'Professor' Obama ? Title never granted

WorldNetDaily ^ | APRIL 9, 2010 | Jerome R. Corsi

[RobinMasters]

Are attorneys Barack and Michelle Obama currently licensed to practice law?

Was Barack Obama ever a professor of constitutional law at the University of Chicago?

In recent days, these questions have once again gone viral on the Internet.

WND has traced the current controversy to Doug Ross and a March 1 posting on his DirectorBlue.blogspot.com asserting the Obamas are no longer lawyers registered to practice law in Illinois and that claims President Obama was a professor of constitutional law at the University of Chicago are "a sham."

This current round of the controversy harkens back to the 2008 presidential campaign when Democratic presidential contender Hillary Clinton made nearly the same charges in a March 25, 2008, "Hillary for President" press release entitled "Just Embellished Words: Senator Obama's Record of Exaggerations & Misstatements."

After stating Barack Obama was not a law professor at the University of Chicago, the Clinton press release insisted: "He (Barack Obama) is a senior lecturer (now on leave) at the school. In academia, there's a vast difference between the two titles. Details matter. Professors have tenure while lecturers do not."

[CRBDeuce]

...too late again, story of my life!

[SteamShovel]

To be perfectly honest, I’d rather have Michelle Obama as president, if I was forced to choose one or the other.

Her resume definitely is better than his, not saying she's actually qualified. But on paper, she actually HAS a resume to present. His resume was simply....

.....Barack Obama

.....Community Organizer

.....Racist Anti-Caucasian

Now he can add the line.....

.....U. S. Pres_ent

[manc]

nail on head.
I have been saying for a long time now that this man is a puppet and those behind the scenes have been planning this take over for many many years, over 20 years for sure and maybe when he met Ayers back in NY who then took him to chicago.
Think about it.
This man comes out of no where, he lost an election but still is put into office while disqualifying the person who beat him.
He writes a book while covering his own background.
He appears at the Dem convention and the media went wild.
Why did they ?, He did alright but was it wasn’t the greatest, no doubt the media took their talking points from those behind the scenes.
I remember telling the wife at the time of that speech that it was alright but the media have gone overboard and that we know nothing about it so lets wait and see.

His wife told him to go to a black church in order to learn how to talk and deliver speeches correctly.
He stayed in that church for 20, that is a long time to not hear anything isn’t it?

This whole take over has been planned for over 20 years and they found obama, a guy who was clueless and looking to fit in, not much of a background and family from a third world country which is hard for others to trace his roots .especially in those kind of countries which do not keep much paper trails.

Karl Marx once said that their agenda could not pass with public violence but they would have to get into positions of power and influence. What better position of power than the white house?

Ayers learned like Hitler did.
Public violence would not work as it moves the moderates away from you. The way to change was from the inside and beat the system that way.

We know the change slogan was used in Duval patricks election and they did say they watched how that worked.

They now have succeeded to get into the top position and damage this country and many of us on the right have been reacting to what they do instead of getting out there moves ahead of them.

[supremedoctrine]

It’s THIS that offers infinitely more potential than any
“Birther” issue. I’m firmly convinced that after all this time those issues will NEVER be allowed their proverbial day in court. It’s the highly counterfeit persona of Obama himself, and his ‘respectable’ identity that is REALLY suspect, and dovetails very nicely into his unstoppable ascension into the highest office in the land.
I don’t think a mere expose, in the form of relentless questioning of this C.V. part of his background is enough to topple him, but if played right I think it can cumulatively constitute several of the ‘death by a thousand cuts’ that will discredit him completely. Everything about him, after all, is made-up, embroidered-upon, embellished,
faked,tricked-up,hidden, and like The Talented Mr. Ripley, he’d “rather be a fake Somebody than a Real Nobody”..

[999replies]

Such a Charismatic young stud must have had many nubile young ladies worshiping at his feet as he organized the community toward the promised land\

lol

[xrmusn]

Karl Marx once said that their agenda could not pass with public violence but they would have to get into positions of power and influence.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Wasn’t it Abbie Hoffman that said “All I have to do is shave, get a haircut, put on suit and go take a 9-5 job, it may change my appearance etc but surely doesn’t CHANGE MY LINE OF THINKING”..

Not an exact quote etc, but it is the gist of the statement...may have been one of the other Chicago 7 but ....

[Marylander]

See #21

[Marylander]

... Gonna have to get my donation ready again! ...

Good idea.

[null and void]

As I’ve said before:

Not a footprint. No family history to either defend or betray, no family name to protect or destroy. To be perfectly honest, I’d rather have Michelle Obama as president, if I was forced to choose one or the other.

He’s very dangerous. He’s got nothing to lose.

And if the rumors are correct, With AIDS, not much time to lose it in.

If is is a muslim (and I believe he is at his core) the most important thing in his life is establishing ummah. And he is in the place to remove the main impedement, The Great Satan, as a world power.

He knows if he can pull this off, even if he is hanged for his trouble he would

• die in Jihad, islam's only guaranteed way to get into that whorehouse-in-the-sky they call Paradise,
• have the happy believers in this earthly paradise singing praises to him, personally, for thousands of generations.

He is filled with great wrath, because he knoweth that he hath but a short time...

[AFret.]

Has a former student of our Pathetic Resident come forward and claimed to have actually attended one of his classes?

Anyone....anyone............

[thecodont]

I would argue about part of this. Usually...a new guy is brought in, and there is a review process by a board with the university...usually three to four years later....to state if the guy gets tenure. If they think he’s done a good bit of work....published some reviews and papers...and gotten positive comments by the senior professors...then it’s an automatic “yes”.

Some of you may remember the gal down in Huntsville, who got riled up and upset when tenure wasn’t going to be offered to her, and she shot the board members.

In this case, I seriously doubt that he ever got the tenure offer. Note, you’d have to publish some reviews and documents....which we know that he’s virtually incapable of writing anything (you don’t notice such reviews out there...do you?).

So he could continue on as a regular professor....but never have tenure, thus missing retirement with the big bucks. My guess was that this was a stopping station...to fill a square to claim he was a “professor”, and no more. Everyone was doing their piece to get him to the next level (even the Nobel Peace Prize committee).

At an accredited law school, I would think it would be a five-year review period for tenure (and a mid-career review at two years), then tenure granted if the (academic) tenure review board approves of the candidate.

The tenure approval would be based on a record of favorable teaching evaluations, papers written and published, public service, and general contribution to legal scholarship.

I'm sure the Association of American Law Schools (AALS) could offer more information on this individual.

[Gay State Conservative]

Hussein padded his resume? Color me stunned!!!

[RipSawyer]

“It started long before Obama was capable of planning such things.”
//////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////

He still isn’t capable of planning such things. He has a lot in common with Bill Clinton and part of that is being basically lazy. He is possibly even lazier than Clinton. Clinton is far more intelligent in any case.

[FreeAtlanta]

FakeResume.com; How Common is Resume Fraud?

Talks about George O'Leary's resume fluff that was caught when he tried to go from Georgia Tech to Notre Dame

O'Leary Resume Fraud

[kabumpo]

I agree — big money people behind him — they were probably looking for someone like him for years, the way a movie studio looks for an actreess to be cast in a part.

[OregonPatriot2010]

Maybe we are wrong to be looking for “nubile young ladies” for an expose’.

[Stosh]

Not real sure what you mean by “revisionism” - moreover I’ve never regretted working with undergrads (and I can produce hundreds of undergrads who’d be glad to tell you that).

Sounds like you may have had an unpleasant experience in college, but I don’t appreciate your taking it out on me (now if you want to take it out on Obama, that’s a different matter).

[Vendome]

What’s this about AIDS?

[null and void]

It's just a rumor based, as near as I can tell, on little more than the Larry Sinclair assertion that he is a closeted gay, and his light build (in Africa AIDS is called "The Slims").

I don't put much stock in it, but can't deny the possibility.

After all, what do we really know about this guy???