Posted on 05/11/2010 7:57:58 PM PDT by 2ndDivisionVet
I am State Senator Russell Pearce, the author of SB 1070, signed by Governor Jan Brewer. Maybe liberals ought to read the Constitution, case law, or even just the bill itself before citing incorrect information. Fear mongering and misinformation are opponents’ only tool against this common sense legislation.
Illegal is not a race, it is a crime. SB 1070 simply codifies federal law into state law, removes excuses and concerns about states’ inherent authority to enforce these laws and removes all illegal “sanctuary” policies.
When do we stand up for Americans and the rule of law? If not now, when? We are a nation of laws, a Constitutional republic.
Arizona did not make illegal, illegal. Illegal was already illegal. It is a crime to enter or remain in the U.S. in violation of federal law. States have had inherent authority to enforce immigration laws and have failed or refused to do so. Sanctuary policies are illegal under federal law (8 USC 1644 & 1373), yet we have them all over the United States.
Paul Kantner of the 1960s rock band Jefferson Airplane once remarked, “San Francisco is 49 square miles surrounded by reality.” When I first heard that San Francisco was planning to boycott Arizona over the SB 1070 legislation that I introduced, this description seemed fitting.
However, when neighboring Oakland’s city council voted 7-0 to boycott Arizona last Tuesday, and President Pro Tem of the California State Senate Derrell Steinberg announced a campaign in the Legislature to boycott us, it became clear that San Francisco is merely ahead of the California crazy curve.
Why did I propose SB 1070? I saw the enormous fiscal and social costs that illegal immigration was imposing on my state. I saw Americans out of work, hospitals and schools overflowing, and budgets strained. Most disturbingly, I saw my fellow citizens victimized by illegal alien criminals. The murder of Robert Krentz — whose family had been ranching in Arizona since 1907 — by illegal alien drug dealers was the final straw for many Arizonans. There are dozens and dozens of other citizens of our state who have been murdered by illegal aliens. Currently, 95 illegal aliens are in Maricopa County jail for murder.
Most of the hysterical critics of the bill do not even know what is in it. All SB 1070 does is allow Arizona law enforcement officials to detain illegal aliens under state law. The law does not allow police to stop suspected illegal aliens unless they have already come across them through normal “lawful conduct” such as a traffic stop, and explicitly prohibits racial profiling.
Aside from the unfounded accusation of racial profiling, the chief complaint about the bill is that it infringes on federal jurisdiction by enforcing laws. However, there is a long legal precedent going back to 1976 that allows states to pass legislation to discourage illegal immigration so long as it does not conflict with federal law. SB 1070 was specifically designed to mirror federal immigration law to avoid such a conflict.
For all their newfound respect for the authority of federal immigration law, the open borders advocates who oppose SB 1070 have no problems with “sanctuary cities” such as San Francisco that explicitly obstruct federal immigration authorities to protect illegal aliens. In 2008, San Francisco began a campaign to encourage illegal aliens to take advantage of the city’s public services.
Mayor Gavin Newsom stated, “We have worked with the Board of Supervisors, Department of Public Health, labor and immigrant rights groups to create a city government-wide public awareness campaign so that immigrants know the city won’t target them for using city services.”
The results were tragic. A few months after the campaign, Edwin Ramos, an illegal alien and member of the MS 13 gang, murdered San Francisco resident Tony Bologna and his two sons who he mistook for rival gang members. Ramos had a lengthy criminal record including a felony assault on a pregnant woman. He was arrested on gang and weapons charges and promptly released just three months before the murder. Not once did San Francisco report him to immigration authorities.
One month after the murder of Bologna, illegal alien Alexander Izaguirre stole Amanda Keifer’s purse and then intentionally ran her over with an SUV, laughing as she hit the pavement and fractured her skull. Four months earlier, Alexander Izaguirre had been arrested for felony dealing of crack cocaine. Not only did San Francisco refuse to turn him over to immigration authorities, city officials expunged his record and helped get him a job, which is criminal in and of itself.
Keifer asked the obvious question, “If they’ve committed crimes and they’re not citizens, then why are they here? Why haven’t they been deported?”
The answer is that politicians like Gavin Newsom put the interests of illegal aliens before the safety of American citizens, not unlike Phoenix Mayor Phil Gordon and others.
Our law is already working. One can just scan the newspapers and see dozens of headlines like “Illegal Immigrants Leaving Arizona Over New Law: Tough, Controversial New Legislation Scares Many in Underground Workforce Out of State.”
In contrast, American citizens are leaving California. For the last four years, more Americans have left the state than have moved in.
In criticizing the SB 1070, President Barack Obama said, “Our failure to act responsibly at the federal level will only open the door to irresponsibility by others.” There is nothing irresponsible about enforcing our law, but President Obama is right in that this is only necessary because the federal government does not do its job.
The solution is not “comprehensive immigration reform,” a euphemism for amnesty. This will only encourage more illegal immigration. Making illegal aliens legal does nothing to change the social and fiscal costs they impose on Arizona or the nation as a whole. In fact, the Heritage Foundation’s research puts the cost of amnesty at over $2.5 trillion.
The federal government simply needs to enforce its immigration laws by cracking down on employers of illegal aliens, securing our borders, and deporting illegal alien criminals. Attrition by enforcement.
If states understand states’ rights and our Constitutional duty and responsibility to our citizens, this legislation in Arizona will be a model for states across the nation and the federal government and it will end illegal immigration to America, but President Obama is looking toward San Francisco instead.
I vote for Arizona. This guy is right on BTW, too bad we don’t have a federal legislature full of guys like him, and Kudos to the Gov of Arizona also.
Those of us holding the line in Reno and in Nevada against lib’rul encroachments from California appreciate your bidness....
BTT
“And it’s no better than the American media shoveling sh!t about how there are decapitated bodies lying all over Mexico and bullets flying faster than the wild west.”
For your sake, I hope you are in a safe place in Mexico...but the reality is that it’s as bad or worse than the ‘American media’ shows it. Have you followed these foreign news reports by the Nat’l Assn. of former border patrol agents?
Take a look: Keyword: NAFBPO
More beheadings in Mexico than anywhere.
More killings of Journalists than anywhere.
The kidnapping capital of the world.
Ciudad Juarez is the MOST dangerous city in the world.
More death than in Iraq....
Photo:
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/2499245/posts?page=260#260
"Pelosi or McCain?"
Does some leftist really want America to choose between AZ and SF? Really? What do they, realistically, expect the outcome to be?
With Arizona also now disallowing all “Ethnic studies” classes in K-12, most definitely “Arizona!”
If people even know two or three people this has happened to, why does anyone go to Mexico?
“However, when neighboring Oakland’s city council voted 7-0 to boycott Arizona last Tuesday, and President Pro Tem of the California State Senate Derrell Steinberg announced a campaign in the Legislature to boycott us, it became clear that San Francisco is merely ahead of the California crazy curve.”
You might want to set Russell Pierce straight. The poor fool is under the terribly mistaken impression that your state is run by crazy socialists.
|
You know what, I have moved on. Sadly, you can’t.
Until people in the Republican leadership of California who agree with you recognize that California could be turned around with a little effort, the state will continue to have more Democrats than Republicans in power.
And each general election, California will continue to be written off, and we’ll have to overcome a 50 point electoral vote deficit that we conceded. So far, you have expressed no desire to see that change.
You are too full of yourself to listen to someone who knows the state better than you do, and you get your jollies off by insulting instead of pulling together.
People are fleeing my state. They are coming to yours. Evidently you like that too much to send a message to the California Republican Party leadership, that you’re sick and tired of their leftist enabling tactics.
Instead you play this infantile game with me, insulting me because I recognize the problems in California and know that it can be turned around.
Better to f-— with a guy on your side, than do something productive.
Kiss my ass you d-wad. And while you’re at it, get off this forum which is based in California. You know, that leftist bastion of socialists you have lumped us all into, so that you can insult at will.
Thanks for the update. Hope they go for it. .
Is this a trick question? Seriously, why would San Francisco be considered an alternative to Arizona?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.