Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Will government pensions be next to go bust? (Bill could spark a wave of NJ teacher retirements)
Star Tribune ^ | 4/28/10 | PAT DOYLE

Posted on 05/01/2010 6:32:51 PM PDT by Libloather

Will government pensions be next to go bust?
Generous benefits and faltering investments have depleted government funds.
By PAT DOYLE, Star Tribune
Last update: April 28, 2010 - 10:43 PM

A financial time bomb is ticking away -- mostly unheard by taxpayers, government workers and retirees.

Years of off-the-mark investment assumptions, inadequate contributions and generous benefits have left government pension funds in a perilous situation: unable to meet long-term commitments to current and future retirees without major changes.

"It's a serious problem," said Sen. Don Betzold, DFL-Fridley, who is working on a plan to shore up the funds.

Minnesota's retirement funds and other investment accounts lost $10 billion over the past two years, leaving about $53 billion under state management at the end of 2009. The pension funds have been slightly above or below minimum balances recommended by the federal government.

Only 76 percent of the pension obligations for 636,000 teachers, state and local government employees and retirees were fully funded at the end of last June, leaving their pensions short $12 billion. One smaller local fund could go broke in as few as five years, meaning pension checks wouldn't be cut, Betzold said.

To deal with the pension problem, legislators are proposing an unusual package of increased government payments, greater contributions from employees and reduced benefits for retirees. Bills in the House and Senate are expected to be acted on this session.

(Excerpt) Read more at startribune.com ...


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Editorial; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: government; nj; pensions; teachers
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-26 next last
Bill could spark a wave of NJ teacher retirements
1 posted on 05/01/2010 6:32:51 PM PDT by Libloather
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Libloather

(ahem) Just to make it clear: the pensions that are in trouble are state and local government pensions, NOT federal employees’ pensions. The latter are not in any financial jeopardy and are fully funded.

We now return you to your regularly scheduled state/local fiscal crisis...


2 posted on 05/01/2010 6:42:13 PM PDT by Poundstone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Libloather

If you have signed contracts for retired employees and it goes to court on challenges to changes, you will have judges who are also under contracts deciding the outcome. Which way will they lean... just wondering.


3 posted on 05/01/2010 6:49:30 PM PDT by Mark (Don't argue with my posts. I typed while under sniper fire..)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Poundstone
...NOT federal employees’ pensions. The latter are not in any financial jeopardy and are fully funded.

Just like Sosha Security?

4 posted on 05/01/2010 6:52:38 PM PDT by Libloather (Tea totaler, PROUD birther, mobster, pro-lifer, anti-warmer, enemy of the state, extremist....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Libloather

If something can’t go on, it won’t.


5 posted on 05/01/2010 6:54:51 PM PDT by rbg81 (DRAIN THE SWAMP!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Libloather

I have read that New Jersey state employees receive free health care for life. Is this true?


6 posted on 05/01/2010 6:56:15 PM PDT by combat_boots (The Lion of Judah cometh. Hallelujah. Gloria Patri, Filio et Spirito Sancto.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mark

Local government employees can sue their employer, which is why cities, counties, fire districts, etc. will have to go the bankruptcy route. Judges may be sympathetic to the claims of pensioners, but cannot make local entities sh*t money that does not exist. Several cities are in the bankrupcy process today because of pension woes.

States cannot go bankrupt, because they don’t need to. When states like NJ, CA, IL, and several others stop paying pensions or reduce pension payments and are sued by pensioners, they’ll just assert sovereign immunity.


7 posted on 05/01/2010 6:58:43 PM PDT by Spartan79 (Malo periculosam libertatem quam quietam servitutem.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Poundstone

The Fed has the convenient option of printing money. The only option states and localities have is to raise taxes.


8 posted on 05/01/2010 6:59:58 PM PDT by randita (Visit keyhouseraces.com for a list of vulnerable DEM and must hold GOP House seats.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: combat_boots; Liz; AT7Saluki; writer33
I have read that New Jersey state employees receive free health care for life. Is this true?

I've read that they pay in $125 grand and get back $2.3 million PLUS $500 grand in health coverage starting at the typical retirement age of 49.

Try ---> this. Wow.

9 posted on 05/01/2010 7:21:41 PM PDT by Libloather (Tea totaler, PROUD birther, mobster, pro-lifer, anti-warmer, enemy of the state, extremist....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Libloather

Anyone watching Greece? That’s what socialists do when they run out of other peoples’ money. Just be forwarned - and forearmed - when the socialists start rioting here.


10 posted on 05/01/2010 7:24:01 PM PDT by Oceander (The Price of Freedom is Eternal Vigilance -- Thos. Jefferson)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: randita

“The Fed has the convenient option of printing money. The only option states and localities have is to raise taxes.”

Exactly right. Which is why federal employees’ pensions are in a completely different (i.e., protected) class from state and local employees’ pensions.


11 posted on 05/01/2010 7:27:06 PM PDT by Poundstone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: randita

“The Fed has the convenient option of printing money. The only option states and localities have is to raise taxes.”

Exactly right. Which is why federal employees’ pensions are in a completely different (i.e., protected) class from state and local employees’ pensions.


12 posted on 05/01/2010 7:27:45 PM PDT by Poundstone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Libloather

This is not going to end well. No way. No how.


13 posted on 05/01/2010 7:48:40 PM PDT by combat_boots (The Lion of Judah cometh. Hallelujah. Gloria Patri, Filio et Spirito Sancto.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Poundstone

I doubt very seriously that the federal pension funds are properly funded when you have 525 crooks in Washington year round.


14 posted on 05/01/2010 8:00:24 PM PDT by Blood of Tyrants (The US will not die with a whimper. It will die with thundering applause from the left.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Libloather

Arthur Andersen could audit the pension funds, and say whatever they are paid to say.

Likely the same for virtually any other audit function, private or government.

Let’s have the bond rating agencies get involed. Insurance executives. Lawyers. Securities brokers.

Untrustworthy from bottom to top.


15 posted on 05/01/2010 8:06:02 PM PDT by truth_seeker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: combat_boots
I have read that New Jersey state employees receive free health care for life. Is this true?

Go read the NJ article: http://www.app.com/article/20100415/NEWS03/100415007/0/NEWS05&source=rss

16 posted on 05/01/2010 8:19:12 PM PDT by upchuck (FYI: Our government is now being run via fortune cookies.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Poundstone; Blood of Tyrants; randita

The federal retirement system was changed to FERS in 1986. Unlike the previous system (CSRS) that was very generous, FERS is built on benefits from three sources: Social Security, Basic Benefit Plan, and Thrift Savings Plan.

http://www.opm.gov/RETIRE/PRE/FERS/INDEX.ASP

Social Security is the same what everyone else pays. Federal employees are not exempt from SS deductions from their pay.

The Basic Benefit Plan pays 1% of your high-3 salary average per year of service. In other words, if you serve 30 years, you get 30% of your high-3 salary average.

TSP is similar to a 401K plan. The employee makes contributions with a certain percentage matched by the federal government. TSP is the largest component of federal retirement, and it is almost entirely dependent on the employee to save for their own pension.

Health care, by the way, is government subsidized, but it’s not free. Federal employees, including retirees, pay a portion of their own health insurance. Blue Cross Blue Shield, Standard Family Plan: government pays $814.75 and employee pays $400.97 per month.

http://www.opm.gov/insure/health/index.asp

The federal retirement system isn’t nearly the free ride that some folks think, but it’s definitely not a bum deal for employees either.

All government programs, federal, state, and local, need to be reassessed. Priorities MUST be set, and all of us are going to have to sacrifice something to set things right. If people refuse to accept reductions in benefits, smaller government, and higher taxes (ALL three), then I guess we’ll just have to lose it all, eventually, in financial ruin.


17 posted on 05/01/2010 10:11:31 PM PDT by CitizenUSA (Governor Palin paid her dues to Juan McPain and is backing away (and that's very encouraging!))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Libloather

It definately needs to be exposed and corrected.


18 posted on 05/01/2010 10:42:39 PM PDT by freekitty (Give me back my conservative vote; then find me a real conservative to vote for)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Poundstone
But they are UNION employees and GOVERNMENT WORKERS so what do you think will happen?

Now when Obama was faced with the same situation with the car companies and the UAW what did he do?

We really can’t afford to buy out every state though.. can we? Will we?

19 posted on 05/02/2010 12:16:04 AM PDT by JSteff (It was ALL about SCOTUS. Most forget about that and HAVE DOOMED us for a generation or more.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: combat_boots

Yes it is true. NJ state workers must work 25 years and then they get free medical. A prescription plan, that has a copay of $15.00 for three month supply. If they retire before 55 years old then the pension is reduced by I think 5% each year. So If you retire at 50 the pension is reduced 25%.
Some state workers pay into their pension, others do not, such as the teachers.


20 posted on 05/02/2010 12:35:42 AM PDT by Grazie (Serving those who served)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-26 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson