Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61 next last
To: reaganaut1
BWAHAHAHAHAHA
Oh this is too rich.. Remember the General Betray Us- put out by Obamas boss, George Soros and moveon.org.....well Obama just hired him for Afghanistan!
Bwahahahahaha
2 posted on
06/23/2010 10:33:08 AM PDT by
Freddd
(CNN is down to Three Hundred Thousand viewers. But they worked for it.)
To: reaganaut1
Thank God George W. Bush won the war in Iraq or this thing will seriously be imploding under the lack of leadership that this administration displays.
3 posted on
06/23/2010 10:33:11 AM PDT by
Typical_Whitey
(Our nation has a choice, Vote or Die.)
To: reaganaut1
I would not be entirely surprised if Petraeus were our next president. Stranger things have happened.
4 posted on
06/23/2010 10:33:21 AM PDT by
cvq3842
To: reaganaut1
Thank God George W. Bush won the war in Iraq or this thing will seriously be imploding under the lack of leadership that this administration displays.
5 posted on
06/23/2010 10:33:24 AM PDT by
Typical_Whitey
(Our nation has a choice, Vote or Die.)
To: reaganaut1
Now that’s going to strengthen his far-left wacko support.
6 posted on
06/23/2010 10:34:05 AM PDT by
Pilgrim's Progress
(http://www.baptistbiblebelievers.com/BYTOPICS/tabid/335/Default.aspx)
To: reaganaut1
7 posted on
06/23/2010 10:34:12 AM PDT by
roaddog727
(It's the Constitution, Stupid!)
To: reaganaut1
His Majesty missed a golden opportunity to prove that our war effort is more important than his ego. Rather, he has reinforced his stereotype as a thin-skinned, vain autocrat.
8 posted on
06/23/2010 10:34:23 AM PDT by
americanophile
(November can't come fast enough....)
To: reaganaut1
Petraeus should just resign. Let Obama name some lesbian “general” to the job instead, if the ROE aren’t going to change.
10 posted on
06/23/2010 10:34:52 AM PDT by
montag813
(http://www.StandWithArizona.com)
To: reaganaut1
He owns it, now.
No more blaming Bush.
13 posted on
06/23/2010 10:36:06 AM PDT by
E. Pluribus Unum
("The only stable state is the one in which all men are equal before the law." -- Aristotle)
To: reaganaut1
Blame your predecessor
Blame your second in command
Prepare three envelopes...
Except that seconds in command seem to be bailing out before they can be blamed...
18 posted on
06/23/2010 10:37:09 AM PDT by
null and void
(We are now in day 516 of our national holiday from reality. - 0bama really isn't one of US.)
To: reaganaut1
Isn’t that a non-trivial demotion for Petraeus? And how are the liberals going to feel about having the Afghan war handled by the very person Bush relied upon to oversee the detested “surge” in Iraq?
Obama seems to have a talent for jumping from the frying pan into the fire. Somehow I don’t think this decision is going to reverse his declining approval ratings.
19 posted on
06/23/2010 10:37:09 AM PDT by
DrC
To: reaganaut1
Was McCrystal simply relieved of command or has he retired from the military?
To: reaganaut1
Two demotions - one for Petraeus and one for McChrystal.
24 posted on
06/23/2010 10:38:20 AM PDT by
Zhang Fei
(Let us pray that peace be now restored to the world and that God will preserve it always)
To: reaganaut1
Gen. David Petraeus is already the Afghanistan CDR. He is the CENTCOM CINC. Something is screwy here.
29 posted on
06/23/2010 10:39:15 AM PDT by
Hillbillary
(I know how to deal with Communists, I still wear their scars on my back from Hollywood-Ronald Reagan)
To: reaganaut1
Pres’ent DUh-bama is the one who should be “RELIEVED of command”. His own party said worse of him during the campaign...he asked one of them to be his running mate and filled cabinet posts with the rest. They were all far more critical than any comments attributed to the general.
30 posted on
06/23/2010 10:39:19 AM PDT by
RasterMaster
(The only way to open a LIEberal mind is with a brick!)
To: reaganaut1
Maybe McChrystal should run for President...you know, just to further piss off the Purple-lipped peacock
31 posted on
06/23/2010 10:39:40 AM PDT by
FrankR
(Standing against tyranny must start somewhere, or the future belongs to the tyrants.)
To: reaganaut1
Who didn’t see this coming?
If the Obamanation hadn’t done this, then he’d be seen as a being unable to control the military by the left.
And that’s one of the last things he wants, is for his base - the left - to see him as ineffective and weak. Now the rest of America already knows he’s weak, but his supporters don’t yet.
33 posted on
06/23/2010 10:39:46 AM PDT by
gogogodzilla
(Live free or die!)
To: reaganaut1
Petraeus was already over the Afghanistan command at CENTCOM HQ. Its natural for HQ commander to temporarily takeover until they find another field commander. Besides, such an announced tactic will resonate with world perception. I highly doubt that Petraeus is going to be the day-to-day guy in Afghanistan for a lengthy period of time. He has able commanders that work for him. That is how things work.
34 posted on
06/23/2010 10:39:57 AM PDT by
Tulsa Ramjet
("If not now, when?" "Because it's judgment that defeats us.")
To: reaganaut1
Obamas General gets dumped, Bushs General returns.
Can Bush return as CIC too?
36 posted on
06/23/2010 10:40:03 AM PDT by
roses of sharon
(I can do all things through Him who strengthens me. Philippians 4:13)
To: reaganaut1
Don't do it General Petraeus. You will just be the fall guy for Obama. He doesn't want to win. The ROEs are designed to just keep getting Americans killed. The announced departure date will lead to scenes like the last days in Saigon as we try to get out. Petraeus will tarnish his own chances for higher office if he takes this on and Obama keeps strangling the US war effort.
37 posted on
06/23/2010 10:40:23 AM PDT by
Truth29
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61 next last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson