Posted on 04/23/2010 12:50:45 AM PDT by KDD
A drilling rig that burned for more than a day before sinking Thursday has fouled Gulf of Mexico waters with a potentially major spill of crude oil, officials said. The collapse of the oil rig could disgorge up to 336,000 gallons of crude a day into waters about 40 miles off the Louisiana coast. U.S. Coast Guard Rear Adm. Mary Landry said the sunken rig, the Deepwater Horizon, increased the threat for environmental damage, which previously appeared minimal. With new challenges from the collapsed rig, a growing assemblage of cleanup crews began to work in the area, hoping to stop the oil before the spill were to reach the shore.
Meteorologists predicted a change in the Gulf's current today that would push the oil toward the Louisiana and Mississippi coastlines. But Landry said the spill isn't expected to reach the coast. We have the ability to keep it offshore, she said. BP, the oil company that leased the offshore rig, said it had mobilized four aircraft that can spread chemicals to break up the oil and 32 vessels that can recover more than 171,000 barrels of oil a day from the surface. BP officials also expected to have a million feet of boom in place to help contain the spill by today. We have contingency plans in place to respond to any anticipated situation, and the full resources of BP are being mobilized to implement those plans, said David Rainey, vice president of Gulf exploration for BP. Even then, federal and BP officials said it wasn't clear whether oil was flowing from the well after the platform sank because they didn't know what was happening underwater.
(Excerpt) Read more at chron.com ...
Status update 3rd of may:
BP is looking at installing a new BOP on top of the existing well, which could then be used to shut the well, BP executive Bob Fryar said.
Fryar normally heads BP offshore exploration operations in Angola.
Sometime in the next three days, BP will try to install a meter to gauge the pressure on the lower marine riser package (LMRP), which sits on top of the existing BOP, to see if it might be possible to install a new BOP on top.
If pressures are not too high, Fryar said crews could shear off the broken riser and LMRP unit and then “stab” or stack a second BOP unit on top of the original BOP.
The new BOP is already on board the Transocean drillship Discoverer Enterprise, which is believed to be on location.
It could have been any number of things TW but as I say the photos of the rig I have in my possession which were taken from a an on scene work boat right after the explosion and fire do not indicate any such incident.
Thanks for the update my friend!
That is sure worth a try!
Thanks for the info.
GOD I hate Bill ******* Gates!!!!
What I was putting up was a heavily edited (ergo readable) grep-and-copy of the text at this annoyingly dark and superwidescreen-my-computer-is-so-new-and-bad fishermen's website populated by really young guys.
Site's here, go see, I'm not going to **** with all that **** again.
Screw it.
http://www.mudinmyblood.net/forum/showthread.php?t=6104
**** Bill Gates.
I hope someday we know why the damn BOP failed.
Thank lg, great site.
I wonder if this young man and his fishing buddies realize how close they came to meeting their maker? From reading this it sure doesn’t sound like it to me!
Anyway, if this is an accurate description there is NO doubt any longer! The well swallowed the drilling fluid in the bore and the rest is history.
Brown (”good job, Brownie”) was on Cavuto a few minutes ago talking about the government response to this. He slammed Obambi and the media, and spoke briefly about his own mistakes. One thing he regretted was not speaking up - he said he’d have been fired anyway, but would have gotten his word out.
He did well.
I'm sure they won't begrudge the dayrates on additional equipment, 5,000 bbl/day at $80/bbl, yeah, that's what they're losing (more, actually, as the pressure cones around the blowout take-point in the reservoir, which will reduce ultimate recovery %'s throughout the reservoir).
Are those the ones that have been circulating around the Net via e-mail?
If you have other pix from an on-scene eyewitness, he needs to send them in.
The examples I gave of "sneaky" blowouts -- Ixtoc and Santa Barbara -- had different causes and pathways, but you don't always get the warning pit-volume gains when you're losing control of a well. Underground blowout zone-to-zone behind pipe is an example; and Santa Barbara was a behind-pipe blowout that came to surface outside the casing strings.
Ixtoc blowout was gas-cut oil-base mud, sneaky, dangerous, and fast -- like this one! If BP was using water-base mud, then that scenario's off the table.
Sounded like one guy knew something about it, but our intrepid fishing-report cub reporter had no clue.
I keep wondering why he said "water" not "mud" -- they look different. And the stinging in the eyes -- if the well was full of clear completion fluid (CaCl, CaBr2, various other brines), that could account for it. 'Course, he wouldn't have smelled gas. Oil or condensate, yes, ethane and propane, no.
He came real close! I ought to send him a note somehow ...... "Hey, Darwin ...."
Interview Mark Levin with an engineer who was on board:
http://www.marklevinshow.com/article.asp?id=1790422
Riser mud was being displaced with seawater (typical pre-completion, pre-temp ab'dm't T/A procedure); Halliburton was rigged down and gone for 20 hours, cement presumably cured in that time.
Everything, and I DO mean everything “James” said in that interview tends, at least to my mind, confirm my earlier stated theory. Especially in light of the operations taking place after the liner testing.
Great find and they are lucky there was someone on board that knew what was happening.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.