Judge Blocks Parts Of Arizona Immigration Law

AP via Yahoo News ^ | 28 July 2010 | JACQUES BILLEAUD and AMANDA MYERS

[edpc]

PHOENIX – A judge has blocked the most controversial sections of Arizona's new immigration law from taking effect Thursday, handing a major legal victory to opponents of the crackdown.

The law will still take effect Thursday, but without many of the provisions that angered opponents — including sections that required officers to check a person's immigration status while enforcing other laws.

[Czar]

I understand your disappointment and sadness with what has been happening to our great country. The list of depressing events is virtually endless, now coming so rapidly they can hardly be comprehended.

With so many loyal American patriots feeling as we do, it would appear the time for redress is drawing closer.

[Borax Queen]

We killed the thread.... :0)

[Borax Queen]

At least open-carry’s going into effect at midnight.... *sigh*

[onyx]

Thank you for the information.

[patriot preacher]

See #429 Preacher. And don’t assign ‘hate’ to someone without proof. As Christians, we are supposed to hate the sin, but love the sinner. For an alleged pastor, you seem eager to sling that ‘hate’ word around.

Think about it.
________________

(1) Seems we (FReepers)may have had this argument before on other threads — that were similarly NOT about Palin until Palin-haters turned them into Palin-hating threads

(2) “Hate” is a strong word — and the only one that seems to fit those who have a knee-jerk, projectile-vomit response to the lovely lady from Wasilla. They drink the kool-aid and when the anti-Palin heaves hit, the bile of hatred flies! They can’t help it. It’s akin to “Bush hatred,” or maybe even to anti-semitism or racism...

(3) As a Preacher of the Gospel, usually I’m on the receiving end of accusuations of “hatred,” so it’s SAD when I have to point out how VILE the sin of hatred is to people who claim to be fellow travellers in the ranks of Conservatism. But because I “love the sinner,” I DO point it out.

(4) As I’ve said before, I don’t AGREE with Sarah supporting McCain — but I understand WHY she did it. WIthout McCain she wouldn’t have a national stage from which to speak. She was his VP running mate. Her decision was “political payback.” I didn’t agree with her, I don’t LIKE or SUPPORT John McCain — but it’s part of the game at that level. I wouldn’t play the game. She did in this case. Her call. I don’t have to LIKE every decision she made. END OF STORY.

(5) CAN WE NOW FIGHT THE ENEMY? The REAL ENEMY? Those on the LEFT? Those in WASHINGTON DC? Those behind flooding our borders? Judges? Bureaucrats? Please? Or do you just want to single out more Conservatives you don’t quite agree with 5% of the time and beat us up — and do Obama’s thugs job for them?

[ducttape45]

Do what I did, just disconnect cable all together. After a rough 1st week, it’s probably the rest decision I ever made.

[Art in Idaho]

The list of depressing events is virtually endless, now coming so rapidly they can hardly be comprehended.

Something every day. . .

[Borax Queen]

Good idea, thanks.

[dragnet2]

I wish there was a unapologetic conservative news network out there. Fox is not conservative enough and I’ve had it with the likes of Shepherd Smith, Megyn Kelly and the like.

I feel enlightened....Ya see we gave up on all those television talk show lying BS years ago...It's all the same shtick, BS....It's all orchestrated lies and totally controlled.

[goldendays]

Susan Bolton is a federal judge for the United States District Court for the District of Arizona. She joined the court in 2000 after being nominated by President Bill Clinton.

[workerbee]

THE FIRST TIME ONE DIRTY NUKE CROSSES THE MEXICAN BORDER...THE BORDER WILL BE SHUT DOWN IN 24 HOURS AND ORDERS WILL BE SHOOT TO KILL!

Ya think? I say, Barbra Striesand.

Never, ever underestimate the stupidity of too many who vote, and the power of a propaganda machine (a.k.a. the MSM). Never, ever forget that it was a mere seven years after we watched our fellow Americans jumping from burning skyscrapers, that this stupidity combined with the propaganda machine, sent a foreigner and an enemy sympathizer to preside in our Oval Office.

We used to say Bill Clinton could've been filmed raping Juanita Brodderick on the Capitol steps, and he still wouldn't have been removed from office. We are now to the point where Muslims (or Mexicans, take your pick) could piss on and paint over the Statue of Liberty and then nuke all of NYC, and we'd probably invite them to a beer summit to show, hey, no hard feelings. See how Unracist we are?

[Recovering Ex-hippie]

you make excellant points...perhaps I am naive. I take into consideration what you have said..and Yes, it needed to be posted!
thanks for responding.

[Art in Idaho]

Won't be long now until they push Amnesty.

Amnesty: The Line in the Sand

[stephenjohnbanker]

Reading all of these dummies and RINOS is depressing.

[TheRobb7]

just out of curiosityL

What if Arizona cops claimed they were enforcing FEDERAL law, not the Arizona law?

(I know the two are mirror images, but what if the judge’s decision could be side-stepped by semantics like that?)

Example: Driver gets pulled over for speeding. Cop asks for DL. When one isn’t produced, cop asks for papers be stating “Sir, according to US CODE XXX section Q, I am required to ask you for your papers.”

Would that work?

[valkyry1]

Yes that is pathetic isn’t it.

[Born to Conserve]

When all gentle means have failed . . . . .

[Pikachu_Dad]

You win todays prize.

“TITLE 8 > CHAPTER 12 > SUBCHAPTER II > Part VII > § 1304
Prev | Next
§ 1304. Forms for registration and fingerprinting
...
(e) Personal possession of registration or receipt card; penalties
Every alien, eighteen years of age and over, shall at all times carry with him and have in his personal possession any certificate of alien registration or alien registration receipt card issued to him pursuant to subsection (d) of this section. Any alien who fails to comply with the provisions of this subsection shall be guilty of a misdemeanor and shall upon conviction for each offense be fined not to exceed $100 or be imprisoned not more than thirty days, or both.”

[mkjessup]

(1) Seems we (FReepers)may have had this argument before on other threads — that were similarly NOT about Palin until Palin-haters turned them into Palin-hating threads

There you go again, using that wide brush to paint anyone and everyone who doesn't bow and curtsy to Saint Sarah as a 'hater'. Give your head a shake Rev, not only are those who do not worship the former Governor from Alaska not necessarily 'haters', the former Governor has provided plenty of reason and justification NOT to support her, IF one is a logical conservative not operating on pure emotion.

(2) “Hate” is a strong word — and the only one that seems to fit those who have a knee-jerk, projectile-vomit response to the lovely lady from Wasilla. They drink the kool-aid and when the anti-Palin heaves hit, the bile of hatred flies! They can’t help it. It’s akin to “Bush hatred,” or maybe even to anti-semitism or racism...

You're a real piece of work. You reveal how you apparently worship the "lovely lady from Wasilla" and once again whip out that wide brush to not only portray those opposed to Sarah Palin as hatemongers, you suggest that they are no better than anti-Semites or racists. You ought to be working for the DNC with that kind of character assasination skills in your quiver.

(3) As a Preacher of the Gospel, usually I’m on the receiving end of accusuations of “hatred,” so it’s SAD when I have to point out how VILE the sin of hatred is to people who claim to be fellow travellers in the ranks of Conservatism. But because I “love the sinner,” I DO point it out.

Remove the beam from your own eye Rev, you are propagating the same sort of hate you accuse Sarah Palin's detractors of embracing. I see no “love the sinner” sentiment in your hypocritical blather. That dog won't hunt.

(4) As I’ve said before, I don’t AGREE with Sarah supporting McCain — but I understand WHY she did it. WIthout McCain she wouldn’t have a national stage from which to speak. She was his VP running mate. Her decision was “political payback.” I didn’t agree with her, I don’t LIKE or SUPPORT John McCain — but it’s part of the game at that level. I wouldn’t play the game. She did in this case. Her call. I don’t have to LIKE every decision she made. END OF STORY.

Stop making excuses for inexcusable behavior. Sarah Palin has done far more than just 'support' McCain, she has worked tirelessly to drag his corrupt ass across the primary finish line, and if she doesn't KNOW that McCain is a corrupt and vile liberal-progressive, she must be as dumb as a bag o' hammers. If she DOES know, than she is just as amoral and without any principles as is McCain. Don't hand me that crap about “political payback”, what Sarah Palin has done, and is doing, goes far beyond that. When she first came riding to McCain's rescue, he didn't even HAVE a challenger (J.D. Hayworth), why on Earth would she feel the need to support someone running (at that time) unopposed? IF she is as savvy a politician as her sycophants and groupies claim she is, than even in the absence of a primary challenger, she should have known that J.D. Hayworth was considering a run for the GOP nomination to unseat McCain, and at every level, Hayworth's positions are the more conservative, he is the more trustworthy, in fact his views are far more in line with what Sarah Palin claims to believe in each and every day. But Sarah Palin has manifested the behavior that you have no doubt witnessed at some point, i.e., "you don't dance with the Devil (supporting RINOs and liberals) on Saturday night, and then show up singing God's praises in church on Sunday morning as if nothing happened the night before", do you get it yet Preach?

(5) CAN WE NOW FIGHT THE ENEMY? The REAL ENEMY? Those on the LEFT? Those in WASHINGTON DC? Those behind flooding our borders? Judges? Bureaucrats? Please? Or do you just want to single out more Conservatives you don’t quite agree with 5% of the time and beat us up — and do Obama’s thugs job for them?

We can't fight the enemy when those in our own camp are working to enable those (like McCain, FioRINO, Steele, et al) who are 'reaching across the aisle' to stab America in the back, conservatives in particular.

You want to talk about KoolAid drinkers Rev? You haven't just guzzled it down, you've snorted it right out of the package!

[patriot preacher]

I never said you had to support Sarah Palin. I don’t know if she’ll run, nor if I’ll support her if she does. That’s not the point. I’ve drank no kool-aid. I just find the spite for her — and the obtuse reasoning on the part of SOME (if you’re not one of them, then you’ve wasted a LOT of time on a thread not even ABOUT Palin doing exactly this)trying to discredit and tear her down.

So, I give up. You don’t hate her. You’re not obsessed with her. You don’t take every opportunity on every thread to rip her to shreds. You’ve just spent how many post over how many hours arguing that somehow the Federal judges decision today tossing our Arizona’s enforcement of illegal immigration laws was Sarah Palin’s fault..?

Yeah — it’s not worth arguing over. Even though I support J.D. Hayworth, I DON’T support Carly Fiorina, and I’m nowhere close to a RINO, you’ve got me pegged. I like Sarah. I’m “one of THEM.”

Soon, you’ll be virtually alone with that attitude mkjessup — and that will mean we’ve ALL lost.