Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Google to Pay Homosexual Staff More than Heterosexual Employees
Life Site News ^ | July 5, 2010 | Thaddeus M. Baklinski

Posted on 07/05/2010 3:15:14 PM PDT by NYer

July 5, 2010 (LifeSiteNews.com) - A news release from Google says that the mega-search engine company will begin paying its homosexual employees more than their heterosexual counterparts.

Citing a tax law that says health insurance benefits paid to civil partners of homosexual employees are considered taxable income, while benefits provided to married spouses are not taxed, Google announced it will rectify the tax "discrimination" against homosexuals by paying them the difference.

On average an extra $1,069 per year will be given to homosexuals, according to a NY Times report.

The company said on its blog Thursday, that it will be “grossing-up imputed taxes on health insurance benefits for all same-sex domestic partners in the United States, retroactive to January 1, 2010.”

Google is well known for its endorsement of homosexuality and already has parental leave for homosexuals equivalent to the Family and Medical Leave Act; it is working with its insurers to change the definition of infertility - now defined as the inability to conceive a child after trying for one year - in order to have employee health benefits cover artificial insemination for lesbians.

It was reported that the company made the move in response to complaints from homosexual employees that they were discriminated against by the tax system.

"We said, 'You're right, that doesn't seem fair,' so we looked into it," Google Personnel chief Laszlo Bock told the New York Times. "From that initial suggestion, we said, let's take a look at all the benefits we offer and see if we are being truly fair across the board."

Daryl Herrschaft, director of the Workplace Project at Human Rights Campaign, a homosexual rights advocacy group, applauded Google's new policy.

"They're picking up the slack where the federal government hasn't recognized the reality of diversity in the workforce today," Herrschaft told the media.

"This is eliminating existing discrimination that ... gays and lesbians face in the workplace as a result of federal law that doesn’t acknowledge their families."

However, Focus on the Family spokesman Gary Schneeberger told FoxNews.com that the extra pay given to homosexuals is actually reverse discrimination and does nothing to equalize benefits to employees.

“If Google wants to be truly fair to its employees, it should consider extra compensation to married heterosexuals who are bitten every April 15 by the marriage-penalty tax,” Schneeberger said.

“How is offering more money to only one group to offset a perceived inequity not a form of discrimination against those groups not fortunate enough to receive such bonuses?”

Furthermore, Fox News legal analyst Lis Wiehl said Google's move could open the way for a reverse discrimination lawsuit against the company based on infringement of the statute of equal pay for equal work, and giving preference to benefits based on sexual orientation.

“There’s a potential for a reverse discrimination suit because of the equal pay for equal work statute which says that if I’m doing the same job as the person next to me that my marital status or sexual orientation shouldn’t be taken into consideration. It’s my work performance that should be taken into consideration,” Wiehl told FoxNews.com.


Contact info:
Eric Schmidt, Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer
Google Inc.
1600 Amphitheatre Parkway
Mountain View, CA 94043
Phone: +1 650-253-0000
Fax: +1 650-253-0001
Email: (via website)

Google Toronto
10 Dundas Street East
Suite 600
Toronto, Ontario M5B 2G9
Phone: +1 416-915-8200
Fax: +1 416-915-8201


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Culture/Society; News/Current Events; Philosophy
KEYWORDS: employment; fdrq; google; homosexual; homosexualagenda; homosexuals
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-69 next last
To: GregoTX

Dude you made me laugh big time!


21 posted on 07/05/2010 3:28:52 PM PDT by historyrepeatz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: NYer

“Google announced it will rectify the tax “discrimination” against homosexuals by paying them the difference.”

They used the word ‘rectify’ and ‘homosexual’ in the same sentence. How many of those homosexuals live on Rekdal Road on Camano Island, WA?


22 posted on 07/05/2010 3:32:46 PM PDT by Jack Hydrazine (It's the end of the world as we know it and I feel fine!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NYer

So... lets talk bottom line. If I go to work for Goo-gle, how much more money do I get if I tell em I’m a homo?

And is there a bonus for being a tranny? I mean, to be fair, that is even more expensive, what with the hormones, surgery, makeup etc.


23 posted on 07/05/2010 3:33:17 PM PDT by LegendHasIt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: aloishammer

Is this the same Lis Wiehl that believes citizens have a right to grab and push police officers?


24 posted on 07/05/2010 3:33:53 PM PDT by historyrepeatz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: NYer
Christiansearch.me seems to work... I think I saw a reference for it here on Freerepublic. I've been using it for close to 6 months and it seems to work well.
25 posted on 07/05/2010 3:34:15 PM PDT by El Cid (Believe on the Lord Jesus Christ, and thou shalt be saved, and thy house...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: NYer

gay on pay day


26 posted on 07/05/2010 3:36:41 PM PDT by clintonh8r (Heckuva job, Brownie!.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: aloishammer
Nope. No legal standing -- the amount of money the employee actually gets is the same.

Gets after paying taxes, you mean? I'm pretty sure that there's already Google employees who have begun the process of filing a lawsuit right now, both single and married employees.

27 posted on 07/05/2010 3:36:58 PM PDT by kingu (Favorite Sticker: Lost hope, and Obama took my change.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Excuse_My_Bellicosity
They justify their hatred and wishes for violence by claiming that they’ve been so downtrodden all these years, just like muslims.

Since they can't reproduce, they need the extra money to fund adoptions and IVF procedures. (/sarc)

28 posted on 07/05/2010 3:48:42 PM PDT by NYer ("God dwells in our midst, in the Blessed Sacrament of the altar." St. Maximilian Kolbe)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Neoliberalnot
All right! Since the Scroogle Scraper went off line, I've been looking for a replacement...

Thx for the heads up...

29 posted on 07/05/2010 3:51:13 PM PDT by SuperLuminal (Where is another agitator for republicanism like Sam Adams when we need him?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: NYer

That’s fine, employers should pay their employees whatever they wish.

However, I bet most people who support Google on this would NOT agree.


30 posted on 07/05/2010 3:53:01 PM PDT by Lorianne
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NYer

In the next 5 minutes I’m going to remove everything Google from my computer. Ciao


31 posted on 07/05/2010 3:56:25 PM PDT by Rappini ("Pro deo et Patria.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TruthShallSetYouFree
He was not amused.

If he is like most homosexuals of my acquaintance, isn't that is his usual state?

32 posted on 07/05/2010 3:56:36 PM PDT by magslinger (If recycling makes cents as well as sense, I am all for it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: SuperLuminal

Scroggle works just fine

http://www.scroogle.org/cgi-bin/scraper.htm


33 posted on 07/05/2010 3:56:52 PM PDT by Syncro (Troopathon 2010! www.troopathon.org!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: NYer

And the reason is?


34 posted on 07/05/2010 3:58:24 PM PDT by freekitty (Give me back my conservative vote; then find me a real conservative to vote for)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NYer
So...what about singles that get taxed more than married couples?? Isn't THAT discrimination against singles? And what about the marriage tax? Doesn't that discriminate against married couples?

THE WHOLE FRIGGIN TAX CODE NEEDS TO BE ABOLISHED! IT'S A FARGIN ABOMINATION AND WE ARE ALL SLAVES TO THIS CORRUPT GOVERNMENT UNTIL WE GET RID OF IT!!

35 posted on 07/05/2010 4:00:06 PM PDT by unixfox (Abolish Slavery, Repeal The 16th Amendment!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: LegendHasIt

If somebody is bi or only latent do they get less than a flamer?


36 posted on 07/05/2010 4:00:20 PM PDT by Hillarys Gate Cult
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: aloishammer; NYer
So suit is filed and the company can't come up with any homosexuals on the rolls.

Or, at least no one willing to PROVE IT in court.

The Moslem guys gotta be real careful whose heads they chop off Fur Shur.

37 posted on 07/05/2010 4:02:37 PM PDT by muawiyah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: NYer
A group of non-pervert google employees should be at the front steps of the nearest Federal court tomorrow morning with lawyers in tow.
38 posted on 07/05/2010 4:07:02 PM PDT by Gay State Conservative (''I don't regret setting bombs,I feel we didn't do enough.'' ->Bill Ayers,Hussein's mentor,9/11/01)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: freekitty
And the reason is?

"Citing a tax law that says health insurance benefits paid to civil partners of homosexual employees are considered taxable income, while benefits provided to married spouses are not taxed, Google announced it will rectify the tax "discrimination" against homosexuals by paying them the difference."

39 posted on 07/05/2010 4:10:53 PM PDT by Doe Eyes
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: Doe Eyes
There is no way that stands in a court of law. If the law of the state is no gay marriage, any company showing favoritism toward said group is violating the EOE statues, and thus, up for pending litigation, potentially from married couples.

The precedent is another slippery slope. If allowed to stand, employees could sue for equal protection if they're smokers, over weight, etc.

40 posted on 07/05/2010 4:13:41 PM PDT by rintense
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-69 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson