Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

WND drops Ann Coulter from Miami event over Homoconflict
World Net Daily ^ | 8/17/2010 | wnd

Posted on 08/19/2010 7:00:21 PM PDT by tutstar

Conservative superstar Ann Coulter today was dropped as a keynote speaker for WND's "Taking America Back National Conference" next month because of her plan to address an event titled "HOMOCON" sponsored by the homosexual Republican group GOProud that promotes same-sex marriage and military service for open homosexuals.

Joseph Farah, editor and chief executive officer of WND, said the decision was a gut-wrenching one for his team because of their fondness for Coulter as both a person and writer-speaker.

"Ultimately, as a matter of principle, it would not make sense for us to have Ann speak to a conference about 'taking America back' when she clearly does not recognize that the ideals to be espoused there simply do not include the radical and very 'unconservative' agenda represented by GOProud," said Farah. "The drift of theconservative movement to a brand of materialistic libertarianism is one of the main reasons we planned this conference from the beginning."

Asked by Farah why she was speaking to GOProud, Coulter said: "They hired me to give a speech, so I'm giving a speech. I do it all the time."

(Excerpt) Read more at wnd.com ...


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Culture/Society; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: anncoulter; annthemancoulter; coulter; farah; homesexual; homocon; homosexualagenda
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100101-115 last
To: tutstar

Ann is now on the other side. She is welcome any time.


101 posted on 08/20/2010 11:43:32 AM PDT by bmwcyle (It is Satan's fault)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ol' Sparky
"It's time FR terminated your membership...”
I guess I'm lucky it is not up to you.
You sound like a Obama troll, planting posts on FR so the Obama MSMerde can copy them and report them in the MSM in order to show the country how the Conservative wackos “think”.
If you don't like what the school boards do, vote them out; and if that is not possible,transfer your kids to another school that reflects your views and; if that is not possible, home school them.
That is what Conservatives do, the Obamanations call people names. Living in a Republic has certain drawbacks like majority rules and the winners, by and large, get to run the government.
The Supreme Court will be reversing 9th Circuit decision that overruled Prop 8, they also will be overruling the judge who said what Fred Philips does to the family of fallen servicemen and women falls under the First Amendment.
102 posted on 08/20/2010 12:27:05 PM PDT by BilLies (no)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 95 | View Replies]

To: FelixFelicis

Someone who thinks the homosexual agenda is not a danger to freedom of speech, religion and association either isn’t paying attention and sorely ill-informed, or has moral blinders on.


103 posted on 08/20/2010 12:33:59 PM PDT by little jeremiah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 81 | View Replies]

To: Peter Libra

Thanks for the info.


104 posted on 08/20/2010 12:36:55 PM PDT by little jeremiah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 97 | View Replies]

To: BilLies

The only trolls here are pro-homosexual morons like you that refuse to acknowledge the threat the homosexual agenda is to liberty in this nation.


105 posted on 08/20/2010 12:45:17 PM PDT by Ol' Sparky (Liberal Republicans are the greater of two evils)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 102 | View Replies]

To: BilLies
If you don't like what the school boards do, vote them out

So, let's get this right. You have no problem with homosexuality being forced upon kids without their parents consent, all while we live in a country where prayer is against the law and religious freedom is curtailed in public schools?

Public schools in a free nation should never be forcing their twisted morality upon students whose parents object. That is what occurs in communist and totalitarian nations.

I'm not surprised, though, a closet leftist like you doesn't have a problem with all that.

106 posted on 08/20/2010 12:56:06 PM PDT by Ol' Sparky (Liberal Republicans are the greater of two evils)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 102 | View Replies]

To: tutstar
My post #97 somewhat hasty needs a little clarification. The elite "public schools" which were not very public, were later said to be hotbeds of homosexual activity. The confinement of males and no females, could have brought some of this on.

George Orwell and others conceded that certain of these acts were understood by parents and educators and brushed aside with euphemisms. When the WW2 started, many of the elite got into the secret services and the British Foreign Office. Ripe for blackmail and extortion. Wicked traitors sending people to their doom.

In this way, the homosexuals created a myth of many of those types who were pilot officers being homosexual. They seem to also take historical figures, now long gone, and ascribe homosexuality to them. In Canada, some of the more militant homosexuals have enforced laws and destroyed peoples businesses. Caused grief to persons who would not "marry" them. Even having others step in and make the offer. A cruel streak resides in some of them.

107 posted on 08/20/2010 3:03:09 PM PDT by Peter Libra
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 97 | View Replies]

To: tutstar

I get a laugh out of the perverted homosexuals when they chant people must accept their perversion. The recent prison escape in AZ involved two people that were lovers. Also they were cousins. The homos are having a ball playing this up. Yet the perverted homos overlook the fact that these two are consenting adults, and doing it behind closed doors. Does that chant sound familiar? It should it is the shame chant the perverted homosexuals have used for decades to defend their perverted lifestyle choice.


108 posted on 08/20/2010 6:32:58 PM PDT by DMG2FUN
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: noinfringers3
I have seen many times where the power/authority to set the language is the beginning of societal control.

Indeed. And it's disheartening to watch even those who were supposed to remain steadfast fall one by one. It's amazing how easily and quickly people are misled.

109 posted on 08/20/2010 7:49:58 PM PDT by Tired of Taxes
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 100 | View Replies]

To: DJ MacWoW
Judge Walker did fairly well at discounting voters

Temporarily. The Supreme Court will overturn his ruling if it gets that far. If not, then there will be real problems....

110 posted on 08/20/2010 9:50:36 PM PDT by freebilly (No wonder the left has a boner for Obama. There's CIALIS in soCIALISt....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 94 | View Replies]

To: Tired of Taxes
It’s about special privileges... being granted to a group of people, just because they engage in deviant behavior

Please....

111 posted on 08/20/2010 9:54:01 PM PDT by freebilly (No wonder the left has a boner for Obama. There's CIALIS in soCIALISt....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 96 | View Replies]

To: DJ MacWoW
You have grandchildren? You might want to watch who is teaching them and what they are learning

I teach my kids and grandkids to stay away from people with agendas....

112 posted on 08/20/2010 9:56:00 PM PDT by freebilly (No wonder the left has a boner for Obama. There's CIALIS in soCIALISt....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 94 | View Replies]

To: freebilly

There are real problems now.


113 posted on 08/21/2010 4:45:14 AM PDT by DJ MacWoW (If Bam is the answer, the question was stupid.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 110 | View Replies]

To: freebilly
I teach my kids and grandkids to stay away from people with agendas....

Everyone has agendas. The question is what are they.

114 posted on 08/21/2010 4:50:13 AM PDT by DJ MacWoW (If Bam is the answer, the question was stupid.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 112 | View Replies]

To: freebilly

That’s the reality, whether you want to see it or not.

Take my state as an example: First, our state offered domestic partnerships to same-sex couples as well as older opposite-sex couples. But, activists sued to force the state to either change marriage law or offer civil unions as an option to give “gay” couples the same “rights” as a married man and woman. (I put “rights” in quotations because that is their wording, not mine.)

A Republican lawmaker presented a bill that would give those “rights” to domestic partnerships and also open domestic partnerships to any two people, except an unrelated man and woman, with no questions asked. But, the activists fought that bill, and the state decided to go with civil unions.

In other words, two people are entitled to the same “rights” as a married couple if and only if they are a same-sex couple engaging in sodomy. Now, I can understand the state staying out of the private business of consenting adults. Not awarding them special “rights” for engaging in that behavior.


115 posted on 08/21/2010 6:35:15 PM PDT by Tired of Taxes
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 111 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100101-115 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson