Posted on 05/01/2010 6:30:15 AM PDT by Colofornian
“You can be hospitable, just send them home. You are raping two countries, the US and Mexico. If you would like to improve the lives of the Mexican people it must be done in Mexico, otherwise you destroy TWO nations.”
Send them home the first time, by all means necessary keep them from coming back over the wall, illegally infiltrating. Otherwise the whole system is frustrated. As you said, both nations are destroyed, and the system is proverbially raped (and citizens literally). When people don’t deal with the consequences of their own actions (Like Mexicans in Mexico not standing for liberty in their own lands), they just become like locusts, moving from one area to the next as the resources dry up. People are not animals, or locusts, they must make decisions and be responsible for what happens when they do!
My honest and open question to all is what can we do when militias are kept from protecting their states, and the FedGov won’t do their job, and won’t listen to constituents/”The People.” It is treason, but what can we do? I’m asking in all sincerity.
Wow, what do Mormons think of pit bulls? /sarc
“Wow, what do Mormons think of pit bulls?”
Topic for the next Saturday morning discussion, LOL.
I always put this last, but, it’s probably the most important, so I’m putting it first, pray. Voting is one thing, course that’s so obvious. Civil but peaceful disobedience, like Martin Luther King did. Maybe citizen law suits???
I agree, praying comes first. Thanks for that reminder.
It’s ok, I need the reminding too.
You don't have a clue of what you are talking about. Get the facts before you blurt out something so untrue. There were enormous advancements made under W. For crying out loud!! Stop the damn Bush bashing!
There were enormous advancements made under W.
_________________________________________________
AH kid PSSST
President Bush was pushing the AMNESTY Bill...
Remember ???
“You don’t have a clue of what you are talking about. Get the facts before you blurt out something so untrue. There were enormous advancements made under W. For crying out loud!! Stop the damn Bush bashing!”
Well, the truth hurts and it is you who need some straight facts. Clinton did more enforcement than Bush, until people like Newt Gingrich stopped him..
I guess you’ve forgotten Bush calling anyone who wanted enforcement ‘vigilantes’. Bush was good on some things..on border security and enforcement he stank!
In fact, the Latino groups complain that Obama is doing as much enforcement as Bush.
If you don’t know these things, you should...it’s all here on FR.
And brother Jeb...well, he’s hooked up with dual Citizen Juan Hernandez to stop everything except amnesty!
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/2504082/posts?page=70#70
Incorrect. Under Bush, Border Guards were tried, probably tens of millions of illegals came across (over 8 years, 2-3 million a year), militias were put down and no wall was built.
Please name for us the effective measures you think Bush put into place. We’ll wait.
First off, it doesn’t do anyone any good when you get an attitude and start talking down. And secondly I didn’t bash him, I just stated what I see. You wouldn’t know he did much of anything by living in my old neighborhood. MS-13 have been there for years along with so many illegals the place is crawling with them. I’m sure he did more than what Obama is doing or clinton, but, it’s still a mess.
FACTS
[snip]From 2007 to 2008, the annual number of noncitizen migrants apprehended in the United States or at its borders dropped by about 170,000. In 2008, apprehension numbers hit their lowest point since 1975.
* Immigrants are apprehended (arrested) when found to be in violation of immigration laws.
* In 2008, DHS immigration officials made just under 800,000 apprehensions.
* The Border Patrol accounted for about nine in 10 of all apprehensions in 2008.
* Apprehensions along the Southwest border have decreased each year since 2005.
* The Tucson, Arizona, sector accounted for more Border Patrol apprehensions in 2008 than any other sector.
* Mexican citizens accounted for 88 percent of all apprehensions in 2008.
The number of removals and voluntary returns combined stood at about 1.2 million in 2008, the lowest level since 2003.
http://www.migrationinformation.org/USfocus/display.cfm?id=750
BUT, more prosecutions of border agents for doing their jobs happened under Bush! And most were cleared on appeal.
AuntB was agreeing with you about Bush...
Bush and Ted Kennedy were buddies when it came to the AMNESTY Bill...
MsLady, AuntB was talking to the other guy/gal FOR you. She was quoting him/her and giving rebuttal. She was saying that you were correct, she just pinged you as a courtesy, so you would know. Just a heads up, unless you just hit “reply” and didn’t realize that you were talking to the wrong person. You both agree.
Thanks for this post, and I’m glad you brought in the big guns, FACTS. Don’t mess with AuntB, lol. High Five!
Oops sorry AuntB that’s what I get for reading the first sentence and not reading the whole thing. My apologies.
Here is the crux of the interview:
Shakira is being interviewed by Dr. Sanjay Gupta and he asks about her visit with the Mayor and Chief of Police, of Phoenix and she says at one point “If this law was already in effect, today, for example, I could be detained and arrested and taken away. Because, I don't even have my drivers license here”
“I mean, I'm completely undocumented, here today!”
Dr. Gupta then asks “So you didn't bring your papers to Arizona?”
Shakira then feigns exasperation, saying “I didn't. NO”
Dr. Gupta then says “This is an important point. That's exactly what people are worried about”.
The interview continues and Dr. Gupta never uses his critical thinking skills to ask how she justifies not having her passport with her.
Shakira then demands the Congress come up with a law to nullify, in effect, other states from enacting similar laws.
FIRST! Shakira, you are a liar, flat out. There is no way you would go to any country and not have your passport and visa with you at all times.
I have traveled all over the world and I don't leave home without it.
You are a world traveler and you would never travel without your passport and visa.
You just don't. No one flys around the world without documents, it's not only the law in every country I have ever been but, it is more than common sense for identifying who you are, your visa status, Expiration and your nationality.
Your documents will get you into the embassy of your nationality, INSTANTLY!
Your visa can get you preferred status in American hospitals, if you are an American or if you are an international star.
Shakira, your statement is patently false.
You cannot get on a commercial plane NOR on a private plane without your visa and passport. PERIOD!
I travel commercially and private and it completely impossible to board without documentation.
If you are arrested, it should be for your idiotic lie, which demonstrates your intellectual skills of an adolescent.
Sanjay, you should be fired for failure to probe. I am certain you have traveled just as much I have and you could have easily used your critical thinking skills to probe the absurdity of her statement.
I would never have someone as dumb as you operate on me. You might skip something.
Never underestimate the stupid actions of celebrities. But you are right on all counts, you generally can’t go anywhere without a passport, an exception I hear, being Cuba...(By way of somewhere else).
You are very kind, my pleasure.
Mexico, illegal aliens - TERRORISM,
time to call it what it is
http://towncriernews.blogspot.com/
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.