Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Newly Formed ‘Federation’ of Tea Party and Grassroots Groups Announced
Fox News ^ | April 8, 2010 | Cristina Corbin

Posted on 04/08/2010 10:05:17 AM PDT by Zakeet

Edited on 04/08/2010 10:20:23 AM PDT by Admin Moderator. [history]

In an effort to build its credibility and influence nationwide, the tea party movement on Thursday announced the formation of a "federation" of tea party groups.

Mark Shroder, a member of the Memphis Tea Party, told a crowd of roughly 200 conservative activists gathered outside the state capitol that 21 factions of the movement will form the National Federation Tea Party. Shroder said the federation will act as a "rapid response" to "misinformation" allegedly put forth by the "mainstream media."


(Excerpt) Read more at liveshots.blogs.foxnews.com ...


TOPICS: Activism/Chapters; Breaking News; Constitution/Conservatism; Miscellaneous; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: conservatism; elections; military; obama; palin; teaparty; teapartyexpress; teapartyrebellion
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 101-120121-140141-160 ... 261-278 next last
To: ReneeLynn
Can't disagree. Once you become a "party" then sooner or later you lose your real raison d'etre (Biblical American values embodied in among other things, the Declaration of Independence and the Constitution) and start to put a premium on your own perpetuation. You lose the edge of, "Give me liberty or give me death."

This also remains true to our founding fathers, namely Washington who LOVED our country and HATED partisan politics for that very reason. Of course many of our founding fathers seemed to find it fairly fantastic that people generally wouldn't embrace the benevolence and freedom wrought by our revolution and our Constitution, hence no need for parties.

Nevertheless, I like the decentralization of this movement - it more reflects the ideals we love and believe in. And I think it can still be effective, maybe more so, in getting the right people into office and the wrong people out.

121 posted on 04/08/2010 11:53:16 AM PDT by Jim W N
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: TexasFreeper2009

We have several million leaders. That’s enough.


122 posted on 04/08/2010 11:53:28 AM PDT by listenhillary (Capitalism = billions raised from poverty, Socialism = billions reduced to starvation)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 118 | View Replies]

To: listenhillary
I am the leader of the tea party. We do not need a structure, we do not need candidates, we do not need leaders. The tea party is an idea that people believe in.

Indeed. The name "Tea Party" has been stolen by opportunistic political back-benchers to promote themselves to a higher level in the same old political game.

We need to change the name of the movement and leave these self annointed leaders standing flat-footed with their "Tea Party" brand.

123 posted on 04/08/2010 11:53:44 AM PDT by Kowdawg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Natural Born 54

I agree. I still have the McCain/Palin stickers on the back of my pickup truck; with duct tape over the McCain part.


124 posted on 04/08/2010 11:54:07 AM PDT by OrioleFan (Republicans believe every day is the 4th of July, democrats believe every day is April 15)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 98 | View Replies]

To: ReneeLynn
"No, we also have the choice of electing good, conservative Republicans."

are there really any of those left? (no pun) itr is a dying breed.

125 posted on 04/08/2010 11:54:34 AM PDT by Beloved Levinite (I have a new name for the occupier of The Oval Office: KING FRAUD! (pronounced King "Faa-raud"))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: ReneeLynn
No. A horrible idea. The Tea Party movement organizes when it’s necessary. For rallies, etc. Once there are ‘leaders’ the corruption sets in.

What you're describing is a movement with no means to combat the negative image being painted for it by the MSM. Not to mention no means of telling people who are not in the choir, what the movement is all about.

There's a tremendous amount of energy in the Tea Party movement, and a just cause ... but there's no focus, and thus no possibility of the movement exerting a coherent, national political influence.

It's not enough to play ad hoc games to organize "when it's necessary." You're facing a very well-organized opponent with vast resources, with well-organized and motivated partisans operating at both the national and local levels.

Look back at the events surrounding the formation of the First Continental Congress.

Is there a danger of corruption? Of course -- there always is. But the Founders organized despite that, and so should this movement.

Interestingly, it sounds like you don't actually trust anybody in the Tea Party movement. That's a pretty bad place to start, doncha think?

Ah, well, suit yourself.

126 posted on 04/08/2010 11:54:41 AM PDT by r9etb
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 102 | View Replies]

To: r9etb

the road to victory is through the tea party.

(what happened to the sons of liberty?)


127 posted on 04/08/2010 11:56:27 AM PDT by longtermmemmory (VOTE! http://www.senate.gov and http://www.house.gov)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 86 | View Replies]

To: Zakeet

This is not good news at all. Now it appears to me the Moderates/RINO’s want to control, thus redefine the Tea Party movement as they have the Republican Party in their perspective.


128 posted on 04/08/2010 11:57:31 AM PDT by rockinqsranch (Dems, Libs, Socialists...Call 'em What you Will, They ALL have Fairies Living In Their Trees.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rfreedom4u

Is he even still alive? lol


129 posted on 04/08/2010 11:57:34 AM PDT by Beloved Levinite (I have a new name for the occupier of The Oval Office: KING FRAUD! (pronounced King "Faa-raud"))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 115 | View Replies]

To: Brookhaven
I posted this below, but wanted to run it by you because at first I thought, "A viable third party..." but then read, "No centralization..."

Can't disagree. Once you become a "party" then sooner or later you lose your real raison d'etre (Biblical American values embodied in among other things, the Declaration of Independence and the Constitution) and start to put a premium on your own perpetuation. You lose the edge of, "Give me liberty or give me death."

This also remains true to our founding fathers, namely Washington who LOVED our country and HATED partisan politics for that very reason. Of course many of our founding fathers seemed to find it fairly fantastic that people generally wouldn't embrace the benevolence and freedom wrought by our revolution and our Constitution, hence no need for parties.

Nevertheless, I like the decentralization of this movement - it more reflects the ideals we love and believe in. And I think it can still be effective, maybe more so, in getting the right people into office and the wrong people out.

130 posted on 04/08/2010 11:59:18 AM PDT by Jim W N
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 120 | View Replies]

To: servantboy777

HOUSTON....Tea Party, Sam Houston Race Track

I’ve got two carloads coming. Looking for more.


131 posted on 04/08/2010 12:00:08 PM PDT by texmexis best
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 96 | View Replies]

To: longtermmemmory
(what happened to the sons of liberty?)

They organized on a national level (or at least the Colonial equivalent).

Why did they organize that way? Because they were smart, and understood not only the stakes involved, but also the level of organization required to combat the over-reaching government of the time.

The battle seldom, if ever, goes to the less-organized army. The war never does.

132 posted on 04/08/2010 12:00:14 PM PDT by r9etb
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 127 | View Replies]

To: Beloved Levinite

The Republicans have impressed me the last 13 months. They have face mountains of abuse at the hands of this administration and the media. Now they need to learn how to act if they ever win.

Does that mean I’m going to donate to the RNC? It is unlikely that I will ever do so again.

http://senateconservatives.com/v1/index.php?c=S7PRK


133 posted on 04/08/2010 12:00:20 PM PDT by listenhillary (Capitalism = billions raised from poverty, Socialism = billions reduced to starvation)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 125 | View Replies]

To: All

Hopefully, this TPM group does not align itself with Freedom Works (Dick Armey...pro-Illegal/anti-American) or with Glenn Beck’s 9/12 (Obama Enabler, anti-Birther, New Age).....this would be more dangerous than going third party

Best bet is that this is just a way to network with others in the TPM. Funny that no one seems to mind the Tea Party Express group...but are up in arms over this TPM decision

All this “third party is bad” talk is nonsense. People already blasting a conservative Third Party tells me that the GOP will run another Liberal RINO in 2012. The GOP lost in ‘92 and ‘96 not because of Perot voters...they lost for running a Liberal RINO.

Running a real conservative keeps third parties from forming....


134 posted on 04/08/2010 12:00:46 PM PDT by UCFRoadWarrior (JD Hayworth for Senate jdforsenate.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 123 | View Replies]

To: r9etb

I think it’s a bad place when you let the left and liberals distract you from your purpose by getting caught up in answering their rhetoric. This is what’s happening. How much money are they going to waste and time, in refuting lies? Once the left distracts them that way the message gets diluted and momentum is wasted.


135 posted on 04/08/2010 12:01:05 PM PDT by ReneeLynn (Socialism is SO yesterday. Fascism, it*s the new black. Mmm Mmm Mmm.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 126 | View Replies]

To: Brookhaven
I agree...Third party is just that...THIRD! It only divides further from the winning candidate who will take out OB. If they go further and appoint a candidate it will play right into the Democrats hopes and dreams! And who is this character that announced the decision to go this route? Did Tea Party people have a say in this?...I surely didn't. So who are the people now speaking for the tea party people? I will not be a part of to this if it continues this direction...it reeks too much like they are gearing up for a third party candidate.
136 posted on 04/08/2010 12:03:11 PM PDT by caww
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 120 | View Replies]

To: DoughtyOne

That’s wonderful that the tea party in Pasadena is supporting the Republican candidate for the 43rd Assembly district in California. Precisely the way the conservative movement is supposed to influence elections.


137 posted on 04/08/2010 12:03:46 PM PDT by onyx (Sarah/Michele 2012)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: Freddd
Not a chance that Sarah would run on a third party ticket.

She is a conservative Republican, and she would want to win.

Third parties LOSE, and cause the Dems to win.

She cares too much about the country to let that happen.

138 posted on 04/08/2010 12:04:31 PM PDT by ohioWfan (Proud Mom of a Bronze Star recipient!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 104 | View Replies]

To: SE Mom
Third parties are doomed.
This man is a fool and an irresponsible one at that- we’re in enough trouble, serious trouble- we surely don’t need MORE divisiveness.

Amen.

139 posted on 04/08/2010 12:06:26 PM PDT by onyx (Sarah/Michele 2012)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 64 | View Replies]

To: Marty62

Plus, I would not put it past the Democrats to infiltrate the tea party movement and try to derail it.


140 posted on 04/08/2010 12:07:05 PM PDT by BunnySlippers (I LOVE BULL MARKETS . . .)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 103 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 101-120121-140141-160 ... 261-278 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson