod1 (Hail Mary Full of Grace, The Lord Is With Thee...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 70 | View Replies]

To: GOP_Lady

Yup us smokers told you it was coming.. next up will be what kind of foods you can eat in your own home.

If it were my apartment and I was living there, I would smoke and flat out ignore the law. Screw them. Civil Disobedience time.

Thankfully I own my own home so I am safe.. for a tiny little bit longer.. or until people stand up to these tyrants.


94 posted on 09/01/2010 12:05:55 PM PDT by eXe (Si vis pacem, para bellum)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: r9etb

No, I’m saying rights do not pertain to gratifying some individual’s peculiarities. If you grow roses, and I’m alergic to them (and some people are) I do not have a right to have the government force you to take out your roses.

I’m sorry you have a sensitive nose, but it’s your problem, not anyone else’s, and you have no right foisting your problem on others.

Here’s the principle of rights. There are only rights to do, there are no rights to have anything (except to have the wealth you have earned—by doing something productive). There is no right to have a job, medical care, education, or even food. There is no right to have an environment you like, which someone else has to provide.

Rights mean no one may interfere in your life to prevent you from living it as you choose, as long as you do not inerfere in anyone else’s—by the use or threat of force.

Anything else meant by “rights” requires the oppression of others and actually violates rights. Period.

Hank


95 posted on 09/01/2010 12:17:55 PM PDT by Hank Kerchief
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 67 | View Replies]

To: Hank Kerchief
you have no right foisting your problem on others.

Indeed, Hank.... Indeed.

I would suggest that your tobacco smoke wafting onto my clothes qualifies exactly.

96 posted on 09/01/2010 12:29:01 PM PDT by r9etb
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 95 | View Replies]

To: Theo

You rented the apartment unseen, and yet you blame her for ruining your experience. Your bad decision (to rent unseen) is the ause of your lack of knowledge of the issue (her smoke - which would be evident even if she weren’t at the apartment when you looked if it is half as bad as you indicate).

That is the epitome of irony.


97 posted on 09/01/2010 12:30:08 PM PDT by MortMan (Obama's response to the Gulf oil spill: a four-putt.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 82 | View Replies]

To: GOP_Lady

Stupid, although I wouldn’t want people smoking in my multi-unit housing due to the fire risk.


98 posted on 09/01/2010 12:33:45 PM PDT by Sloth (Civil disobedience? I'm afraid only the uncivil kind is going to cut it this time.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Sloth

By federal law, all cigarettes self-extinguish after a very short period of time.


99 posted on 09/01/2010 12:40:51 PM PDT by GOP_Lady
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 98 | View Replies]

To: eXe
Indeed, we have been saying this for years, and people didn't care. What/who will be the next villains after obesity?
100 posted on 09/01/2010 12:42:41 PM PDT by GOP_Lady
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 94 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120 ... 161-177 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson