Ann Coulter on WND: 'They're a bunch of fake Christians'

WND ^ | August 22, 2010 | WND

[RobinMasters]

WASHINGTON – Conservative pundit Ann Coulter intensified her attacks on WND last night on Fox News Channel's "Red Eye" show, accusing those at the largest independent news site who dropped her from the "Taking America Back National Conference" in Miami of being "fake Christians."

Coulter claimed she was never actually booked for the event, repeated her resentment over publishing her e-mail explanations to WND Editor Joseph Farah for appearing at GOProud's Homocon event and lashed out at WND for "pushing the birther thing," which she said is not supported by any conservatives.

"These are fake Christians trying to get publicity," said Coulter.

Previously, Coulter called Farah a "publicity whore" and a "swine" for WND's decision to drop her upon learning of her plan to speak to the homosexual Republican group.

In response, Farah issued the following statement: "Coulter called me a 'publicity whore' for my decision. But look who is on television talking about this – throwing mud, name-calling, smearing not only me but my entire staff. I will not engage in the kind of ad hominem attacks that have made Coulter so famous and that are making her even more of a media darling in this age of reckless anger and character assassination for the sake of entertainment. Every day, since we made this decision at WND, I thank God for giving me the clarity of mind and discernment to make the right choice."

[ROCKLOBSTER]

she’s an entertainer getting paid to speak.

Entertainer!? From the timbre of her books, I thought she was a conservative icon.

I'm not a "new Ann hater" I just asked a question.

But I seriously doubt most conservatives want to embrace a bunch of boy-raping disease-ridden whack jobs, as they take over our schools and other institutions.

Just label me anti homo-agenda.

[DirtyHarryY2K]

Dear Ann.. Jesus said: Matthew 19:4-6

And he answered and said, Have ye not read, that he who made them from the beginning made them male and female, And said, For this cause shall a man leave father and mother, and shall join to his wife: and they two shall be one flesh? So that they are no more two, but one flesh. What therefore God hath joined together, let not man put asunder.....

Looks ironclad to me! No perverted marriage, don’t like it? Take it up with Christ..

[Conservativegreatgrandma]

Circular firing squad.

[BiggieLittle]

Yes Jesus forcefully spoke out against homosexuality. Here are the quotes from the Bible:

Eh, I’m still looking.

It was a political meeting not a religious one.

[driftdiver]

“Entertainer!? From the timbre of her books, I thought she was a conservative icon.”

Well some have made her an icon, but she’s really an entertainer working her audience.

[BiggieLittle]

Then why do many Christian denominations accept divorce? The passage you quoted is pretty ironclad.

[freekitty]

I wish they wouldn’t do this.

[Springfield Reformer]

Totally true. I agree. I am only addressing a possible rationalization she may have used to reconcile her faith with her action. We have all been there. It’s not good to rationalize, but it doesn’t automatically render one’s faith “fake.” In fact, in an odd way, it tends to confirm it, because if you don’t really care, why bother with a clever rationalization at all?

[DirtyHarryY2K]

Divorced people have not formed activist groups demanding to be granted special rights etc.. The perverts are demanding approval... Big difference!

[fr_freak]

Ahh so you are judging her based on events that have not happened yet.

Now you are just being silly. You are implying that I can't know what she's really going to do, so I can't know whether she's going to condemn homosexuality at the convention or not. That's ridiculous. It's like saying I can't know whether the sun is going to rise tomorrow morning. Coulter has said what she's going to do, in general terms, and none of that included the slightest disapproval of the theme of the organization. I suppose we could wait until after the convention to discuss this, just so you can't object that it hasn't happened yet, but that would be pointless. We all know she isn't going to disapprove of the homosexual theme of the convention. Period.

[Old Landmarks]

Everyone take a deep breath and let your head clear. Let's use our noggins instead of just plain old emotions.

Some pleasant mood music and a good time with the family can put things in perspective.:)

[ROCKLOBSTER]

So all that conservative “red meat” was just fiction?

Are you indicating that we’ve been played, and now to are to be discarded for the gay audience?

Hmmmmmm...

I Guess the conservative book receipts must have been starting to fall off.

[driftdiver]

“Now you are just being silly. You are implying that I can’t know what she’s really going to do, so I can’t know whether she’s going to condemn homosexuality at the convention or not.”

No I’m saying you’re repeating a failed and un-Biblical strategy. Maybe she will do what you say, maybe she won’t. She usually doesn’t shy from controversy so I’m guessing she won’t.

Perhaps if you showed love for the sinner they might listen to you. As it is they are gaining political power and will force their agenda on everyone.

[driftdiver]

‘Are you indicating that we’ve been played, and now to are to be discarded for the gay audience?”

Dude you don’t even know what she’s gonna say and you’re hyperventilating about how evil she is now. That shows just how easy the liberals have it.

Throw out a little bait and the conservatives will kill each other.

[steve86]

in fact it is exceptionally juvenile in this context.

You summed up Coulter's entire working schtick in one genius phrase!

[Tex-Con-Man]

2 different articles on the subject where she is claiming there was never any money...

Coulter added that she isn’t losing any money over Farah’s decision to drop her from his conference because he couldn’t afford to pay her anyway.

From the article: CapitolHillBlue

...his group hadn’t come up for the money to book me for a speech, anyway, so he’s not canceling me from anything.

From the Article: Daily Caller

I repeat myself, Farah is the one with the track record of disinformation.

As far as proof of his dishonesty, you're on your own there. I have wasted more time clicking on WND birther links only to find out that the articles are either purposely misleading, or downright lies. I will not spend any time compiling evidence for you that provides more WND birther hits...sorry.

[truth_seeker]

“Ann is an entertainer. Farah is a nut.”

With the most important elections of my long lifetime, these two need to stfu and disappear!!

[ROCKLOBSTER]

Dude you don’t even know what she’s gonna say and you’re hyperventilating about how evil she is now.

"Dude", I'm asking you some questions, not doing the things you accuse me of. I'm speaking directly to you and your comments. Go back and read them....then maybe try a little dialog.

[Syncro]

She is going to celebrate with them and endorse their organization.

On what authority do you say that?

What do they celebrate, homosexuality? And is Coulter going to be there saying "Yea homos! Yea sodomy!"??

And how do you know she is going to endorse their organization?

I'm amazed at all the FR posters here that have made decicisions on future happenings as their names are Clara Voient.

What are the lottery numbers for tomorrow, Clara?

[Springfield Reformer]

So all you’re presenting me with is a he-said, she-said scenario, in which the only deciding factor is your lack of trust in Farah’s motives, based on evidence you are unwilling to provide. Hmmmm. OK, but I’ve got to tell you, a judge is going to need something better than that to work with. Just sayin ...