To: Kaslin
I think Woodrow Wilson needs to be in the running.
To: paterfamilias
—Wilson is my candidate, too—and Harding, other than a financial scandal involving people he trusted, wasn’t a bad president-—
23 posted on
06/16/2010 7:13:32 AM PDT by
rellimpank
(--don't believe anything the MSM tells you about firearms or explosives--NRA Benefactor)
To: paterfamilias
"I think Woodrow Wilson needs to be in the running." Actually, I think Wilson was hands down, the worst, but given time, Obama's got the potential to surpass him.
79 posted on
06/16/2010 7:42:11 AM PDT by
Joe 6-pack
(Que me amat, amet et canem meum)
To: paterfamilias
My top ten worst:
- James Buchanan
- BO
- Jimmy Carter
- Lyndon B. Johnson
- Ulysses S. Grant
- Franklin D. Roosevelt
- Woodrow Wilson
- Martin Van Buren
- Bill Clinton
- Franklin Pierce
Buchanan is still leading BO for one reason only: BO hasn't ushered in a civil war. Yet.
80 posted on
06/16/2010 7:44:34 AM PDT by
Vigilanteman
(Obama: Fake black man. Fake Messiah. Fake American. How many fakes can you fit in one Zer0?)
To: paterfamilias
115 posted on
06/16/2010 9:23:46 AM PDT by
Kaslin
(Acronym for OBAMA: One Big Ass Mistake America)
To: paterfamilias
Yes, right now I would say WW is the worst. But Obama has caught up quickly in a short amount of time. But Obama doesn't care what we think, anyway, so saying this won't change anything. He needs to be defeated in 2012.
To: paterfamilias
You’re right. Woodrow Wilson would definitely have to be in the running.
132 posted on
06/16/2010 1:48:24 PM PDT by
oneamericanvoice
(Support freedom! Support the troops! Surrender is not an option!)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson