Skip to comments.
Single White Females looking for Mr. Moneybags
ATLAH Media Network ^
| Aug 5, 2010
| michael master
Posted on 08/05/2010 11:16:11 AM PDT by bronkburnett
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-76 next last
To: bronkburnett
Democrats are presenting the government as the care taker of single women and their families as the replacement for husbands. Well, making men useless worked for the black community... right? /s
21
posted on
08/05/2010 11:36:07 AM PDT
by
GOPJ
(Asked for ZIP? Give 82224 - Lost Springs,Wy - most sparsely populated in country. Freeper:SamAdams)
To: bronkburnett
See. It’s not about females voting. It’s only about “single” females. Married women know better. *ducks*
To: EggsAckley
"I have an acquaintance, white female pushing sixty, who voted for him because he was so handsome. Arrgggghh."
Dementia AND failing eyesight. How sad. ; )
23
posted on
08/05/2010 11:38:40 AM PDT
by
LucyJo
To: nhoward14
That’s great! We need more women to get behind that movement!
24
posted on
08/05/2010 11:38:41 AM PDT
by
Jack Hydrazine
(It's the end of the world as we know it and I feel fine!)
To: bronkburnett
And why were single white women so different than white married women or than white men? Because they're living in a world the way they'd like it to be as opposed to the rest of us who live in the world that actually exists.
25
posted on
08/05/2010 11:39:07 AM PDT
by
edpc
(Those Lefties just ain't right)
To: bronkburnett
Well, count “me” out of those 70%.
I’m a single, white woman and I’m sure not looking for Mr. Moneybag!
26
posted on
08/05/2010 11:43:14 AM PDT
by
ANKE69
(German Conservative and proud of it!!!)
To: bronkburnett; All
"It is obvious that the Democrats want women to be dependent on government. Democrats have turned women into their dependent slaves."
27
posted on
08/05/2010 11:43:35 AM PDT
by
musicman
(Until I see the REAL Long Form Vault BC, he's just "PRES__ENT" Obama = Without "ID")
To: MrB
I would have NO problem giving up my vote if it meant the feminazis didn’t get one. I know I would be represented through my husband.
To: Jack Hydrazine
The woman’s movement is best viewed from behind.
29
posted on
08/05/2010 11:48:02 AM PDT
by
Second Amendment First
("Stripping motivated people of their dignity and rubbing their noses in it is a very bad idea.")
To: nhoward14
Lol and I didn’t even have to click the link!
To: nhoward14
incredible. simply incredible.
these are products of our education system.
To: Retired Greyhound
Re: “They fell for the long-legged Mack Daddy.”
Wallace-Wells mentions in Rolling Stone:
There is an amazingly candid moment in Obamas autobiography when he writes of his childhood discomfort at the way his mother would sexualize African-American men. “More than once,” he recalls, “my mother would point out Harry Belafonte is the best-looking man on the planet.” What the focus groups his advisers conducted revealed was that Obamas political career now depends, in some measure, upon a tamer version of this same feeling, on the complicated dynamics of how white women respond to a charismatic black man.
Early in his run for the U.S. Senate in 2004, Obamas pollsters discovered that women loved him, especially nice white ladies who like personalities more than politics and definitely dont like political arguments.
32
posted on
08/05/2010 11:55:40 AM PDT
by
Beckwith
(A "natural born citizen" -- two American citizen parents and born in the USA.)
To: nasube
Women gave up a LOT when they decided to reject the biblical model of male headship.
This article points out that this is the way women are made by their Creator - to expect to be provided for and protected, first by their father and then by their husband.
The man was intended to be the representative of the family to the outside world. Of course, that only lasted a couple of chapters before becoming corrupted.
33
posted on
08/05/2010 11:58:30 AM PDT
by
MrB
(The difference between a (de)humanist and a Satanist is that the latter knows who he's working for.)
To: RJS1950
The actual gender gap for the 1960 election was only 2%. Many women voted for Nixon-heck, more women than men, percentagewise voted for Ike in 1952 and 1956.
Kind of different than what the media tells us-just like Nixon won most of the under 30 vote in 1968 and 1972
34
posted on
08/05/2010 11:59:28 AM PDT
by
nasube
(Bazinga!)
To: bronkburnett
This author points out some very important facts Aren't you the author?
35
posted on
08/05/2010 12:04:57 PM PDT
by
Pan_Yan
To: MrB
Ann Coulter has said that she’d give up her vote if all other women had to give up theirs and then nothing but conservatives would win from now on. I’m inclined to agree.
36
posted on
08/05/2010 12:05:23 PM PDT
by
Nea Wood
(Silly liberal . . . paychecks are for workers!)
To: Petruchio; Yorlik803; ryan71; boxerblues; Hammy; Phinanceguy; DollyCali; DaveLoneRanger; ...
PING!
37
posted on
08/05/2010 12:07:03 PM PDT
by
RandallFlagg
(30-year smoker, E-Cigs helped me quit, and O wants me back smoking again?)
To: bronkburnett
“So Democrats are presenting the government as the care taker of single women and their families as the replacement for husbands.”
I’ll take the symbolism a step further - the “hubby” is certainly “consumating” those in such an unholy union. Come to think of it, we’re all getting screwed.
38
posted on
08/05/2010 12:14:39 PM PDT
by
TexasRepublic
(Socialism is the gospel of envy and the religion of thieves)
To: MrB
Repeal the 19th! (duck)Or only allow married people to vote. (Ducking right behind you)
39
posted on
08/05/2010 12:18:16 PM PDT
by
dfwgator
To: bronkburnett
And why were single white women so different than white married women or than white men?
In my experience SWW (single white women) under the age of 25 are some of the most naive and foolish creatures walking the face of the earth. They are as detached from reality as it's possible to get. And they are some of the worst decision makers around. It's amazing so many survive. And the more affluent the family, the worse it gets. Now my experience is with urban, educated, and semi-affluent women. I can't speak for the SWW on a Montana Ranch or the like. These women are probably grounded in reality.
I don't know the reason for this. In theory if they are better educated, they should be brighter. Maybe because they are sheltered. Maybe they are more susceptible to the influence of the general culture. This is a good topic for a Sociologist.
40
posted on
08/05/2010 12:32:10 PM PDT
by
truthguy
(Good intentions are not enough.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-76 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson