WND drops Ann Coulter from Miami event over Homoconflict

World Net Daily ^ | 8/17/2010 | wnd

[bmwcyle]

Ann is now on the other side. She is welcome any time.

[BilLies]

"It's time FR terminated your membership...”
I guess I'm lucky it is not up to you.
You sound like a Obama troll, planting posts on FR so the Obama MSMerde can copy them and report them in the MSM in order to show the country how the Conservative wackos “think”.
If you don't like what the school boards do, vote them out; and if that is not possible,transfer your kids to another school that reflects your views and; if that is not possible, home school them.
That is what Conservatives do, the Obamanations call people names. Living in a Republic has certain drawbacks like majority rules and the winners, by and large, get to run the government.
The Supreme Court will be reversing 9th Circuit decision that overruled Prop 8, they also will be overruling the judge who said what Fred Philips does to the family of fallen servicemen and women falls under the First Amendment.

[little jeremiah]

Someone who thinks the homosexual agenda is not a danger to freedom of speech, religion and association either isn’t paying attention and sorely ill-informed, or has moral blinders on.

[little jeremiah]

Thanks for the info.

[Ol' Sparky]

The only trolls here are pro-homosexual morons like you that refuse to acknowledge the threat the homosexual agenda is to liberty in this nation.

[Ol' Sparky]

If you don't like what the school boards do, vote them out

So, let's get this right. You have no problem with homosexuality being forced upon kids without their parents consent, all while we live in a country where prayer is against the law and religious freedom is curtailed in public schools?

Public schools in a free nation should never be forcing their twisted morality upon students whose parents object. That is what occurs in communist and totalitarian nations.

I'm not surprised, though, a closet leftist like you doesn't have a problem with all that.

[Peter Libra]

My post #97 somewhat hasty needs a little clarification. The elite "public schools" which were not very public, were later said to be hotbeds of homosexual activity. The confinement of males and no females, could have brought some of this on.

George Orwell and others conceded that certain of these acts were understood by parents and educators and brushed aside with euphemisms. When the WW2 started, many of the elite got into the secret services and the British Foreign Office. Ripe for blackmail and extortion. Wicked traitors sending people to their doom.

In this way, the homosexuals created a myth of many of those types who were pilot officers being homosexual. They seem to also take historical figures, now long gone, and ascribe homosexuality to them. In Canada, some of the more militant homosexuals have enforced laws and destroyed peoples businesses. Caused grief to persons who would not "marry" them. Even having others step in and make the offer. A cruel streak resides in some of them.

[DMG2FUN]

I get a laugh out of the perverted homosexuals when they chant people must accept their perversion. The recent prison escape in AZ involved two people that were lovers. Also they were cousins. The homos are having a ball playing this up. Yet the perverted homos overlook the fact that these two are consenting adults, and doing it behind closed doors. Does that chant sound familiar? It should it is the shame chant the perverted homosexuals have used for decades to defend their perverted lifestyle choice.

[Tired of Taxes]

I have seen many times where the power/authority to set the language is the beginning of societal control.

Indeed. And it's disheartening to watch even those who were supposed to remain steadfast fall one by one. It's amazing how easily and quickly people are misled.

[freebilly]

Judge Walker did fairly well at discounting voters

Temporarily. The Supreme Court will overturn his ruling if it gets that far. If not, then there will be real problems....

[freebilly]

It’s about special privileges... being granted to a group of people, just because they engage in deviant behavior

Please....

[freebilly]

You have grandchildren? You might want to watch who is teaching them and what they are learning

I teach my kids and grandkids to stay away from people with agendas....

[DJ MacWoW]

There are real problems now.

[DJ MacWoW]

I teach my kids and grandkids to stay away from people with agendas....

Everyone has agendas. The question is what are they.

[Tired of Taxes]

That’s the reality, whether you want to see it or not.

Take my state as an example: First, our state offered domestic partnerships to same-sex couples as well as older opposite-sex couples. But, activists sued to force the state to either change marriage law or offer civil unions as an option to give “gay” couples the same “rights” as a married man and woman. (I put “rights” in quotations because that is their wording, not mine.)

A Republican lawmaker presented a bill that would give those “rights” to domestic partnerships and also open domestic partnerships to any two people, except an unrelated man and woman, with no questions asked. But, the activists fought that bill, and the state decided to go with civil unions.

In other words, two people are entitled to the same “rights” as a married couple if and only if they are a same-sex couple engaging in sodomy. Now, I can understand the state staying out of the private business of consenting adults. Not awarding them special “rights” for engaging in that behavior.