Posted on 08/03/2010 9:54:31 AM PDT by 2ndDivisionVet
The New York City Landmarks Preservation Commission "responsible for identifying and designating the City's landmarks and the buildings in the City's historic districts" has decided not to assign landmark status to a building on Park Place, two blocks north of Ground Zero.
After the board's unanimous vote, its chairman, Robert B. Tierney, said the structure, which previously home to a Burlington Coat Factory, "does not rise to the level of an individual landmark."
Having surmounted the hurdle, a developer is now free to change or demolish the 152-year-old structure, clearing the way for the construction of a controversial $100 million, 13-story Islamic community center, which would include a mosque.
Last week, the Anti-Defamation League (ADL) joined a loud chorus of opposition to such a facility near Ground Zero, whose ranks include Sarah Palin and several other politicians and activists.
"Some legitimate questions have been raised about who is providing the funding to build it, and what connections, if any, its leaders might have with groups whose ideologies stand in contradiction to our shared values," the ADL said in a statement.
Ultimately, this is not a question of rights, but a question of what is right. In our judgment, building an Islamic center in the shadow of the World Trade Center will cause some victims more pain unnecessarily, and that is not right.
Many critics of the community center, which is also known as the Cordoba House and Park51, say that there is no reason it needs to be built so close to Ground Zero.
The Wall Street Journal published a letter to Imam Feisal Abdul Rauf, the man charged with planning the community center, from Dan Senor an adjunct senior fellow at the Council on Foreign Relations and a resident of Lower Manhattan, previously a senior adviser to the Coalition Provisional Authority in Iraq.
"While we continue to stand with you and your right to proceed with this project, we see no reason why it must necessarily be located so close to the site of the Sept. 11, 2001 terrorist attacks," he wrote. "Those attacks, as you well know, were committed in the name of Islam."
We applaud and thank every Muslim throughout the world who has rejected and denounced this association. But the fact remains that in the minds of many who are swayed by the most radical interpretations of Islam, the Cordoba House will not be seen as a center for peace and reconciliation. It will rather be celebrated as a Muslim monument erected on the site of a great Muslim "military" victory a milestone on the path of the further spread of Islam throughout the world.
According to The New York Times, today's meeting "was free of much of the vitriol that had marked previous hearings."
One by one, members of the commission debated the aesthetic significance of the building, designed in the Italian Renaissance Palazzo style by an unknown architect.
Before the hearing, Elisabeth de Bourbon, a spokeswoman for the Landmarks Preservation Commission, said that, "what we're looking at is whether the building has the architectural and historic significance to the city of New York to merit landmark designation." In other words, its members were not asked to consider the planned use of the structure or site.
and George junior and senior kiss Saudi @$$ at the drop of a hat.
after 9/11 both Saudi and Egypt should have been turned to glass for their part in the attack....but the one world RINOs would have none of that......
MUSLIMS BUILD MOSQUES AT THE SITE OF THEIR VICTORIES. They’re LAUGHING at our stupidity.
good thing it wasn’t a building to house boyscouts, or it would have been held up in litigation for 50 years.
White House: No bow to Saudi (Politico ^ | April 8, 2009 | Ben Smith)
"It wasn't a bow. He grasped his hand with two hands, and he's taller than King Abdullah," said an Obama aide, who spoke on the condition of anonymity.
But it would be interesting to see what that number is.
Bronx? I can understand.
Brooklyn, also.
Upper West Side? Yes too.
Lower Manhattan? No way in hell.
Although I find it a distasteful thing to do I can’t justify not allowing the mosque to be built.
I also see no good reason not to allow “Bubba’s World of Bacon” to open up next door on one side and “Rainbow Apparel and Appliances” to open up on the other side.....especially after they spend $150 Million or whatever to build the thing.
How about the “Museum of Islamic Atrocities”?
New York has pigeons, right? Lots of them.
I’m sure those poor pigeons outside of this new mosque would appreciate some nice people feeding them lots of tasty bacon bits, which their tiny little stomachs can thus digest, and their intestinal tract then excrete said bacon bits upon the grounds and rooftop of this wonderful expression of ‘tolerance’.
There you go! The whole enchalida! Bingo!
How on Earth can this group claim to want to “heal divisions” in the community, when their very first act is to thumb its nose in the face of stiff opposition???!!!
This alone tells me all I need to know.
Liberals are too dumb to figure it out, are in denial, or are looking forward to another anti-American outpost.
I agree. The government does not have the authority to prevent a private property owner from constructing a building on his own property, simply because the building will be used for a "distasteful" purpose. Particularly when that purpose is (nominally) religious. And particularly when the means used to prevent construction are as cynical as using landmark preservation status to preserve a building that no one cared about until it was going to be transformed into a mosque.
If we are going to be defenders of the Constitution and limited government, we must not allow for government excesses simply because we agree with the end result.
I also see no good reason not to allow Bubbas World of Bacon to open up next door on one side and Rainbow Apparel and Appliances to open up on the other side.....especially after they spend $150 Million or whatever to build the thing.
Again, I agree. It's worth noting that there is, in fact, a bar located right next door to the building, which (obviously) serves alcohol, but also serves a variety of pub food, including (I believe) several items that include bacon.
God save The United States.
As Conservatives we must support the Property Rights of those who own the property where the mosque will be built.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.