Posted on 08/19/2010 7:00:21 PM PDT by tutstar
Conservative superstar Ann Coulter today was dropped as a keynote speaker for WND's "Taking America Back National Conference" next month because of her plan to address an event titled "HOMOCON" sponsored by the homosexual Republican group GOProud that promotes same-sex marriage and military service for open homosexuals.
Joseph Farah, editor and chief executive officer of WND, said the decision was a gut-wrenching one for his team because of their fondness for Coulter as both a person and writer-speaker.
"Ultimately, as a matter of principle, it would not make sense for us to have Ann speak to a conference about 'taking America back' when she clearly does not recognize that the ideals to be espoused there simply do not include the radical and very 'unconservative' agenda represented by GOProud," said Farah. "The drift of theconservative movement to a brand of materialistic libertarianism is one of the main reasons we planned this conference from the beginning."
Asked by Farah why she was speaking to GOProud, Coulter said: "They hired me to give a speech, so I'm giving a speech. I do it all the time."
(Excerpt) Read more at wnd.com ...
Ann is now on the other side. She is welcome any time.
Someone who thinks the homosexual agenda is not a danger to freedom of speech, religion and association either isn’t paying attention and sorely ill-informed, or has moral blinders on.
Thanks for the info.
The only trolls here are pro-homosexual morons like you that refuse to acknowledge the threat the homosexual agenda is to liberty in this nation.
So, let's get this right. You have no problem with homosexuality being forced upon kids without their parents consent, all while we live in a country where prayer is against the law and religious freedom is curtailed in public schools?
Public schools in a free nation should never be forcing their twisted morality upon students whose parents object. That is what occurs in communist and totalitarian nations.
I'm not surprised, though, a closet leftist like you doesn't have a problem with all that.
George Orwell and others conceded that certain of these acts were understood by parents and educators and brushed aside with euphemisms. When the WW2 started, many of the elite got into the secret services and the British Foreign Office. Ripe for blackmail and extortion. Wicked traitors sending people to their doom.
In this way, the homosexuals created a myth of many of those types who were pilot officers being homosexual. They seem to also take historical figures, now long gone, and ascribe homosexuality to them. In Canada, some of the more militant homosexuals have enforced laws and destroyed peoples businesses. Caused grief to persons who would not "marry" them. Even having others step in and make the offer. A cruel streak resides in some of them.
I get a laugh out of the perverted homosexuals when they chant people must accept their perversion. The recent prison escape in AZ involved two people that were lovers. Also they were cousins. The homos are having a ball playing this up. Yet the perverted homos overlook the fact that these two are consenting adults, and doing it behind closed doors. Does that chant sound familiar? It should it is the shame chant the perverted homosexuals have used for decades to defend their perverted lifestyle choice.
Indeed. And it's disheartening to watch even those who were supposed to remain steadfast fall one by one. It's amazing how easily and quickly people are misled.
Temporarily. The Supreme Court will overturn his ruling if it gets that far. If not, then there will be real problems....
Please....
I teach my kids and grandkids to stay away from people with agendas....
There are real problems now.
Everyone has agendas. The question is what are they.
That’s the reality, whether you want to see it or not.
Take my state as an example: First, our state offered domestic partnerships to same-sex couples as well as older opposite-sex couples. But, activists sued to force the state to either change marriage law or offer civil unions as an option to give “gay” couples the same “rights” as a married man and woman. (I put “rights” in quotations because that is their wording, not mine.)
A Republican lawmaker presented a bill that would give those “rights” to domestic partnerships and also open domestic partnerships to any two people, except an unrelated man and woman, with no questions asked. But, the activists fought that bill, and the state decided to go with civil unions.
In other words, two people are entitled to the same “rights” as a married couple if and only if they are a same-sex couple engaging in sodomy. Now, I can understand the state staying out of the private business of consenting adults. Not awarding them special “rights” for engaging in that behavior.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.