Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

850 Orthodox Rabbis Against Obama's Supreme Court Choice
Israel National News ^ | 06/28/2010 | Eli Stutz

Posted on 06/28/2010 11:19:06 PM PDT by Uncle Miltie

The Rabbinical Alliance of America, which represents 850 Orthodox Rabbis, harshly criticized U.S. President Barack Obama's nominee for the Supreme Court, Elena Kagan. Kagan, 50, is set to replace retiring Justice John Paul Stevens, 90, the court's foremost liberal.

Rabbi Yehuda Levin, speaking on behalf of the body of rabbis, issued a statement explaining their position, saying:

"Ms. Kagan is Non-Kosher - not fit to serve on the supreme court or any other court. It is clear from Ms. Kagan's record on issues such as abortion-on-demand, Partial-Birth-Abortion, the radical homosexual and lesbian agenda, the "supremacy" of the anti-family panoply over religious liberties of Biblical adherents, et. al., that she will function as a flame-throwing radical, hastening society's already steep decline into Sodom and Gommorah."

Levin told CNSNews.com that his fellow rabbis and hundreds of thousands of Orthodox Jews--are confused at the Obama's choice of Kagan.

“What exactly was Obama thinking, President Obama thinking, when he nominated Kagan? Because eventually, down the road, someone--or some group--is going to ‘take the hit’ for the crazy decisions that Kagan is bound to make. So we would have much preferred if President Obama had given this ‘distinction’ to another minority group, instead of singling out the Jews.”

"We feel that Elena Kagan turns traditional Judaism on its head--from a concept of a nation of priests and holy people, she is turning it into, ‘Let’s homosexualize every segment of society. And by the way, partial-birth babies have no right to be delivered.’"

Senator Jeff Sessions, the leading Republican on the Judiciary Committee said that Kagan can expect hard questions regarding her ability to be a Supreme Court justice.

Sessions, who appeared on Sunday on CBS's "Face the Nation" said, "She has the least experience of any nominee at least in the last 50 years."

(Excerpt) Read more at israelnationalnews.com ...


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Extended News; Government; Israel
KEYWORDS:
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-70 next last
To: Uncle Miltie

As much as I agree with the substance of what the rabbis say, I am very uncomfortable with injecting religion into politics.

(And I say this as someone who recently served on the Board of Directors of an Orthodox shul.)


21 posted on 06/29/2010 7:44:45 AM PDT by NYC GOP Chick
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ml/nj; firebrand; rmlew; dennisw; LucyT; juliej; OldFriend; SunkenCiv; Clintonfatigued; ...
Ping!!!

Please see my posts #s 17 and 18.

22 posted on 06/29/2010 8:07:03 AM PDT by justiceseeker93
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Advil000

These are the real Orthodox Rabbis. Don’t confuse them with the 80% liberal / 50% non-believer “Jews In Name Only”.


23 posted on 06/29/2010 8:18:20 AM PDT by Uncle Miltie (0bummer calls opponents "Teabaggers". So we can call Kagan "Carpet Muncher." Right?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Uncle Miltie
Be careful with these people.

The head of this organization, Rabbi Abraham Hecht, was banned from Israel for promoting the assassination of former Prime Minister Yitzhak Rabin -- he gave it a religious sanction, essentially a Jewish fatwa. Rabin was later assassinated by Yigal Amir, a man he inspired.

24 posted on 06/29/2010 8:45:25 AM PDT by Alter Kaker (Gravitation is a theory, not a fact. It should be approached with an open mind...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jewbacca

Question:

Is it possible for a “secular” Jew to be anti-semitic when he treats observant Jews with contempt?

Just asking. (Thanks)


25 posted on 06/29/2010 9:10:14 AM PDT by ripley
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: ripley

I suppose it depends on how one is defining “anti-semetic”

I would defer to a native English speaker like yourself.


26 posted on 06/29/2010 9:26:20 AM PDT by Jewbacca (The residents of Iroquois territory may not determine whether Jews may live in Jerusalem.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: Jewbacca
You've never seen contempt until you see how secular Jewish people treat observant Jewish people.

Yes, there are some problems along these lines, and you are OK to point it out, but you overgeneralize and exaggerate the magnitude of it.

27 posted on 06/29/2010 9:31:04 AM PDT by justiceseeker93
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: Jewbacca

Thanks for your reply.


28 posted on 06/29/2010 9:43:56 AM PDT by ripley
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: NYC GOP Chick
...I am very uncomfortable with injecting religion into politics.

No matter what the left of today will have you believe, religion has been "injected" into politics in the United States since the founding of the Republic. There are many ways in which this has played out over the years, and most of these have been non-threatening to religious freedom as a whole.

In this case, clergy advocating a mainstream political or legal position based on their religious principles is very much consistent with the historical tradition of American politics.

29 posted on 06/29/2010 9:48:54 AM PDT by justiceseeker93
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: NYC GOP Chick

“I am very uncomfortable with injecting religion into politics.”

A common defense mechanism, bred into us in ghettos.

Keep your head down. Don’t bring attention to yourself.

And also why the JINOS are the face of Judaism in America.


30 posted on 06/29/2010 9:56:54 AM PDT by Jewbacca (The residents of Iroquois territory may not determine whether Jews may live in Jerusalem.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: justiceseeker93

“but you overgeneralize and exaggerate the magnitude of it”

Take the train with my father-in-law and myself one day in New Jersey.


31 posted on 06/29/2010 9:59:02 AM PDT by Jewbacca (The residents of Iroquois territory may not determine whether Jews may live in Jerusalem.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: Uncle Miltie
Levin told CNSNews.com that his fellow rabbis and hundreds of thousands of Orthodox Jews--are confused at the Obama's choice of Kagan.

What's so confusing about the ultra-liberal Obama nominating the ultra-liberal Kagan? The only thing confusing is the rabbis' confusion.

32 posted on 06/29/2010 10:20:44 AM PDT by Mr. Mojo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Advil000; ThePatriotsFlag

You people are obviously totally ignorant about Rabbi Levin and his organization. He has been in the fight against liberal Democrats and for moral sanity for decades, even running for Congress at one point. There are, unfortunately, plenty of Orthodox Jews who are “yellow dog Democrats,” but I can guarantee you that this group isn’t among them.


33 posted on 06/29/2010 10:37:16 AM PDT by Zionist Conspirator (Lakhen 'emor, hinni noten lo 'et-beriti shalom.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: NYC GOP Chick
As much as I agree with the substance of what the rabbis say, I am very uncomfortable with injecting religion into politics.

(And I say this as someone who recently served on the Board of Directors of an Orthodox shul.)

The Seven Noachide Laws are objectively binding on the entire non-Jewish portion of the human race. Non-Jews are even required to set up courts of law to enforce them. The "separation of religion and politics" is a modern, un-Jewish concept. It's a good ideological justification for getting the goyim to let Jews live in peace, but unfortunately in the past two hundred years many Jews seem to have gotten the mistaken idea that it's actually part of Judaism rather than a purely utilitarian position.

About three hundred years ago all Jews lived as a self-governing Theocratic community under the civil authority of the rabbinate. With moslems spreading sharia around, perhaps Jews should give some thought to returning to that polity.

34 posted on 06/29/2010 10:46:59 AM PDT by Zionist Conspirator (Lakhen 'emor, hinni noten lo 'et-beriti shalom.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Alter Kaker
Be careful with these people.

The head of this organization, Rabbi Abraham Hecht, was banned from Israel for promoting the assassination of former Prime Minister Yitzhak Rabin -- he gave it a religious sanction, essentially a Jewish fatwa. Rabin was later assassinated by Yigal Amir, a man he inspired.

You're way, way, way out of line. This group is Charedi, not Zionist. Also, so far as I know there is no connection between Rabbi Levin and Rabbi Hecht.

35 posted on 06/29/2010 10:58:38 AM PDT by Zionist Conspirator (Lakhen 'emor, hinni noten lo 'et-beriti shalom.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: Mr. Mojo
The only thing confusing is the rabbis' confusion.

Yes, I would agree that "confused" is the wrong choice of word there. A word like "appalled" might be more appropriate.

36 posted on 06/29/2010 11:18:22 AM PDT by justiceseeker93
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: Jewbacca

I don’t like it when Christians try to do it and that was one of my many criticisms of Huckabee’s candidacy in ‘08. And I sure as hell am against the creeping insinuation of Islam into our society. I’d be a hypocrite if I thought it OK when Jews do it.

But thanks *so much* for the insult. As a member of an Orthodox shul who attends services every week (not to mention holidays), yeah, I’m *such* a JINO. I see that you’re a student of Dale Carnegie and “How To Win Friends And Influence People.”

You used to be one of the people here I liked. I won’t make that mistake again.


37 posted on 06/29/2010 11:59:54 AM PDT by NYC GOP Chick
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: Zionist Conspirator
The Seven Noachide Laws are objectively binding on the entire non-Jewish portion of the human race. Non-Jews are even required to set up courts of law to enforce them. The "separation of religion and politics" is a modern, un-Jewish concept. It's a good ideological justification for getting the goyim to let Jews live in peace, but unfortunately in the past two hundred years many Jews seem to have gotten the mistaken idea that it's actually part of Judaism rather than a purely utilitarian position.

About three hundred years ago all Jews lived as a self-governing Theocratic community under the civil authority of the rabbinate. With moslems spreading sharia around, perhaps Jews should give some thought to returning to that polity.


We don't live in a theocracy. If the separation of religion and politics is too much of a problem for anyone, then perhaps he or she would be more comfortable in a theocratic society.

I assume that most non-Jews have as much interest in living under Halakha as I do in living under the religious laws of any other religion.

38 posted on 06/29/2010 12:07:34 PM PDT by NYC GOP Chick
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: Zionist Conspirator
You're way, way, way out of line. This group is Charedi, not Zionist. Also, so far as I know there is no connection between Rabbi Levin and Rabbi Hecht.

The article is about the Rabbinical Alliance of America. According to the organization's website Rabbi Hecht is the President of that organization. Rabbi Levin is its spokesperson.

Anybody who promulgates official statements from the Igud Horabbonim should be aware of the history of its President -- a man who issued what was in effect a Jewish fatwa that sanctioned the assassination of Prime Minister Rabin.

In my book, that's terrorism -- and Israel agrees with me, which is why Hecht is banned from ever entering that country.

39 posted on 06/29/2010 12:18:46 PM PDT by Alter Kaker (Gravitation is a theory, not a fact. It should be approached with an open mind...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: NYC GOP Chick

“But thanks *so much* for the insult.”

I am very sorry and apologize for insulting you. It was not intentional. My English is, well, Israeli and very, well, direct.

I did not mean to call you a JINO.

What I meant to say was that I believe that observant Jewish people (such as yourself) need to seize the public face of Judaism away from JINOS.

And by which I mean, be active politically -— and not just for “Jewish” causes -— but moral, economic, abortion, etc.

Again, I am sorry.


40 posted on 06/29/2010 12:24:14 PM PDT by Jewbacca (The residents of Iroquois territory may not determine whether Jews may live in Jerusalem.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-70 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson