Posted on 08/22/2010 3:29:07 PM PDT by RobinMasters
WASHINGTON – Conservative pundit Ann Coulter intensified her attacks on WND last night on Fox News Channel's "Red Eye" show, accusing those at the largest independent news site who dropped her from the "Taking America Back National Conference" in Miami of being "fake Christians."
Coulter claimed she was never actually booked for the event, repeated her resentment over publishing her e-mail explanations to WND Editor Joseph Farah for appearing at GOProud's Homocon event and lashed out at WND for "pushing the birther thing," which she said is not supported by any conservatives.
"These are fake Christians trying to get publicity," said Coulter.
Previously, Coulter called Farah a "publicity whore" and a "swine" for WND's decision to drop her upon learning of her plan to speak to the homosexual Republican group.
In response, Farah issued the following statement: "Coulter called me a 'publicity whore' for my decision. But look who is on television talking about this – throwing mud, name-calling, smearing not only me but my entire staff. I will not engage in the kind of ad hominem attacks that have made Coulter so famous and that are making her even more of a media darling in this age of reckless anger and character assassination for the sake of entertainment. Every day, since we made this decision at WND, I thank God for giving me the clarity of mind and discernment to make the right choice."
(Excerpt) Read more at wnd.com ...
Do you like hate crimes laws?
Hate speech laws?
Laws forcing people to take photos of homosexuals at a same sex “wedding” even if it against their beliefs and principles?
Homosexual sex ed taught to children in grade school? What to speak of high school? Contacts where they can meet with homosexuals and learn the “gay” life?
Homosexuals in the military?
It doesn’t actually say slaves, it says ‘bondmen and bondmaids’. People who were poor bonded themselves or their children to someone wealthy. It was a form of social security. The concept of slavery as known in modern terms was referred to by Moses as “bondage”. It is also written (Exod 21:16) that anyone who steals a man to sell him shall be put to death.
Look at the context of a bible verse in order to interpret its meaning. In Leviticus 18, homosexuality is one of three sins mentioned, each given equal precedence as sinful. In order, God condemns child sacrifice (shalt not let any of thy seed pass through the fire), homosexuality (shalt not lie with mankind, as with womankind), and bestiality (Neither shalt thou lie with any beast).
God then groups all three sins under the same warning: for in all these the nations are defiled which I cast out before you. In other words, God said “I destroyed the other nations that used to be in this land because of these sins, and the same warning applies to you”!
IF we are to say that homosexuality was given equal billing with child sacrifice and bestiality, and IF we are to believe that homosexuality is now acceptable to God in this current age, then we must believe that child sacrifice and bestiality are also acceptable in our current age. You cannot have it both ways: either homosexuality, bestiality, and child sacrifice are forever sinful abominable acts in God’s sight, or all three are acceptable “alternative lifestyles.”
A conservative, common sense interpretation of Leviticus 18 demands that we understand that all three acts were and are sinful in God’s sight, contrary to His Will for mankind.
Leviticus 20 is even more specific. The sins listed as forbidden are, in order, adultery (adulterer and the adulteress shall surely be put to death), incest (man that lieth with his father’s wife), non related incest (man lie with his daughter-in-law), homosexuality (man also lie with mankind), and intra-family fornication (man take a wife and her mother). All are given equal billing. All are equally evil in God’s eyes. If homosexuality was only temporarily forbidden, then we can conclude that incest between parent and child is now acceptable. How foolish! None of these sins were temporarily forbidden, all were and are abominations in God’s sight.
As to the Homosexual theologian charge that the dietary laws would have to be enforced if we enforce the Levitical code against homosexuality, this is mere smoke and mirrors. First, the dietary laws are not even represented in these Bible texts.
Second, the dietary laws were just that, dietary laws, they were not moral laws (which the above texts represent).
God Himself rescinded the dietary laws for the sake of the Gentiles.
The dietary laws were abolished in Peter’s vision (Acts 10.14-15).
Among other things abolished in the new testament: Circumcision, ritual washing, crop mingling, blended fabrics, animal sacrifice for the atonement of sin etc..
God never rescinded the moral laws against the sins listed in Leviticus 18, in particular, the sin of homosexuality.
I believe that's exactly what Jonah Goldberg did at NRO after Ann wrote her [in]famous "convert them to Christianity" column there right after 9/11.
IIRC, Jonah said there was more to it than just that column, but that approach does seem to be the one to take when one believes (rightly or wrongly) that a columnist has crossed the line.
Every religion in the world teaches that homosexual acts are wrong.
Christianity
Judaism
Hinduism
Buddhism
Taoism
I don’t think this has been posted on this thread. Here is the GOProud’s agenda, with my notes clearly added. They are a pro-”gay” oranzition, not conservative, a front group for pushing the “gay” agenda into the Republican party.
http://www.goproud.org.php5-12.dfw1-2.websitetestlink.com/federal-legislative-priorities/
Federal Legislative Priorities
GOProud’s Conservative Agenda
The so-called “gay agenda” is defined by the left through a narrow prism of legislative goals. While hate crimes and employment protections may be worthy goals, there are many other important priorities that receive little attention from the gay community. GOProud’s agenda emphasizes conservative and libertarian principles that will improve the daily lives of all Americans, but especially gay and lesbian Americans.
NOTE: “Hate crimes” and forcing people to hire homosexuals are WORTHY GOALS!
1 – TAX REFORM - Death tax repeal; domestic partner tax equity, and other changes to the tax code that will provide equity for gays and lesbians; cut in the capital gains and corporate tax rates to jump start our economy and create jobs; a fairer, flatter and substantially simpler tax code.
NOTE: Domestic partner - more “gay” rights!
2 – HEALTHCARE REFORM – Free market healthcare reform. Legislation that will allow for the purchase of insurance across state lines – expanding access to domestic partner benefits; emphasizing individual ownership of healthcare insurance – such a shift would prevent discriminatory practices by an employer or the government.
NOTE: Domestic partner health benefits - end “discrimination” - code words for “gay” rights!
3 – SOCIAL SECURITY REFORM - Bringing basic fairness to the Social Security system through the creation of inheritable personal savings accounts.
NOTE: “Fairness” is a code word for “gay” rights!
4 – DON’T ASK, DON’T TELL REPEAL – Repeal of the military’s Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell policy.
NOTE: They want homosexuals in the military!
5 – HOLDING THE LINE ON SPENDING – Standing up for all tax payers against wasteful and unneccessary spending to protect future generations from the mounting federal debt.
NOTE: But they want government spending for “gay” rights!
6 – FIGHTING GLOBAL EXTREMISTS – Standing strong against radical regimes who seek to criminalize gays and lesbians.
NOTE: They want the US to police other countries for “gay” rights!
7 – DEFENDING OUR CONSTITUTION – Opposing any anti-gay federal marriage amendment.
NOTE: THEY WANT HOMOSEXUAL MARRIAGE!
8 – ENCOURAGING COMMUNITY ENTREPRENEURSHIP – Package of free market reforms to encourage and support small businesses and entrepreneurship in the gay community.
NOTE: Tax money to “GAY COMMUNITY”!
9 – REVITALIZING OUR COMMUNITIES – A package of urban related reforms; expanding historic tax preservation credits; support for school choice.
NOTE: They want tax money for old town parts of cities where homosexuals often live!
10 – DEFENDING OUR COMMUNITY – Protecting 2nd amendment rights.
Here’s what the GOProud has to say about itself:
Chairman of the Board, Christopher Barron:
“We are a gay organization, we only work on gay issues, we have never claimed otherwise. My God people.”
Twitter Aug 4, 2010 http://twitter.com/
I bet that you can't post a link.
“Not at all, but I wasn’t fooled when I watched The Crying Game like some around here.”
LOL!
Here ya go...didn’t say it was you, just that your comment was something a DUmmie would post:
Are you talking about one of your relatives? You didn't clarify.
What's a leftist talking point personal attack angry foul mouth guy/girl like you doing here at FR, Dirty?
A thread from 2003 that has nothing similar to my own quote...perhaps you shouldn’t have jumped in when I wasn’t talking to you if that’s the best that you can muddle up.
OK. Your link calling her “Mann Coulter” was pretty funny!
Your post: The jury is still out on whether a 6 foot tall “woman” with an adam’s apple, who hosts homocon and has never been married is really a female.
DU: She is so manly, esp. her hands...
She's single, seems to have some trouble hanging on to a man.
Same stuff, different board.
I disagree with her speaking at Homocon. But I will not attack her personally. I leave that crap to the left.
Thanks for the info, but it’s what I expected and incidentally, what I support.
I happen to be conservative on some issues, not so much on some social issues.
Excuse me? I think you bumped your head and stumbled onto the wrong forum.
Explain your self.
Then you'll run afoul of the owner of this site. Fair warning......
FR is a conservative site. We do not appreciate our members fighting against us on our conservative values and issues. If you wish to support homosexual marriage or homosexuals in the military or hate crimes against us for speaking out against government promotion of homosexuality that’s your business, but you’d better do it somewhere else and not on FR. If you value your posting privileges, that is. FR is pro-God, pro-life, pro-family, pro-marriage, pro-military, pro-traditional American conservatism and it is a privilege to post here. Those who support the godless liberal/Marxist destruction of our free society and our country are free to exercise their free speech rights elsewhere. I won’t stand in your way.
Thanks for the heads up.
Since I DO believe in private ownership rights if I were to get banned I’d take it like a man :)
LMAO you know who I'm talking about. She whores herself out in more ways than one. What's leftist about pointing out the facts?
You’re welcome. FR is VERY conservative.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.