Posted on 03/27/2010 5:51:59 AM PDT by raybbr
Two years ago, John McCain transformed Sarah Palin overnight from an obscure first-term Alaska governor into a national celebrity when he picked her as his vice presidential running mate.
Now Palin is repaying the favor, putting her prestige on the line in an effort to help the four-term Arizona senator overcome his toughest re-election challenge ever.
The two campaigned together Friday for the first time since they lost the presidential race in 2008.
At the first of two rallies this weekend, Palin pumped up Tea Partiers, invoking the cause of the first Tea Party in 1773.
"Remember it was the Freedom Fighters and those who protested tyranny and big government," she said. "And that's what we're doing today."
"And when you think about that first Tea Party, shoot, some may claim that John was there, at the first Tea Party," she said with a laugh, poking fun at McCain's age. McCain, who is 73, grinned widely beside her.
(Excerpt) Read more at thefoxnation.com ...
The only disgrace around here is YOU and your pals who are stinking up the forum with your attacks on Sarah Palin.
And as far as I'm concerned, you are NO better than Bob J.
BTW, were you sitting up on the front pew like I suggested, or just slinking down in the back row?
I don’t get it - All of this hatred for Sarah. If Hayworth winds up winning, this is all a mute point! For crying out loud - Arizona would you please just vote in J.D?!?
I posted "FUSP!" and "FUJM!" And I stand by my words. That was vile and vulgar. Not as vile or vulgar as Ms. Palin's despicable betrayal of Tea Partiers by backing the ultimate CINO, one John Sidney McCain III!
I was at Searchlight yesterday and there are tens of thousands of people that heartily disagree and make your statemnts look really, really stupid.
Yes or no?
This is the real disgrace to Free Republic.
Shameful.
Simply shameful.
Only a troll would agree with anything 0 has done, and I suspect there are trolls who try to tell others not to get excited, 0 doesn't mean what you think, etc. Usually they curse him some of the time and slyly support him the rest.
I don't know why McCain turned against his own country, except that he was tortured in Hanoi both physically & mentally, with the psychological indoctrination ongoing for the years he was a POW; they turned him against his own country which is why he fought to stop further investigation into searches in 'Nam for any POWs that the NV did not release. He insulted not only others in those committees but the families of POWs gathered there. (I am putting it mildly) McCain and John f'n Kerry had financial reasons to want badly for trade with Vietnam to be opened up with the US.
I always wondered why he protested so loudly that the POWs were all dead, there was no one left, etc., but I had admired him so much that I rationalized that maybe he was right, after all he'd been thru he knew more than I did, so forth. I voted for him here in the primary in 2000, but later learned more over a period of years.
A strong enabler like McCain, is just as bad as 0bama.
See Aunt B’s post #756
We see right through this juvenile tactic. It reminds me of little boys throwing the basketball under the girls doing jump rope. When the nuns caught these boys, they met Sister Superior after school with a nice board and their bare calves.
These political instigators are still nerds and will continue to be; even after those Sister Superiors in their lives tried to spank it out of them.
You are calling DeMint a RINO? You have absolutely no crediblity left. Too bad FR doesn’t have an ignore button
Fred Malek, Sarah Palin and the Case for Loyalty
As far as the other stories go, they make clear that Scheunemann and the other advisors were her chief allies within the campaign AGAINST backstabbers Steve Schmidt, Nichole Wallace, and Rick Davis, among others.
So in a word, SO WHAT?
So, you’re saying Palin is a Rino but DeMint is not a RINO?
DeMint is only a RINO by the same set of standards that you and your one percenters have set up for Palin.
Cuckoo.
Cuckoo.
You have been posting this same drivel for 6 months.
Duh, first you said it proved that Palin was a RINO, but as has been corrected...Malek is a total Romney bot. He doesn’t support Palin at all.
He likes her, but his allegiance is to Romney. Period.
Your motivation is suspect.
It will be Palin or Romney.
If and when it comes down to those two, I will support Sarah wholeheartedly. Till then I can think of at least three more candidates I will support instead. A hell of a lot can happen between now and 2012.
This is just a bit too far. Shame on Palin.
“Duh, first you said it proved that Palin was a RINO,”
See, that’s why your judgment on anything is suspect. I have never said that,in fact just the opposite. Don’t reply to me, because you just can’t get it right. You’re a waste of time.
“I dont know if Palin is a rino, except for her misguided admiration of McCain, she comes off pretty solid. Shes either VERY confused, or not what she appears to be. She had no right to state that the Tea Partiers are behind McCain.”
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/2481736/posts?page=22#22
"Hey ass clown, count on this: God will judge you for that comment. Believe it you hypocrite."
Seems to me, jessup, that YOU were the one who brought up 'hypocrites' and 'judgment' on this thread. Not me. Not only does that make YOU a HYPOCRITE, but a LIAR.
Now get back up on that porch little poodle.
Hark, I hear a poodle yipping somewhere in the distance...
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.