Posted on 05/28/2010 2:08:35 PM PDT by i88schwartz
President Bill Clinton refuses to comment on the offer made to Rep. Joe Sestak on behalf of the White House. Clinton was asked several times, but ignored the question.
(Excerpt) Read more at realclearpolitics.com ...
Interesting.
I’m sorry I don’t recall......
You know, he’s probably taken Viagra. He might just be deaf.
For “24” fans, Clinton does a great impersonation of President Logan here.
0 just got double-crossed get out the popcorn.
He's on record for lying under oath. His word is crap!
“0 just got double-crossed get out the popcorn.”
If Clinton helps get this guy nailed I’m going to have a “Thank you Bill” party.
...and I can’t stand Clinton.
Would he stoop to lying? Ask Monica!!
The list, ping
Well, we DO know that there are some things to which Monica would stoop...
Nah, he just hasn’t had time to memorize the script.
As I posted on another thread:
I’d hate to be Obama, and have seriously dissed Bill Clinton, and then come to the point where I have to depend on BC’s loyalty and cooperation to keep me out of hot water.
Ah, Mr. Clinton. As a member of the ‘Freeper Class of 98’...thanks for the memories!
Really missed you these past 16 months. [/s]
LOL. Yes he does!
Naw, Slick Willie will just cut his own deal with 0 - step down in '12 for the good of the country and let hillary run.
Positive misprision Positive misprision is the doing of something which ought not to be done; or the commission of a serious offence falling short of treason or felony, in other words of a misdemeanour of a public character (e.g. maladministration of high officials, contempt of the sovereign or magistrates, &c.). To endeavour to dissuade a witness from giving evidence, to disclose an examination before the privy council, or to advise a prisoner to stand mute, used to be described as misprisions (Hawk. P. C. bk. I. c. 20). The old writers say that a misprision is contained in every felony and that the Crown may elect to prosecute for the misprision instead of the felony. This proposition merely affirms the right of the Crown to choose a more merciful remedy in certain cases, and has no present value in the law. Positive misprisions are now only of antiquarian interest, being treated as misdemeanours.
He’s gone from “father of the bride” to “father of the bribe”.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.