Thereby proving creation to the creationists and evolution to the evolutionists....
To: null and void
The future is now...
2 posted on
05/10/2010 10:14:10 AM PDT by
TSgt
(We will always be prepared, so we may always be free. - Ronald Reagan)
To: null and void
One day we might even see these creatures walk the Earth again. Of course proving creationism and evolution at the same time.
3 posted on
05/10/2010 10:15:04 AM PDT by
CodeToad
To: SunkenCiv
I think this duplicates one of your posts.
To: null and void
I don't know about creationism — but, it certainly demonstrates a kind of intelligent design at work.
BTW — something everyone seems to forget — Darwin's Theory of Evolution says nothing whatsoever about the beginnings of life (just speciation).
To: null and void
“inserted them into modern-day E. coli bacteria”
That’s kind of a cr@ppy method to use!
To: null and void
Oh thank goodness ... Now the Flintstones can get that new Dishwasher.
9 posted on
05/10/2010 10:21:43 AM PDT by
TexGuy
(If it has the slimmest of chances of being considered sarcasm ... IT IS!)
To: null and void
I look forward to developing recipes for the soon-to-be no-longer-extinct mammoth. Bet it doesn't taste like chicken.
/johnny
To: null and void; SunkenCiv
If they can produce mammoth blood or hemoglobin they can give transfusions to cloned mammoths that are shot by mid-western farmers trying to save their crops.
Mammoths, cave bears and triceatrops, oh my! What a wonderful world it will be.
11 posted on
05/10/2010 10:23:33 AM PDT by
wildbill
(You're just jealous because the Voices talk only to me.)
To: null and void
Great, if my mammoth needs a transfusion I know where to take it!
12 posted on
05/10/2010 10:23:57 AM PDT by
SWAMPSNIPER
(The Second Amendment, A Matter Of Fact, Not A Matter Of Opinion)
To: null and void
Wouldn’t this make it possible to pursue cloning?
It’s strange to read this article with cloning not being mentioned at all. Perhaps the reason is the answer to my question, but what is described here seems to indicated the possibility.
13 posted on
05/10/2010 10:25:24 AM PDT by
DoughtyOne
(Excusaholic: MeCain lost to Jr., RINO endorsements are flying, & you live at 2012 Denial Blvd.)
To: null and void
This is prove positive we didn't evolve!
16 posted on
05/10/2010 10:36:10 AM PDT by
BushCountry
(scratch here ############################### to reveal my thoughts on the Obama Administration.)
To: null and void
God made a decision that these creatures were not compatible with the human race sharing the same planet. God created the scenario whereby they were destroyed; He had His reasons.
If scientist continue to mess with God’s design, God will make another decision to reveal who is boss. Creating extinction scenarios is easy for God and if Man doesn’t knock it off, those scenarios will play out soon.
To: null and void
Thereby proving creation to the creationists and evolution to the evolutionists.... ...hematology to the hematologists...
23 posted on
05/10/2010 10:45:56 AM PDT by
decimon
To: null and void
After reading on the dna extraction processes my first question is how can they be so confident that pristine dna as it exists in the cell is the result they are working with.
28 posted on
05/10/2010 12:07:20 PM PDT by
valkyry1
To: null and void
Let’s clone millions of them, make them meaner than he@# and put them all along the southern border ... Sure, T-Rex’s would be better but that will come with time.
31 posted on
05/10/2010 12:09:54 PM PDT by
Scythian
36 posted on
05/10/2010 3:34:03 PM PDT by
SunkenCiv
("Fools learn from experience. I prefer to learn from the experience of others." -- Otto von Bismarck)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson