Skip to comments.
Get ready for … Romney/Palin 2012 ?
Hot Air ^
| APRIL 15, 2010
| ED MORRISSEY
Posted on 04/15/2010 7:57:49 AM PDT by RobinMasters
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-60, 61-80, 81-100 ... 161-178 next last
To: newfreep
Its’ true. I like and admire Sarah Palin but I do not believe she is ready for the big show in 2012. She may be ready don’t the line but not now. And yes, her voice goes right through me. That’s just me. I know she has lots of admirers but does she have the right stuff to get Indpendents on board. Time will tell.
61
posted on
04/15/2010 8:29:43 AM PDT
by
LottieDah
(If only those who speak so eloquently on the rights of animals would do so on behalf the unborn)
To: discostu
It’s not a matter of purity, Romney pushed socialized medicine on his state Not just that. If Romeny is the GOP nominee, that will give 0bozo a cover for his crimes in forcing 0bamcare on us, and let him get away with it in the campaign. See my post # 52.
To: NurdlyPeon
The only way this ticket works! Also, let's face it, there is a ZERO percent chance Romney would pick Palin - that number again is ZERO.
63
posted on
04/15/2010 8:30:19 AM PDT
by
TitansAFC
(The Left does not devote so much effort into attacking Sarah Palin because she's a weak candidate.)
To: RobinMasters
Sarah Palin: fooling conservatives into supporting liberals since 2008
64
posted on
04/15/2010 8:30:54 AM PDT
by
EternalVigilance
(Ronald Reagan: "Peace Through Strength." Barack Obama: "Perpetual War Through Utter Weakness.")
To: discostu
don’t vote for Massachusetts liberals, don’t care what letter comes after their names
After all the whoopla last fall about Brown, he is turning out to be a northeastern liberal along the lines of Snowe and Collins. Graham from SC isn't much better.
Is it the water or the east coast or did their mummies drop them on their heads when they were wee little babies?
65
posted on
04/15/2010 8:31:38 AM PDT
by
TomGuy
To: RobinMasters
66
posted on
04/15/2010 8:32:10 AM PDT
by
patriot preacher
(To be a good American Citizen and a Christian IS NOT a contradiction. (www.mygration.blogspot.com))
To: RobinMasters
Romney/Palin in 2012?
Nope. It’ll be Palin. But not with Romeny. And not as veep. See my tagline. I’ve had it up for about a month now.
67
posted on
04/15/2010 8:33:34 AM PDT
by
Responsibility2nd
(PALIN/MCCAIN IN 2012 - barf alert? sarc tag? -- can't decide)
To: TomGuy
I think it’s the Kennedy worship. Even the ones that decide to put an R after their name grow up worshiping “camelot”, especially in Mass.
68
posted on
04/15/2010 8:34:25 AM PDT
by
discostu
(wanted: brick, must be thick and well kept)
To: EternalVigilance
EternalVigilance: Fooling himself into thinking he gets to decide who the GOP nominee for 2012 is, since 2008.
To: ZULU
I’d prefer Palin/Romney or Hunter/Palin or Palin/Bachmann or Bachmann/Palin or Palin/Jindhal.
_______________________
See my tagline. Would you be OK with that?
70
posted on
04/15/2010 8:35:06 AM PDT
by
Responsibility2nd
(PALIN/MCCAIN IN 2012 - barf alert? sarc tag? -- can't decide)
Wouldn’t mind seeing Jindal/Bachman.
To: Virginia Ridgerunner; All
Wouldn’t mind seeing Jindal/Bachman.
To: Responsibility2nd
Would like to see Jindal/Bachman.
To: TomGuy
After all the whoopla last fall about Brown is fine ..as a US Senator from a super liberal state like Massachusetts. He is infinitely better than what Martha Coakley would have been. What Brown is not, is a GOP presidential candidate material
“Graham from SC isn't much better.”
For a GOP Senator from a conservative state like SC, Graham is a disaster. He has to be beaten at all costs in 2014.
To: cricket
Maybe you’re right. He does kinda have Southern preacher hair.
75
posted on
04/15/2010 8:42:19 AM PDT
by
nolongerademocrat
("Before you ask G-d for something, first thank G-d for what you already have." B'rachot 30b)
To: Run262Texas
Jindal can’t be at the top of the ticket for two reasons:
1.) He ruled out 2012.
2.) He has to run for re-election in 2011, which makes a Presidential run impossible. It does not necessarily rule out a Veep nomination, though.
76
posted on
04/15/2010 8:45:00 AM PDT
by
TitansAFC
(The Left does not devote so much effort into attacking Sarah Palin because she's a weak candidate.)
To: RobinMasters
Now there is a ticket I could get behind.......
I think Romney would make a great VICE PRESIDENT.
77
posted on
04/15/2010 8:47:14 AM PDT
by
SENTINEL
(SGT USMC COMBAT VET)
To: Run262Texas
Nonsense!
Jindal just doesn’t have the fire; only Palin goes in kicking a$$ and taking names from beginning to end. We don’t need any deal makers.
The same logic eliminates any member of congress, such as Bachmann. Hunter, DeMint, etc. Congress lives by deals and compromise, and we have to reject all deals.
.
78
posted on
04/15/2010 8:48:32 AM PDT
by
editor-surveyor
(Obamacare is America's kristallnacht !!)
To: RobinMasters; Allegra; American Constitutionalist; campaignPete R-CT; CanadianMusherinMI; ...
79
posted on
04/15/2010 8:51:04 AM PDT
by
fieldmarshaldj
(~"This is what happens when you find a stranger in the Amber Lamps !"~~)
To: RobinMasters
IMHO....Palin / Bolton !!!!
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-60, 61-80, 81-100 ... 161-178 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson