Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

House Passes DISCLOSE Act
NRO ^ | Daniel Foster

Posted on 06/24/2010 1:46:50 PM PDT by OldDeckHand

The House just passed the DISCLOSE Act, by a vote of 219-206. As with so much in this Congress, the only thing bipartisan about the bill was the opposition to it.

(Excerpt) Read more at corner.nationalreview.com ...


TOPICS: Breaking News; Constitution/Conservatism; Front Page News; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: bhotyranny; campaign; disclose; discloseact; elections; finance; freespeech; liberalfascism; lping; obama; palin; tyranny
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-89 next last
To: Faith

Thank you for posting that for me.

[how depressing].....:-[


41 posted on 06/24/2010 2:52:20 PM PDT by Salamander (What'd I do? [I did what the voices told me to] What'd I do?....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: LowTaxesEqualProsperity

Both H.R. 5175, and its Senate companion legislation, both contain a “severability clause” that will keep parts of the bill alive, if the U.S. Supreme Court strikes down any section of the bill.


42 posted on 06/24/2010 2:52:32 PM PDT by Doogle (USAF.68-73..8th TFW Ubon Thailand..never store a threat you should have eliminated)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: LowTaxesEqualProsperity; C19fan; livius; All
The NRA posted a news release today on it and this is all they had to say:
STATEMENT ON DISCLOSE ACT PASSING THE U.S. HOUSE

Thursday, June 24, 2010

The NRA’s sworn duty is to protect the Second Amendment above all else. We face attacks daily from the White House, Congress, state legislatures, city councils, courts, the United Nations, multi-billion dollar media conglomerates and billionaires like Michael Bloomberg and George Soros. Make no mistake; if our political voice is silenced, they will destroy the Second Amendment.

We refused to let that happen. We will continue to fight to protect the Second Amendment against all attacks – direct or otherwise. And we will never back down from that commitment.

-NRA-
NRA-website

To save themselves today, without a fight, they give all power to those who will destroy them tomorrow. Like sheep to the slaughter.

43 posted on 06/24/2010 2:55:25 PM PDT by drpix
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: OldDeckHand

Damn the NRA-ILA to HELL. Bastards. Tearing up my card, and will never send them another red cents.


44 posted on 06/24/2010 3:08:37 PM PDT by montag813 (http://www.StandWithArizona.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: OldDeckHand

Damn the NRA-ILA to HELL. Bastards. Tearing up my card, and will never send them another red cent.


45 posted on 06/24/2010 3:08:47 PM PDT by montag813 (http://www.StandWithArizona.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: OldDeckHand

Levin is discussing this right now.


46 posted on 06/24/2010 3:11:00 PM PDT by kara2008
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: OldDeckHand
First option 1. Write your Senators.
2. Massive non-compliance and civil disobedience.. Create new groups purposely to circumvent this.

The second option is a declaration that the government now lacks any semblence of legitimacy and it is our duty to take up arms. I am not a fan of this one.

47 posted on 06/24/2010 3:11:12 PM PDT by rmlew (There is no such thing as a Blue Dog Democrat; just a liberals who lies.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: drpix
Make no mistake; if our political voice is silenced, they will destroy the Second Amendment.

What idiots! If the NRA has simply come out guns blazing against this bill, it would have FAILED!!! They sold out their members and the American people. Absolutely bastard traitors.

48 posted on 06/24/2010 3:11:26 PM PDT by montag813 (http://www.StandWithArizona.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: OldDeckHand

I am not advocating this, but how much more of this shit can we take, until there’s armed uprising (again,I’m not advocating it, but my GOD how much more can we take)???


49 posted on 06/24/2010 3:16:36 PM PDT by Marathoner (And we thought Carter sucked.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: OldDeckHand
"It was pulled from the floor by Pelosi late last week. It reemerged"

This is becoming a common tactic of the SeaHag.

50 posted on 06/24/2010 3:18:36 PM PDT by Drill Thrawl (Rahm and his knife at Doe's)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: Marathoner
"...but how much more of this shit can we take, until there’s armed uprising..."

I believe that is the precise idea my FRiend.

51 posted on 06/24/2010 3:21:38 PM PDT by Drill Thrawl (Rahm and George at Doe's when the knife came down)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: OldDeckHand
TRAITORS TO THE CONSTITUTION AND YOUR "SWORN OATH OF OFFICE"..."BURN IN HELL!"
52 posted on 06/24/2010 3:22:13 PM PDT by houeto (Get drinking water from your ditch - http://www.junglebucket.com/Jungle-Bucket-1.htm)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: LowTaxesEqualProsperity

“F the NRA.

If they don’t care about the 1st Amendment, I’m not going to fund them anymore on teh 2nd Amendment. Sellouts.”

If the don’t care about the First, what’s the point of the Second? Agreed.


53 posted on 06/24/2010 3:22:50 PM PDT by PIF (They came for me and mine .. now it is your turn..)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: drpix
''To save themselves today, without a fight, they give all power to those who will destroy them tomorrow. "

Clearly, the NRA wasn't paying attention during the so-called health care debate. Bart Stupak, a guy who the NRA thinks is a principled advocate for the 2nd Amendment, was also allegedly a principled advocate for life. Of course, when the chips were down, Stupak proved himself to be just another leftist, trading the lives of the unborn for the favor of his liberal masters.

The NRA thinks with the enactment of this bill, that they will be able to continue to lobby to elect politicians - Democrat or Republican - who champion the 2nd Amendment, when in fact they're only going to be able to elect democrats who will sell them out the moment their support becomes politically inconvenient, or necessary.

54 posted on 06/24/2010 3:23:11 PM PDT by OldDeckHand
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: OldDeckHand

“This bill isn’t about high constitutional principles. It isn’t about protecting the freedom of the American people. And it isn’t about creating private-sector jobs or cutting the deficit.”

Yup - that pret’ much describes the entire RAT party right there.


55 posted on 06/24/2010 3:28:28 PM PDT by SeattleBruce (God, Family, Church, Country - 11/2010, 11/2012 - Tea Party like it's 1773 & pray 2 Chronicles 7:14!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: OldDeckHand

“The House just passed the DISCLOSE Act, by a vote of 219-206...”

Hate to ask - did any pubbies vote for this?


56 posted on 06/24/2010 3:29:58 PM PDT by SeattleBruce (God, Family, Church, Country - 11/2010, 11/2012 - Tea Party like it's 1773 & pray 2 Chronicles 7:14!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeattleBruce
"Hate to ask - did any pubbies vote for this?"

Two - Cao, LA and Castle, DE.

57 posted on 06/24/2010 3:34:41 PM PDT by OldDeckHand
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies]

To: OldDeckHand

Act of war.


58 posted on 06/24/2010 3:56:15 PM PDT by dr_who
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: pennboricua

I’m not holding my breath. Are you that sure?


59 posted on 06/24/2010 4:13:10 PM PDT by tutstar (Baptist Ping List-freepmail me to be included or removed. <{{{><)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: OldDeckHand

IMHO you can’t partial out 1st Amendment rights to different organizations, based on their size and other qualifications and at the same time disqualify others because of size and other criteria. Everyone needs to be treated the same whether one person or a million persons.

IMHO the Supreme Court will fast track this law if it passed and then rule against it. It is a direct assault by the dimoKKKRATS on their previous ruling. I don’t think this will sit to well with them.


60 posted on 06/24/2010 4:35:22 PM PDT by Parley Baer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-89 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson